There are two views about the nature of consonants and vowels. One view holds that they are categorically distinct objects that play a fundamental role in the construction of syllables in speech production1,2,3. The other view is that they are convenient labels for distinguishing between peak (vowel) and non-peak (consonant) parts of a continuous stream of sound that varies in sonority (roughly the degree of openness of the vocal apparatus during speech)4,5,6, or that they are summary labels for bundles of feature segments7,8. Taking the latter view, consonants and vowels do not have an independent status in language processing. Here we provide evidence for the possible categorical distinction between consonants and vowels in the brain. We report the performance of two Italian-speaking aphasics who show contrasting, selective difficulties in producing vowels and consonants. Their performance in producing individual consonants is independent of the sonority value and feature properties of the consonants. This pattern of results suggests that consonants and vowels are processed by distinct neural mechanisms, thereby providing evidence for their independent status in language production.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
McCarthy, J. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 373–418 (1981).
Clements, G. N. & Keyser, S. J. CV phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable LI Monograph Series no. 9 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983).
Yip, M. Reduplication and C-V skeleta in Chinese secret languages. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 637–661 (1982).
Selkirk, E. in The Structure of Phonological Representations (eds van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N.) Part II (Foris, Dordrecht, 1982).
Goldsmith, J. A. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology (Blackwell, Oxford, 1990).
MacNeilage, P. F. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 499–546 (1998).
Kenstowicz, M. Phonology in Generative Grammar (Blackwell, Oxford, 1994).
Stevens, K. Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998).
Miceli, G., Laudanna, A., Burani, C. & Capasso, R. Batteria per l'Analisi dei Deficit Afasici (Centro di Promozione e Sviluppo dell' Assistenza Geriatrica, Roma, 1994).
Romani, C., Granà, A. & Semenza, C. More errors on vowels than consonants: An unusual case of conduction aphasia. Brain Language 55, 144–146 (1996).
Blumstein, S. E. in Syllables and Segments (eds Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B.) 189–200 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
Canter, G. J., Trost, J. E. & Burns, M. S. Contrasting speech patterns in apraxia of speech and phonemic paraphasia. Brain Lang. 24, 204–222 (1985).
Romani, C. & Calabrese, A. Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain Language 64, 83–121 (1998).
Roelofs, A. Phonological segments and features as planning units in speech production. Lang. Cogn. Processes 14, 173–200 (1999).
Boatman, D., Hall, C., Goldstein, M. H., Lesser, R. & Gordon, B. Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: as revealed by direct cortical electrical interference. Cortex 33, 83–98 (1997).
Buckingham, H. The scan-copier mechanism and the positional level of language production: evidence from phonemic paraphasia. Cogn. Sci. 10, 195–217 (1986).
Beland, R., Caplan, D. & Nespoulous, J.-L. The role of abstract phonological representations in word production: evidence from phonemic paraphasias. J. Neurolinguistics 5, 125–164 (1990).
Christman, S. S. Uncovering phonological regularity in neologisms: contributions of sonority theory. Clinic. Linguist. Phonetics 6, 219–247 (1992).
Ramus, F. & Mehler, J. Language identification with suprasegmental cues: a study based on speech resynthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 512–521 (1999).
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. Prosodic Phonology (Foris, Dordrecht, 1986).
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A. & Meyer, A. S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 1–75 (1999).
This research was supported by a grant from the NIH. We thank S. Blumstein, A. Costa, P. Jusczyk, J. Mehler, V. Savova, N. Schiller and K. Stevens for helpful suggestions, and K. Domoto-Reilly for her help in the scoring of the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R. et al. Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature 403, 428–430 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35000206
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)
Is the consonant bias specifically human? Long–Evans rats encode vowels better than consonants in words
Animal Cognition (2019)