Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Scientific Correspondence
  • Published:

Reply

How molecular motors work in muscle

Abstract

Howard repliesHuxley points out that there is a discrepancy between recent mechanical recordings from single myosin molecules in vitro and earlier mechanical measurements from muscle fibres in vivo: the single-molecule recordings indicate a working distance and maximum duty ratio of 4-6 nm and 10-20%, respectively, only about half the values deduced from the fibrestudies. Although it is possible that technical limitations, for example misorientated heads, make the single-molecule recordings suspect, I argued in my ReviewArticle1 that the discrepancy might be only an apparent one. In particular, the smaller working distance does conform to many of the results from muscle, and the lower duty ratio can even provide a more satisfactory explanation for some of the experiments with muscle fibres. Huxley challenges this view by discussing three additional observations from fibres. But I believe that these too are mainly consistent with the smaller working stroke and duty ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Howard, J. Nature 389, 561–567 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Finer, J. T., Simmons, R. M. & Spudich, J. A. Nature 368, 113–119 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ford, L. E., Huxley, A. F. & Simmons, R. M. J. Physiol. 269, 441–515 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huxley, A. F. & Tideswell, S. J. Musc. Res. Cell Motil. 17, 507–511 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg, E., Hill, T. L. & Chen, Y. Biophys. J. 29, 195–227 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ford, L. E., Huxley, A. F. & Simmons, R. M. J. Physiol. 361, 131–150 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yanagida, T., Arata, T. & Oosawa, F. Nature 316, 366–369 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Higuchi, H. & Goldman, Y. E. Nature 352, 352–354 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huxley, A. F. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 7, 255–318 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lovell, S. J., Knight, P. J. & Harrington, W. F. Nature 293, 664–666 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yanagida, T., Arata, T. & Oosawa, F. Nature 352, 352–354 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, J. How molecular motors work in muscle. Nature 391, 239–240 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/34569

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/34569

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing