The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens

Article metrics


Originally published as Nature 401, 811–815; 1999

Macrophages orchestrate innate immunity by phagocytosing pathogens and coordinating inflammatory responses1. Effective defence requires the host to discriminate between different pathogens. The specificity of innate immune recognition in Drosophila is mediated by the Toll family of receptors2,3; Toll mediates anti-fungal responses, whereas 18-wheeler mediates anti-bacterial defence4,5,6. A large number of Toll homologues have been identified in mammals, and Toll-like receptor 4 is critical in responses to Gram-negative bacteria7,8,9,10,11. Here we show that Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited specifically to macrophage phagosomes containing yeast, and that a point mutation in the receptor abrogates inflammatory responses to yeast and Gram-positive bacteria, but not to Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, during the phagocytosis of pathogens, two classes of innate immune receptors cooperate to mediate host defence: phagocytic receptors, such as the mannose receptor, signal particle internalization, and the Toll-like receptors sample the contents of the vacuole and trigger an inflammatory response appropriate to defence against the specific organism.


Macrophage phagocytosis of the yeast cell-wall particle zymosan is accompanied by secretion of the inflammatory mediator tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Internalization of zymosan is mediated, in part, by the mannose receptor, a classic example of an innate immune pattern-recognition molecule, but the signalling pathway that elicits TNF-α production is unknown12. Given the role of Toll-like receptors in pro-inflammatory signalling during innate defence, we explored whether these molecules are also found on phagosomes. We expressed haemagglutin A (HA)-tagged murine Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) in the mouse macrophage cell line, RAW-TT10. In the absence of a phagocytic stimulus, the receptor was distributed uniformly on the cell surface (Fig. 1a). After a 5-min incubation with zymosan particles, TLR2 was highly enriched on phagosomes (Fig. 1b, c). Phagocytosis occurs through a series of discrete steps: initially the particle is bound to the cell surface; actin polymerization leads to pseudopod extension around the particle; the particle is completely engulfed by the cell; and lastly actin is depolymerized, allowing further phagosome maturation through membrane-transport events1. The enrichment of TLR2 was apparent throughout all phases of internalization (Fig. 1b, c, zymosan particles 1–4): the receptor was enriched under bound particles (zymosan 1), in processes extending around extracellular particles (zymosan 2) and in membranes around fully engulfed particles (zymosan 3), and it remained enriched on the phagosome for several minutes after actin disassembly (zymosan 4; and data not shown). Within 10 min after internalization, however, TLR2 was no longer enriched on the vacuole (data not shown).

Figure 1: TLR2 is enriched on phagosomes containing yeast particles.

a, Epitope-tagged TLR2 was detected on the cell surface by immunofluorescence microscopy in RAW-TT10 cells transiently expressing the receptor. b, When these cells were incubated with zymosan for 5 min and processed for immunofluorescence microscopy, zymosan particles, both external (particles 1 and 2) and internal (particles 3 and 4), were clearly visible by phase microscopy. c, TLR2 was markedly enriched around the particles during all stages of internalization.

Phagocytosis of particles is tightly coupled to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but the mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. The presence of TLR2 on phagosomes indicated that it might mediate pro-inflammatory signals during zymosan phagocytosis. To establish a role for TLR2 in zymosan-induced cytokine release, we needed to define a dominant-negative form of this receptor. Genetic evidence in the C3H/HeJ mouse indicates that a P712H substitution in the related Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) may act as a dominant-negative mutation of the receptor and prevent LPS signalling in the mouse10,11,13. We therefore constructed a putative dominant-negative mutant TLR2, in which proline 681 was replaced by a histidine (TLR2-P681H), a mutation that is equivalent to the P712H substitution in TLR4. Chinese hamsters fail to express functional TLR2 because of a frame-shift mutation in the receptor14, making Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells an ideal model system in which to define dominant-negative mutants of TLR2 signalling. Expression of TLR2 in CHO cells resulted in a moderate level of constitutive activation of NF-κB, which was not increased substantially upon exposure of the cells to zymosan (Fig. 2a). CD14 has been shown to facilitate the activation of TLR2 by bacterial products15,16. Cotransfection of CHO cells with CD14 and TLR2 greatly enhanced zymosan-induced NF-κB activation (Fig. 2a), whereas expression of CD14 by itself did not mediate zymosan-induced signalling (data not shown). TLR2-P681H did not mediate zymosan-induced activation of NF-κB in the presence of CD14, indicating that the mutation abrogated the capacity of the receptor to signal (Fig. 2a). Importantly, TLR2-P681H acted as a dominant-negative inhibitor of TLR2-mediated activation of NF-κB (Fig. 2a). Identical results were obtained with Staphyloccus aureus (data not shown). When expressed in RAW-TT10 macrophages, TLR2-P681H was distributed at the cell surface and was substantially enriched around zymosan-containing phagosomes, indicating that it was properly localized to function as a dominant-negative inhibitor of particle-induced signalling through endogenous TLR2 ( Fig. 2b).

Figure 2: Expression of TLR2-P681H blocks zymosan-induced TNF-α production.

a, The relative activity of a NF-κB-luciferase reporter was assessed in CHO cells transiently expressing the indicated constructs before (open bars) or after (filled bars) stimulation with zymosan. In the sample showing inhibition of TLR2 by TLR2-P681H (asterisk), the mutant receptor was cotransfected with the wild-type receptor at a 10:1 ratio. b, Epitope-tagged TLR2-P681H, transiently expressed in RAW-TT10 cells, was highly enriched on zymosan phagosomes. The HA tag was detected by immunofluorescence microscopy as in Fig. 1. c, d, RAW-TT10 cells transiently transfected with the control expression vector (pTIGZ2+) were stained for production of TNF-α and analysed by flow cytometry following no stimulation (c), or after incubation with zymosan (d). e, Cells expressing TLR2-P681H failed to induce TNF-α after stimulation with zymosan. f, Using the regions defined in e, the thin line indicates TNF-α produced in stimulated GFP-low cells, and the bold line indicates TNF-α produced in stimulated, TLR2-P681H-expressing cells (GFP-high). The dotted line indicates background, unstimulated TNF-α production; y axis, relative cell number.

To determine whether TLR2-P681H was capable of inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines during phagocytosis in macrophages, we designed a single-cell assay in which we could simultaneously analyse the expression of the mutant receptor and zymosan-induced TNF-α production. In this assay, transient expression of TLR2-P681H and green fluorescent protein (GFP) from a single bicistronic transcript permitted GFP intensity (as measured by flow cytometry) to reflect accurately the level of TLR2-P681H expression (see Supplementary Information). RAW-TT10 cells were transfected with a control vector expressing only GFP, and 100,000 cells were analysed by flow cytometry. TNF-α production remained at background levels over three logs of expression of GFP (Fig. 2c). When stimulated with zymosan particles, TNF-α production was induced equally in all cells irrespective of their level of GFP expression (Fig. 2d ). Expression of TLR2-P681H correlated in a dose-dependent manner with the inhibition of TNF-α production induced by zymosan ( Fig. 2e). Cells producing TLR2-P681H (as measured by GFP expression) clearly failed to produce TNF-α, whereas cells in the same sample that did not express the inhibitory receptor produced TNF-α. Expression of TLR2-P681H in RAW-TT10 cells also inhibited zymosan-induced activation of NF-κB, as measured by its translocation from the cytosol to the nucleus (see Supplementary Information). Particle binding and internalization were unaffected by the expression of the mutant receptor (data not shown; and see below), indicating that phagocytosis and particle-induced cytokine production were uncoupled in these cells. The full spectrum of TNF-α production by GFP-positive or GFP-negative cells (Fig. 2e, boxed regions) is shown in Fig. 2f. GFP-negative cells (Fig. 2f, thin line) had appreciable zymosan-induced TNF-α production, which was inhibited in TLR2-P681H-expressing cells (thick line), effectively to unstimulated levels (dotted line). Thus, TLR2 couples the phagocytosis of zymosan to TNF-α production, and the extent of the inhibition (>90%) suggests that this is the primary pathway.

As phagocytosis of yeast resulted in TLR2-mediated signalling, we examined the potential for this receptor to signal TNF-α production during the phagocytosis of other pathogens. TNF-α production induced during the phagocytosis of S. aureus, a Gram-positive bacterium, was completely inhibited by the expression of TLR2-P681H (Fig. 3), as was TNF-α induction by the Gram-positive bacterial cell-wall components lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan (data not shown). By contrast, TNF-α production elicited during the phagocytosis of Salmonella minnesota R595 , a Gram-negative bacterium, was unaffected by the expression of TLR2-P681H (Fig. 3). Similarly, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a key pro-inflammatory component of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall, induced TNF-α normally in the presence of TLR2-P681H ( Fig. 3). Thus, TLR2 discriminates yeast and Gram-positive bacteria from Gram-negative bacteria. The C3H/HeJ mouse, which bears a P712H mutation in TLR4, is hyporesponsive to LPS, indicating that TLR4 participates in the recognition of Gram-negative bacteria10,11. Expression of TLR4-P712H in RAW-TT10 macrophages strongly inhibited LPS-induced TNF-α production, whereas it had no effect on S.-aureus-induced signalling ( Fig. 3). TLR4-P712H inhibited S.-minnesota-induced TNF-α production to a lesser degree than was observed with soluble LPS ( Fig. 3). These data show that individual Toll family receptors convey specificity in mediating pro-inflammatory signals from different pathogens.

Figure 3: Inhibition of particle-induced TNF-α production by TLR2-P681H is selective.

RAW-TT10 cells transiently transfected with TLR2-P681H (upper panels), wild-type TLR2 (middle panels) or TLR4-P712H (lower panels) were analysed for particle-induced TNF-α production. The cells were stimulated as indicated with S. aureus, S. minnesota or LPS. Using the regions defined in Fig. 2e, the thin lines indicate TNF-α produced in stimulated, GFP-low cells, and the bold lines indicate TNF-α produced in stimulated, TLR-expressing cells (GFP-high). The dotted lines indicate background, unstimulated TNF-α production; y axes, relative cell number.

Further insight into the mechanism by which TLR2 signals was obtained by the observation that expression of the wild-type receptor partially inhibited zymosan- and S.-aureus-induced TNF-α production, but had no effect on S. minnesota- and LPS-induced TNF-α production ( Fig. 3; and data not shown). The data indicate that over-expression of the wild-type receptor may dilute out other molecules required for TLR2 function, perhaps a structural component of the receptor, and further shows that TLR2 does not participate in the response of macrophages to Gram-negative bacteria.

MyD88 is a cytoplasmic adaptor protein that binds to the Toll-homology domain of TLR4 and the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R), and mediates their downstream signalling17,18,19,20. Binding of MyD88 to these receptors is mediated by a C-terminal Toll-homology domain, whereas its N-terminal death domain is important for the propagation of the signal through the protein kinase IRAK (IL-1 receptor associated kinase). The C-terminal Toll domain of MyD88 is a dominant-negative inhibitor of TLR4 and IL-1R signalling, whereas the death domain constitutively activates these pathways17,18,19. Expression of the C-terminal MyD88 dominant negative (MyD88-DN) correlated precisely with inhibition of TNF-α production induced during the phagocytosis of zymosan and the Gram-positive bacterium, S. aureus ( Fig. 4a). The failure of TNF-α induction could not be attributed to an inhibition of particle binding or internalization, as the internalization of fluorescently labelled zymosan, S. aureus and S. minnesota was unaffected by MyD88-DN expression (Fig. 4b). Thus, MyD88 is required for TLR2 signalling in the macrophage. MyD88-DN also inhibited TNF-α production induced by the Gram-negative bacterium S. minnesota and by LPS (Fig. 4a), although the inhibitor was less effective against the whole bacterium (as observed with TLR4-P712H in Fig. 3). These later data indicate that, during phagocytosis of Gram-negative bacteria, a MyD88-dependent pathway (presumably initiated by TLR4) and a MyD88-independent pathway may contribute to the complete induction of TNF-α. This hypothesis concurs with the observation that, although the TLR4 mutation in the C3H/HeJ mouse blocks soluble LPS signalling, Gram-negative bacteria still stimulate cytokine production (perhaps through Toll-independent pathways)21. Thus, both genetic data and our results indicate that TLR4 may be the primary mediator of LPS signalling, whereas our data show that TLR2 principally mediates signals from yeast and Gram-positive bacteria in macrophages. Previously, human TLR2 has been implicated in LPS signalling in non-macrophage cell lines, and it not clear why our data, obtained in cells that are naturally LPS-responsive, differ22,23; however, our data concur with genetic evidence in mice and hamsters, in which a mutation in TLR4 abrogates LPS signalling whereas a mutation in TLR2 does not10,11,14. We have also shown that the natural mutation in the TLR4 gene in the C3H/HeJ LPS-hyporesponsive mouse (P712H) acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of TLR4 function. Notably, the corresponding proline-to-histidine mutation in TLR2 (P681H) also acts as a dominant-negative mutation in TLR2. This proline is conserved in all known mammalian Toll receptors, except TLR3 (ref. 7,8,9), and might couple Toll receptors to a common signalling pathway.

Figure 4: Expression of MyD88-DN blocks particle-induced TNF-α production but not particle internalization.

a, RAW-TT10 cells transiently expressing MyD88-DN were stimulated as indicated with zymosan, S. aureus, S. minnesota or LPS, and TNF-α production was measured. Using the regions as defined in Fig. 2e, the thin lines indicate TNF-α produced in stimulated, GFP-low cells, and the bold lines indicate TNF-α produced in stimulated, MyD88-DN-expressing cells (GFP-high). The dotted lines indicate background, unstimulated TNF-α production. b, Cells transiently expressing MyD88-DN were incubated with fluorescently labelled zymosan, S. aureus , or S. minnesota as indicated, and particle internalization was assessed by flow cytometry; y axes, relative cell number.

Macrophages are capable of detecting the nature of the pathogen within the phagocytic vacuole, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unknown1. Our data indicate that the toll-like receptors may be recruited to phagosomes, where they sample the contents and determine the nature of the pathogen; TLR2 detects Gram-positive bacteria and fungi, whereas TLR4 detects Gram-negative bacteria. Thus, specific Toll-like receptors may distinguish the contents of the phagosome and participate in the elaboration of an inflammatory response appropriate for defence against a specific pathogen.


Murine TLR2 cloning

Two mouse ESTs (Genbank AA863729 and D77677) with homology to the human TLR2 sequence were identified, and a 0.9-kilobase (kb) complementary DNA was generated by reverse transcription of RAW 264.7 total RNA using a primer spanning the stop codon in the first EST (5′-GGTGGAGAACCTAGGACTTTATTGC-3′). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out with the same primer, and the 5′ most homologous sequences in the second EST (5′-GCTCTATATTTCCAGAAATAAGCTG-3′). To obtain the complete open reading frame (ORF), 5′ rapid amplification of complementary DNA ends (RACE) was performed on RAW 264.7 RNA (Gibco-BRL). Products from 0.5 to 1.5 kb were amplified, cloned and sequenced, completing the murine TLR2 ORF (Genbank AF185284).

DNA expression vectors

The mammalian expression vector, pNeo/Tak, was constructed to combine expression of the tetracycline transactivator24 from a tetracycline-regulated promoter (pTet-Tak, Gibco-BRL) with neomycin selection. The neomycin resistance marker was from pcDNA3 (Invitrogen), and the remainder of the plasmid backbone was derived from pBluescript SK (Stratagene).

The expression vector pTIGZ2+ was assembled to direct tetracycline-regulated expression of a protein from the same messenger RNA transcript as GFP. In this vector, the tetracycline-regulated promoter from pTetSplice (Gibco-BRL) directed expression of a mRNA encoding the protein of interest followed by the cap-independent translational enhancer region of pCITE (Novagen) driving translation of enhanced GFP (from peGFP-N1, Clonetech). The polyadenylation signal and remainder of the vector backbone were from pcDNA3.1/Zeo (Invitrogen). During construction, the tetracycline-inducible promoter was modified to contain two binding sites for the tetracycline transactivator instead of seven.

The HA-TLR2 expression vector was constructed by amplifying the coding region of mouse TLR2 from amino acids R21–S784 (removing the endogenous signal peptide) by PCR, and cloning the fragment into a modified pDisplay (Invitrogen) which provides a signal peptide and a haemagglutinin A epitope. pDisplay had been modified by deletion of the PDGF transmembrane domain and replacement of the neomycin resistance cassette by one with zeocin resistance (pcDNA3.1/Zeo, Invitrogen). For single-cell TNF-α measurements, the HA-tagged TLR2 coding region was transferred from pDisplay to TIGZ2+. The TLR2 dominant-negative P681H mutation was generated by PCR and confirmed by sequencing. The MyD88 dominant-negative construct was generated by amplifying the MyD88 C-terminal coding region (amino acids 146–296) by PCR from cDNA of RAW 264.7 cells and cloning the fragment into TIGZ2+. The murine TLR4 coding region was amplified by RT-PCR from RAW cells (Genbank AF185285), and cloned into pTIGZ2+. The dominant-negative P712H mutation was generated by PCR and confirmed by sequencing, and the resulting coding region was cloned into pTIGZ2+. Murine CD14 was amplified by RT-PCR from RAW cells and cloned into the expression vector pcDNA3.1/Zeo (Invitrogen).


RAW 264.7 (ATCC# TIB-71) and CHO-K1 (ATCC# CRL-9618) cells were transfected as described25. All experiments were performed 24 h after transfection. For generation of a tetracycline transactivator-expressing RAW cell line, RAW 264.7 cells were transfected with pNeo/Tak, and stable cell lines were selected using 400 µg ml-1 G418 (Gibco-BRL). After 10 days of selection, the cells were cloned by limiting dilution, and one cell line (designated RAW-TT10) that showed good tetracycline-regulated expression from a subsequently transfected reporter plasmid was used for all experiments. Tetracycline was always absent from the media, resulting in strong activity of the tetracycline-regulated promoter.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

RAW cells were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy as described25. Cells grown on glass coverslips were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C with zymosan (Molecular Probes), fixed and permeabilized, and nonspecific sites were blocked by incubation in blocking buffer (PBS, 10% calf serum, 0.1% ovalbumin and 5 mM sodium azide). HA-tagged TLR2 was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody (HA.11, Babco) precleared against zymosan. Specific binding was detected with fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch). After mounting, the cells were observed by fluorescence microscopy using an Axiovert TV microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a cooled CCD camera (Princeton Instruments) and Metamorph imaging software (Universal Imaging).

Luciferase assays

CHO-K1 cells were transiently transfected with 2 µg of NF-κB reporter construct (ELAM-1 firefly luciferase26) and 0.2 µg of a construct directing expression of Renilla luciferase under control of the constitutively active β-actin promoter27, together with 3 µg of each of the expression constructs indicated in the text, and plated into 24-well tissue-culture plates. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were stimulated with 3 × 106 zymosan particles (Molecular Probes) per well for 5 h, and luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate samples and are representative of three independent experiments.

Detection of intracellular TNF-α

S. aureus (clinical isolate) and S. minnesota (ATCC#49284) were grown to saturation, heat killed and stored as frozen aliquots. For particle stimulation, the RAW cells were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with 3 × 106 zymosan (Molecular Probes), S. aureus or S. minnesota particles per well. After exposure to the particles, the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in the presence of 5 µg ml-1 brefeldin A to accumulate intracellular TNF-α. Where indicated, cells were exposed to 10 ng ml-1 LPS (S. minnesota R595, List), 10 µg ml-1 lipoteichoic acid (S. aureus, Sigma) or 10 µg ml-1 peptidoglycan (S. aureus, Fluka) with 5 µg ml-1 brefeldin A for 4 h at 37 °C. After blocking Fc-receptors with 2.4G2 hybridoma supernatant, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The cells were permeabilized and stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-mouse TNF-α (Pharmingen) diluted in 1% fetal calf serum and 0.1% saponin in PBS. After two washes, the cells were analysed by flow cytometry using a FACScan (Beckton Dickinson) and WinMDI software (Joseph Trotter, Scripps). Brefeldin A alone did not stimulate TNF-α production (data not shown).

Phagocytosis assay

Phagocytosis by RAW cells was measured by flow cytometry of cells that had ingested fluorescently labelled particles25. Zymosan, S. aureus or S. minnesota particles ( 3 × 106) labelled with tetramethylrhodamine were added to the macrophage monolayers and settled onto the cells by centrifugation. The cells were allowed to internalize the particles for 10 min at 37 °C, and uninternalized particles were washed away with PBS. For cells ingesting zymosan, remaining extracellular particles were dissolved by addition of 100 U ml-1 lyticase (Sigma) in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were resuspended in PBS + 1 mM EDTA, fixed in 1% formaldehyde, and analysed by flow cytometry. For cells ingesting bacteria, uninternalized bacteria were stripped from the cell surface by incubation in trypsin/EDTA for 5 min at room temperature, and the cells were fixed and analysed as above. It was confirmed by microscopy that the only remaining cell-associated fluorescently labelled particles had been internalized.


  1. 1

    Aderem,A. & Underhill,D. M. Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 593 –623 (1999).

  2. 2

    Medzhitov,R. & Janeway,C. A. Jr Self-defence: the fruit fly style. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 429–430 (1998).

  3. 3

    Hoffmann,J. A., Kafatos,F. C., Janeway,C. A. & Ezekowitz,R. A. Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science 284, 1313–1318 (1999).

  4. 4

    Lemaitre,B., Reichhart,J. M. & Hoffmann, J. A. Drosophila host defense: differential induction of antimicrobial peptide genes after infection by various classes of microorganisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14614– 14619 (1997).

  5. 5

    Eldon,E. et al. The Drosophila 18 wheeler is required for morphogenesis and has striking similarities to Toll. Development 120, 885–899 (1994).

  6. 6

    Williams,M. J., Rodriguez,A., Kimbrell,D. A. & Eldon,E. D. The 18-wheeler mutation reveals complex antibacterial gene regulation in Drosophila host defense. EMBO J. 16, 6120–6130 (1997).

  7. 7

    Chaudhary,P. M. et al. Cloning and characterization of two Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor-like genes TIL3 and TIL4: evidence for a multi-gene receptor family in humans. Blood 91, 4020–4027 (1998).

  8. 8

    Rock,F. L., Hardiman,G., Timans,J. C., Kastelein,R. A. & Bazan,J. F. A family of human receptors structurally related to Drosophila Toll. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 588–593 (1998).

  9. 9

    Takeuchi,O. et al. TLR6: a novel member of an expanding Toll-like receptor family. Gene 231, 59–65 (1999).

  10. 10

    Poltorak,A et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in TIr4 gene. Science 282, 2085 –2088 (1998).

  11. 11

    Qureshi,S. T. et al. Endotoxin-tolerant mice have mutations in toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4). J. Exp. Med. 189, 615– 625 (1999).

  12. 12

    Stahl,P. D. & Ezekowitz,R. A. The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 50–55 ( 1998).

  13. 13

    Hoshino,K. et al. Cutting edge: toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 162, 3749– 3752 (1999).

  14. 14

    Heine,H. et al. Cutting edge: cells that carry A null allele for toll-like receptor 2 are capable of responding to endotoxin. J. Immunol. 162, 6971–6975 (1999).

  15. 15

    Yoshimura,A. et al. Cutting edge: recognition of Gram-positive bacterial cell wall components by the innate immune system occurs via toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 163, 1–5 (1999).

  16. 16

    Schwandner,R., Dziarski,R., Wesche,H., Rothe,M. & Kirschning, C. J. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17406–17409 ( 1999).

  17. 17

    Medzhitov,R. et al. MyD88 is an adaptor protein in the hToll/IL-1 receptor family signaling pathways. Mol. Cell. 2, 253– 258 (1998).

  18. 18

    Muzio,M., Ni,J., Feng,P. & Dixit,V. M. IRAK (Pelle) family member IRAK-2 and MyD88 as proximal mediators of IL-1 signalling. Science 278, 1612–1615 ( 1997).

  19. 19

    Wesche,H., Henzel,W. J., Schillinglaw, W., Li,S. & Cao,Z. MyD88: an adapter that recruits IRAK to the IL-1 receptor complex. Immunity 7, 837–847 (1997).

  20. 20

    Adachi,O. et al. Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL-1- and IL-18-mediated function. Immunity 9, 143–150 (1998).

  21. 21

    Freudenberg,M. A. & Galanos,C. Tumor necrosis factor α mediates lethal activity of killed gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in D-galactosamine-treated mice. Infect. Immun. 59, 2110–2115 ( 1991).

  22. 22

    Kirschning,C. J., Wesche,H., Merrill Ayres, T. & Rothe,M. Human toll-like receptor 2 confers responsiveness to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2091– 2097 (1998).

  23. 23

    Yang,R. B. et al. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced cellular signalling. Nature 395, 284– 288 (1998).

  24. 24

    Gossen,M. & Bujard,H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5547–5551 (1992).

  25. 25

    Underhill,D. M., Chen,J., Allen,L. A. & Aderem,A. MacMARCKS is not essential for phagocytosis in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33619–33623 (1998).

  26. 26

    Schindler,U. & Baichwal,V. R. Three NF-κB binding sites in the human E-selectin gene required for maximal tumor necrosis factor α-induced expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5820– 5831 (1994).

  27. 27

    Sweetser,M. T. et al. The roles of nuclear factor of activated T cells and ying-yang 1 in activation-induced expression of the interferon-γ promoter in T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34775– 34783 (1998).

Download references


Supported in part by grants from the NIH (A.A., C.B.W. and A.S.) and from the cystic fibrosis foundation (C.B.W. and A.H.). D.M.U. is an Irvington Institute postdoctoral fellow.

Author information

Correspondence to Alan Aderem.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Underhill, D., Ozinsky, A., Hajjar, A. et al. The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens. Nature 402, 39–43 (1999) doi:10.1038/35005543

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.