Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas

Abstract

Natural composite materials are renowned for their mechanical strength and toughness: despite being highly mineralized, with the organic component constituting not more than a few per cent of the composite material, the fracture toughness exceeds that of single crystals of the pure mineral by two to three orders of magnitude1. The judicious placement of the organic matrix, relative to the mineral phase, and the hierarchical structural architecture extending over several distinct length scales both play crucial roles in the mechanical response of natural composites to external loads2,3,4. Here we use transmission electron microscopy studies and beam bending experiments to show that the resistance of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas to catastrophic fracture can be understood quantitatively by invoking two energy-dissipating mechanisms: multiple microcracking in the outer layers at low mechanical loads, and crack bridging in the shell's tougher middle layers at higher loads. Both mechanisms are intimately associated with the so-called crossed lamellar microarchitecture of the shell, which provides for ‘channel’ cracking in the outer layers and uncracked structural features that bridge crack surfaces, thereby significantly increasing the work of fracture, and hence the toughness, of the material. Despite a high mineral content of about 99% (by volume) of aragonite, the shell of Strombus gigas can thus be considered a ‘ceramic plywood’, and can guide the biomimetic design of tough, lightweight structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Microarchitecture of the shell of Strombus gigas.
Figure 2: Images of shell specimens that show lamellar interfaces.
Figure 3: Damage development in the shell of Strombus gigas due to the difficulties of crack propagation within the middle layer.
Figure 4: Load–displacement curves of notched bend test specimens.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wegst, U. G. K. & Ashby, M. F. Material selection charts for natural materials. Report No. CUED/C_EDC/TR55 (Cambridge Univ., 1997).

  2. Taylor, J. D. & Layman, M. The mechanical properties of bivalve (mollusca) shell structures. Palaeontology 15, 73–86 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Currey, J. D. & Taylor, J. D. The mechanical behaviour of some molluscan hard tissue. J. Zool. Lond. 173, 395–406 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Currey, J. D. in Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials (eds Currey, J. D. & Vincent, J. F. V.) 75–97 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bøggild, O. B. The shell structure of the mollusks. K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. 2, 232–325 ( 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, J. G. in Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms (eds Rhoads, D. C. & Lutz, R. A.) 69–113 (Plenum, New York, 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Curry, J. D. & Kohn, A. J. Fracture in the crossed-lamellar structure of Conus shells. J. Mater. Sci. 11 , 1615–1623 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson, A. P., Vincent, J. F. V. & Turner, R. M. The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 234, 415–440 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, A. P., Vincent, J. F. V. & Turner, R. M. Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3173– 3178 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn-Spearing, L. T., Kessler, H., Spearing, S. M., Ballarini, R. & Heuer, A. H. Fracture mechanisms of the Strombus gigas conch shell: Implication for the design of brittle laminates. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 6583– 6594 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kessler, H., Ballarini, R., Mullen, R. L., Kuhn, L. T. & Heuer, A. H. A biomimetic example of brittle toughening: (I) steady state multiple cracking. Comput. Mater. Sci. 5, 157–166 ( 1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, B. & Marshall, D. B. Concepts for bridged cracks in fracture and fatigue. Overview No. 111. Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 341–363 ( 1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.H.H. and R.B. thank V. Laria, H. Kessler and L. Kuhn, former postdoctoral research fellows, for their contributions to his understanding of the shell of Strombus gigas. This research was supported by EPRI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. H. Heuer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamat, S., Su, X., Ballarini, R. et al. Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas. Nature 405, 1036–1040 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35016535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35016535

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing