Abstract
THE turns joining segments of secondary structure have been proposed to be key elements in dictating the folded structures of native proteins1–9. An alternative view assumes that turns play a passive role and are merely default structures that occur as a consequence of interactions between antiparallel segments of secondary structure, with chain reversal being dictated by the context surrounding the turn and not by the sequence of the turn itself10,11. The solvent-exposure of turns and their tolerance to evolutionary variance suggests that they may have little or no effect on the formation of native structures. Previous investigations have focused on various types of β-turns that connect antiparallel (β-strands1–3,12,13, with comparatively little reported on the structural role of interhelical turns. Here we probe the structural importance of such a turn in an antiparallel 4-helix bundle by randomly substituting an interhelical tripeptide in cytochrome b-562 with many different amino-acid sequences. Thirty-one of the resulting substituted proteins were characterized and all of them were shown to fold into stable, native-like structures. These results suggest that this interhelical turn does not does not play a dominant role in determining the folded structure of this antiparallel 4-helix bundle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chou, P. Y. & Fasman, G. D. Biochemistry 13, 222–245 (1974).
Fasman, G. D. Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation (Plenum, NewYork, 1989).
Sibanda, B. L., Blundell, T. L. & Thornton, J. M. J. molec. Biol. 206, 759–777 (1989).
Skolnick, J. & Kolinski, A. J. molec. Biol. 212, 787–817 (1990).
Sikorski, A. & Skolnick, J. J. molec. Biol. 212, 819–836 (1990).
Chou, K. C. Maggiora, G. M. & Scheraga, H. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 7315–7319 (1992).
Dyson, J. H., Rance, M., Houghton, R.A., Lerner, R. A. & Wright, P. E. J. molec. Biol. 201, 161–200 (1988).
Wright, P. E., Dyson, J. H. & Lerner, R. A. Biochemistry 27, 7167–7175 (1988).
Milburn, P. J., Meinwald, Y. C., Takahashi, S., Ooi, T. & Scheraga, H. A. Int. J. Pep. Prot. Res. 31, 311–321 (1988).
Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 1075–1078 (1984).
Argos, P. J. molec. Biol. 197, 331–348 (1987).
Rose, G. D., Gierasch, L. M. & Smith, J. A. Adv. Prot. Chem. 37, 1–109 (1985).
Hynes, T. R., Kautz, R. A., Goodman, M. A., Gill, J. F. & Fox, R. O. Nature 339, 73–76 (1989).
Mathews, F. S., Bethge, P. H. & Czerwinski, E. W. J. biol. Chem 254, 1699–1706 (1979).
Lederer, F., Glatigny, A., Bethge, P. H., Bellamy, H. D. & Mathews, F. S. J. molec. Biol. 148, 427–448 (1981).
Eisenbeis, S. J. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 1084–1088 (1985).
Wells, J. A., Vasser, M. & Powers, D. B. Gene 34, 315–323 (1985).
Reidhaar-Olson, J. F. et al. Meth. Enzym. 208, 564–586 (1991).
Greenfield, N. & Fasman, G. D. Biochemistry 8, 4108–4116 (1969).
Itagaki, E. & Hager, L. P. J. biol. Chem. 241, 3687–3695 (1966).
Fisher, M.T. Biochemistry 30, 10013–10018 (1991).
Young, H. D. Statistical Treatment Of Experimental Data Ch.2 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).
Hertzberg, O. & Moult, J. Proteins: Structure. Function and Genetics 11, 223–229 (1990).
Shortle, D. & Meeker, A. M. Biochemistry 28, 936–945 (1989).
Dill, K. A. & Shortle, D. Rev. Biochem. 60, 795–825 (1991).
Ramakrishnan, C. & Ramachandran, G. N. Biophys. J. 5, 909–933 (1965).
Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. in Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation (ed. Fasman, G.) 1–98 (Plenum, NewYork, 1989).
Regan, L. & DeGrado, W. F. Science 241, 976–978 (1988).
Fedorov, A. N. et al. J. molec. Biol. 225, 927–931 (1992).
Hecht, M. H., Richardson, J. S., Richardson, D. C. & Ogden, R. C. Science 249, 884–891 (1990).
Hahn, K. W., Klis, W. A. & Stewart, J. M. Science 248, 1544–1547 (1990).
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1990).
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 5463–5467 (1977).
Bernstein, F. et al. J. molec. Biol. 112, 535–542 (1977).
Dent, L. & Cortese, R. Meth. Enzym. 155, 111–119 (1987).
Nikkila, H., Gennis, R. & Sligar, S. G. Eur. J. Biochem. 202, 309–313 (1991).
Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D. & Zakour, R. A. Meth. Enzym. 154, 367–382 (1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunet, A., Huang, E., Huffine, M. et al. The role of turns in the structure of an α-helical protein. Nature 364, 355–358 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/364355a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/364355a0
This article is cited by
-
Molecular Modification of Protein A to Improve the Elution pH and Alkali Resistance in Affinity Chromatography
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2014)
-
Obligatory steps in protein folding and the conformational diversity of the transition state
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (1998)
-
A designed four helix bundle protein with native-like structure
Nature Structural Biology (1997)
-
Amino-acid substitutions in a surface turn modulate protein stability
Nature Structural Biology (1996)
-
In vitro evolution of thermodynamically stable turns
Nature Structural Biology (1996)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
