Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions

Abstract

WE propose here a mechanism for territorial pattern formation in wolves (Canis lupus) and analyse it using a spatially explicit mathematical model incorporating wolf movement and scent marking. Model results reflect field observations from northeastern Minnesota: buffer zones where wolves are scarce arise between adjacent packs, and near these buffer zones there are increased levels of scent marking1,2. Territories are arranged in a spatial mosaic (Fig. 1) which covers the wolf range. In the model formulation no assumptions are made about actual existence or extent of wolf territory and buffer zones; these arise naturally as stable steady-state solutions to the equations. We show mathematically how reduced predation by wolves in the buffer zones provides a refuge for prey species. Field studies support this; distribution of a primary prey species, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), correlates negatively with that of wolves. Deer are found primarily in buffer zones3,4 (Fig. 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mech, L. D. Technical report, US Forest Service Research Paper NC-97 (North Central Forest Experimental Station, St Paul, Minnesota, 1973).

  2. Van Ballenberghe, V., Erickson, A. W. & Byman, D. Wildl. Mono. 43, 1–43 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoskinson, R. L. & Mech, L. D. J. Wildl. Manage. 40, 429–441 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rogers, L. L., Mech, L. D., Deanna, K. D., Peek, J. & Korb, M. J. Wildl. Manage. 44, 253–258 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peters, R. P. & Mech, L. D. Am. Sci. 63, 628–637 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mech, D. L. The Way of The Wolf (Voyageur, Stillwater, Minnesota, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merti-Millhollen, A. S., Goodman, P. A. & Klinghammer, E. Zoo Biol. 5, 7–20 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mech, L. D. The Wolf: The Ecology and Behaviour of an Endangered Species (Natural History Press, Garden City, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peters, R. in The Behaviour and Ecology of Wolves (ed. Klinghammer, E.) 119–152 (Garland, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mech, L. D. Science 198, 320–321 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hickerson, H. in Man, Culture and Animals: The Role of Animals in Human Ecological Adjustments (eds Leeds, A. & Vayd, A.) 43–65 (American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington DC, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, M., Murray, J. Modelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions. Nature 366, 738–740 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/366738a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/366738a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing