Abstract
The stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse-gas concentrations is the ultimate objective of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. To investigate the gas emissions required to achieve this goal for CO2 over the next few hundred years, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)1,2 has used two sets of concentration pathways (‘profiles’). One set is based solely on smooth changes in emission towards concentration stabilization3, and the other goes further by incorporating economic considerations4. Here I devise new profiles that take into account emissions-limitation proposals restricted to ‘Annex I’ (developed) countries, as well as the constraints imposed by more recent emissions data (now available until the end of 1995; ref. 5). The Annex I scenarios considered are two that span proposals recently considered by the IPCC6, and a less restrictive case. Using the new CO2-concentration profiles and a carbon-cycle model7 to determine global CO2 emissions, and taking into account the prescribed Annex I country emissions, I determine the CO2-emission requirements for non-Annex I (developing) countries to achieve the stabilization of atmospheric concentration at about twice preindustrial values. I show that action by Annex I countries within the bounds of the scenarios considered can mean that non-Annex I countries have several decades before their emissions need to depart significantly from a ‘business as usual’ (no intervention) trajectory. Alternatively, if international trade in carbon emissions is permitted, non-Annex I countries can choose to emit below their ‘business as usual’ baseline and benefit from the trading of emission rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schimel, D. S. et al. in Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Reprot of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) 65–86 (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1996)).
Schimel, D. S. et al. Stabilization of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socio-economic Implications(IPCC Technical Paper 3, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, (1997)).
Enting, I. G., Wigley, T. M. L. & Heimann, M. Future Emissions and Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide: Key Ocean/Atmosphere/Land Analyses(CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Mordialloc, Australia, (1994)).
Wigley, T. M. L., Richels, R. & Edmonds, J. A. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature 379, 240–243 (1996).
Marland, G., Andres, R. J. & Boden, T. A. in Trends '93: A Compendium of Data on Global Change(eds Boden, T. A., Kaiser, D. P., Sepanski, R. J. & Stoss, F. W.) 505–581 (ORNL/CDIAC-65, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge, TN, (1994)).
Wigley, T. M. L., Jain, A. K., Joos, F., Shukla, P. R. & Nyenzi, B. S. Implciations of Proposed CO2 Emissions Limitations(IPCC Technical Paper 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, (1997)).
Wigley, T. M. L. Balancing the carbon budget. Implications for projections of future carbon dioxide concentration changes. Tellus 45B, 409–425 (1993).
Wigley, T. M. L. in The Global Carbon Cycle(eds Wigley, T. M. L. & Schimel, D. S.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Stanford, CA, in the press).
Leggett, J. A., Pepper, W. J. & Swart, R. J. in Climate Change, 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment(eds Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A. & Varney, S. K.) 69–95 (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1992)).
Pepper, W. J. et al. Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC—An Update: Background Documentation on Assumptions, Methodology, and Results(US EPA, Washington, DC, (1992)).
Acknowledgements
I thank G. Marland for pre-publication access to the emissions data given in Table 1, and R. Richels for suggestions on improving an earlier version of this paper. This work was supported by the US Department of Energy. NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wigley, T. Implications of recent CO2 emission-limitation proposals for stabilization of atmospheric concentrations. Nature 390, 267–270 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/36818
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/36818
This article is cited by
-
The Timing and Strategic Role of Self-Protection
Environmental and Resource Economics (2009)
-
The benefits and costs of waiting: early action versus delayed response in post-SRES stabilization scenarios
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies (2000)
-
The great debate on CO2 emissions
Nature (1997)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
