Plasticity and avalanche behaviour in microfracturing phenomena

Abstract

Inhomogeneous materials, such as plaster or concrete, subjected to an external elastic stress display sudden movements owing to the formation and propagation of microfractures. Studies of acoustic emission from these systems reveal power-law behaviour1. Similar behaviour in damage propagation has also been seen in acoustic emission resulting from volcanic activity2 and hydrogen precipitation in niobium3. It has been suggested that the underlying fracture dynamics in these systems might display self-organized criticality4, implying that long-ranged correlations between fracture events lead to a scale-free cascade of ‘avalanches’. A hierarchy of avalanche events is also observed in a wide range of other systems, such as the dynamics of random magnets5 and high-temperature superconductors6 in magnetic fields, lung inflation7 and seismic behaviour characterized by the Gutenberg–Richter law8. The applicability of self-organized criticality to microfracturing has been questioned9,10, however, as power laws alone are not unequivocal evidence for it. Here we present a scalar model of microfracturing which generates power-law behaviour in properties related to acoustic emission, and a scale-free hierarchy of avalanches characteristic of self-organized criticality. The geometric structure of the fracture surfaces agrees with that seen experimentally. We find that the critical steady state exhibits plastic macroscopic behaviour, which is commonly observed in real materials.

Main

Quasi-static models of fracture propagation have been extensively studied in the past11. Such analyses have been mainly focused on the geometrical properties of the macroscopic crack, although some dynamical effects have also been studied12,13. Recently, avalanches and other dynamical properties have been investigated in a model for hydraulic fracturing14. However, the amplitude distribution associated with the acoustic emission signal did not reveal any scaling behaviour.

The mesoscopic description of an elastic disordered medium is usually obtained by discretizing macroscopic elastic equations. In the theory of linear elasticity15, these equations relate the stress tensor sαβ to the strain tensor εγδ via the Hooke tensor Cαβγδ:

In highly inhomogeneous materials, like concrete, linear elasticity breaks down owing to the formation and the propagation of microcracks. It is still possible to describe the system using equation (1) by using an effective Hooke tensor . The ‘damage’ D is defined through the relation between C and (ref. 16),

where the tensor indices have been omitted for simplicity. The full tensorial formalism can be quite complex to handle numerically. Fortunately, many essential features of fracture phenomenology can be described using scalar models11,17,18. There is a formal analogy between the scalar elasticity problem and an equivalent electrical problem; one identifies the current I with the stress, the voltage V with the strain, and the conductivity σ with the Hooke tensor: we will use this electrical analogy.

To study the system at a mesoscopic scale, we discretize the problem by considering a resistor network17 on a tilted square lattice. We introduce the disorder, due to the inhomogeneities present in the material, by assigning a random failure threshold Ic to each resistor, where Ic is drawn from a uniform distribution in the interval [0,1]. In the classic ‘fuse’ model17,19, if the current flowing in a resistor exceeds the failure threshold, the bond is removed from the lattice (that is, the electrical conductivity drops to zero). In this way the system develops a macroscopic crack and eventually the lattice breaks apart. We adopt a different breaking rule: when the current in a bond exceeds the threshold, we impose permanent ‘damage’ to the bond by decreasing the conductivity of the bond by a factor a ≡ (1 − D). Describing the local damage with a continuous parameter corresponds to studying the system at a scale larger than the microscopic crack scale, but smaller than the homogeneous macroscopic scale.

After a bond failure we choose at random a new threshold for the bond in order to model the microscopic rearrangements in the material. The model in this form is quite slow to simulate numerically. A big reduction in the simulation time can be obtained by also changing the thresholds of the bonds that neighbour a damaged bond. This local rearrangement does not change the properties of the model but makes it easier to obtain statistics of sufficiently high quality.

The simulation proceeds as follows. We apply an external voltage difference between two opposite edges of the lattice, while periodic boundary conditions are imposed on the other direction. We compute the currents in each bond by solving numerically the Kirchoff equations, using a multigrid20 relaxation algorithm with precision ε = 10−12. The voltage is then slowly increased until the current in some bond reaches its threshold. The bond is damaged and the disorder is changed according to the rules specified above. We then compute new currents and repeat the process until no unstable bonds are present. Owing to the long-range elastic interactions and the ‘redistribution’ of the disorder, a single bond failure can be followed by an avalanche of additional failures.

We study the system in the limit of ‘slow driving’: the timescale over which fractures form and propagate is much faster than the timescale of the external driving. This is a common characteristic of systems that display self-organized criticality (SOC). In fact, for SOC systems the control parameter is always related to the ratio between two timescales. In this situation, however, the existence of a timescale separation makes the system very close to the critical point for a wide range of internal parameters.

We start the simulation with undamaged material: all the conductivities are set equal to one. In the early stage of the process only small rearrangements take place. This is also evident by observing the structure of the microfractures in the system (Fig. 1a): the damage is homogeneously scattered throughout the system. Increasing the voltage leads to a corresponding increase of the total current flowing in the system: macroscopically the material behaves elastically. Deviations from linear elasticity start to appear as the activity increases. Eventually, the system reaches a steady-state which is macroscopically ‘plastic’ (Fig. 2), in the sense that the increase of the voltage is balanced by the damage in such a way that the current is kept approximately constant. In this state the activity is highly fluctuating and avalanches of all sizes occur. Plastic behaviour is not uncommon in stressed synthetic materials21.

Figure 1: The damage for a system of size L = 64.
figure1

a, In the early stage, after 500 avalanches; b, in the steady state, after 1,000 avalanches. c, The final crack, which develops in the highly damaged region. Damaged parts are shown in red and undamaged parts in yellow; absent bonds (the crack) are shown in black.

Figure 2: The I–V characteristics of the present model for different values of the parameter a (see text).
figure2

Note the crossover at V ≈ 12 between linear elasticity and plasticity.

The damage in the steady state tends to be organized in linear bands (Fig. 1b), arising from the coalescence of the underlying microfractures. A similar geometrical structure has been observed in microfracturing experiments on concrete22,23. We note that a plastic steady state characterized by highly fluctuating activity has been recently obtained in molecular dynamic studies of granular solids24 and foams25 under shear.

In the plastic steady state, we investigate the statistical properties of rupture sequences (Fig. 3a) in time and magnitude during fracturing. We define the avalanche size s as the number of bonds damaged for a given voltage increment, and find that the avalanche size probability distribution function P(s) exhibits a power-law behaviour

Figure 3: a, The number of broken bonds s as a function of time.
figure3

b, The avalanche size distribution for different system sizes (L = 16,32,64). The statistical analysis is performed only in the steady state for a = 0.9, averaging over 2× 104 avalanches.

where τ = 1.19 ± 0.01. By computing the distribution for different lattice sizes, we observe that the cut-off scales with the system size (Fig. 3b). This is the fingerprint of a scale-free activity; an absence of characteristic lengths in the system.

We next compute the distribution of the time duration T of each avalanche, obtaining a power-law decay

where α = 1.30 ± 0.01. Again we find that the cut-off scales with the system size.

We also study the distribution of energy bursts, which is directly related to the acoustic-emission signal recorded experimentally. In this case also we find a power-law distribution if the energy is rescaled by the energy of the unbroken lattice, as pointed out in refs 26 and 27. The results for a lattice of size L = 64 are shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4: The distribution of energy bursts, related to the experimentally observed acoustic emission.
figure4

We fit the power-law distribution with an exponent equal to 1.2 ± 0.1.

Another quantity of interest is the distribution of time intervals Δt between two avalanches in the steady state (Fig. 5). We find a power decay which is reminiscent of the Omori law in earthquake statistics28 where γ≈ 1. The above behaviour provides another indication that the system is critical in the plastic steady state, which develops critical correlations and scaling behaviour through a self-organization process. The critical exponents seem to be independent of the changes in the damage parameter a within numerical uncertainties.

Figure 5: The distribution of quiescent intervals Δt between two avalanches in the plastic state.
figure5

Plotted for reference is a line with slope corresponding to γ = 1 in equation (5).

In our model the steady state could in principle last forever. However, in realistic situations, the damage description should fail at a given point. After a certain number of failure events, a bond will no longer respond elastically. This observation can be modelled in a natural way by allowing for only a finite number of failures per bond. In other words, when the conductivity of a bond reaches a given value σc owing to the repeated failures, the bond is no longer considered to be elastic and is removed from the lattice. The parameter σc adjusts the duration of the steady-state: for high values of σc, the steady state is never reached and fracture is brittle, whereas a low value of σc produces a plastic steady state. In both cases a macroscopic crack will eventually form. In Fig. 1c we observe that the crack develops in the region of high damage and has a rough structure. Owing to the limited system size, we were not able to calculate reliably the roughness exponent.

We note that to observe this behaviour the system must be driven at a constant voltage. We have also performed simulations in which the system is driven by imposing a constant current: in this case no steady state is observed and the system is driven to an instability corresponding to the critical current of the voltage-driven experiment. One can still fit the non-stationary distribution of avalanches with a power law but the system is clearly not SOC. With our model we can therefore reconcile the controversy9,10 between SOC and ‘sweeping of an instability’29 as possible explanations of microfracturing experiments: either of the two phenomena can arise according to the driving conditions. It would be interesting to test this prediction experimentally by comparing avalanche signals in stress-driven and strain-driven experiments. In interpreting experimental results, it is important to keep in mind that SOC requires a ‘stationary’ signal. In fracture phenomena this can be obtained in the plastic regime.

References

  1. 1

    Petri, A., Paparo, G., Vespignani, A., Alippi, A. & Costantini, M. Experimental evidence for critical dynamics in microfracturing processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3423–3426 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Diodati, P., Marchesoni, F. & Piazza, S. Acoustic emission from volcanic rocks: an example of self-organized criticality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2239–2242 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Cannelli, G., Cantelli, R. & Cordero, F. Self-organized criticality of the fracture processes associated with hydrogen precipitation in niobium by acoustic emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3923–3926 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bak, P., Tang, C. & Wiesenfeld, K. Self-organized criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381–384 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Cote, P. J. & Meisel, L. V. Self-organized criticality and the Barkhausen effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1334–1337 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Field, S., Witt, J., Nori, F. & Ling, X. Superconducting vortex avalanches. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1206–1209 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Suki, B., Barabási, A. -L., Hantos, Z., Peták, F. & Stanley, H. E. Avalanches and power-law behaviour in lung inflation. Nature 368, 615–618 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Gutenberg, B. & Richter, C. F. Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 185–188 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Sornette, D. Power laws without parameter tuning: an alternative to self-organized criticality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2306 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Cannelli, G., Cantelli, R. & Cordero, F. Reply to Sornette D., ‘Power laws without parameter tuning: an alternative to self-organized criticality’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2307 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Herrmann, H. J. & Roux, S. (eds) Statistical Models for the Fracture of Disordered Media (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Sornette, D. & Vanneste, C. Dynamics and memory effects in rupture of thermal fuse networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 612–615 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Miltenberger, P., Sornette, D. & Vanneste, C. Fault self-organization as optimal random paths selected by critical spatiotemporal dynamics of earthquakes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3604–3607 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Tzschichholz, F. & Herrmann, H. J. Simulations of pressure fluctuations and acoustic emission in hydraulic fracturing. Phys. Rev. E 51, 1961–1970 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Landau, L. D. & Lifschitz, E. M. Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon, New York, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Wilshire, B. & Owen, D. R. J. Engineering Approaches to High Temperature Design (Pineridge, Swansea, UK, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    De Arcangelis, L., Redner, S. & Herrmann, H. J. Arandom fuse model for breaking processes. J. Phys. (Paris) 46, L585–L590 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Herrmann, H. J., Kertész, J. & de Arcangeliis, L. Fractal shapes of deterministic cracks. Europhys. Lett. 10, 514–519 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    De Arcangelis, L. & Herrmann, H. J. Scaling and multiscaling laws in random fuse networks. Phys. Rev. B 39, 2678–2684 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Press, W. H. & Teukolski, S. A. Multigrid methods for boundary value problems. Comput. Phys. 5, 154–519 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Chen, W. F. Plasticity in Reinforced Concrete (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Stroeven, P. in Interfaces and Cementous Composites (ed. Maso, J. C.) 187–196 (Spoon, London, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Stroeven, P. Some observations on microcracking in concrete subjected to various loading regimes. Eng. Frac. Mech. 35, 775–782 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Tillemans, H. J. & Herrmann, H. J. Simulating deformations of granular solids under shear. Physica A 217, 261–288 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Okuzono, T. & Kawasaki, K. Intermittent flow behavior of random foams: a computer experiment on foam rheology. Phys. Rev. E 51, 1246–1253 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Caldarelli, G., Di Tolla, F. & Petri, A. Self organization and annealed disorder in fracturing process. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2503–2506 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sahimi, M. & Arbabi, S. Scaling laws for fracture of heterogeneous materials and rock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3689–3692 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Omori, F. J. Coll. Sci. Imper. Univ. Tokyo 7, 111 (1894).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Sornette, D. Sweeping of an instability: an alternative to self-organized criticality to get powerlaws with parameter tuning. J. Phys. I France 4, 209–221 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Caldarelli, R. Cuerno, J. Kertész, H. J. Herrmann, K. B. Lauritsen, A. Petri, C. Rebbi and P. Stroeven for suggestions and discussions. The Center for Polymer Studies is supported by NSF.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Zapperi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zapperi, S., Vespignani, A. & Stanley, H. Plasticity and avalanche behaviour in microfracturing phenomena. Nature 388, 658–660 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/41737

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing