Letter | Published:

A numerical experiment on the chaotic behaviour of the Solar System

Nature volume 338, pages 237238 (16 March 1989) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

LAPLACE and Lagrange made an essential contribution to the study of the stability of the Solar System by proving analytically that, to first order in the masses, inclinations and eccentricities of their orbits, the planets move quasiperiodically. Since then, many analytic quasiperiodic solutions have been sought to higher order1–10.1 have recently constructed an extensive analytic system of averaged differential equations containing the secular evolution of the orbits of the eight main planets, accurate to second order in the planetary masses and to fifth order in eccentricity and inclination, and including corrections from general relativity and the Moon8–10. Here I describe the results of a numerical integration of this system, extending backwards over 200 million years. The solution is chaotic, with a maximum Lyapunov exponent that reaches the surprisingly large value of 1/5 Myr–1. The motion of the Solar System is thus shown to be chaotic, not quasiperiodic. In particular, predictability of the orbits of the inner planets, including the Earth, is lost within a few tens of millions of years. This does not mean that after such a short timespan we will see catastrophic events such as a crossing of the orbits of Venus and Earth; but the traditional tools of quantitative celestial mechanics (numerical integrations or analytical theories), which aim at unique solutions from given initial conditions, will fail to predict such events. The problem of the stability of the Solar System will have to be set up again, and the qualitative methods initiated by Poincare definitely need to replace quantitative methods in this analysis.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Astr. J. 17(11), 81–87 (1897).

  2. 2.

    & Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem. 13(2), 81–107 (1950).

  3. 3.

    Analytical Algorithms of Celestial Mechanics (Nauka, Moscow; in Russian) (1980).

  4. 4.

    Astr. Astrophys. 30, 141–154 (1974).

  5. 5.

    Astr. Astrophys. 54, 93–112 (1977).

  6. 6.

    thesis, Lille (1979).

  7. 7.

    Celes. Mech. 26, 25–39 (1982).

  8. 8.

    thesis, Observatoire de Paris (1984).

  9. 9.

    Astr. Astrophys. 144, 133–146 (1985).

  10. 10.

    Astr. Astrophys. 157, 59–70 (1986).

  11. 11.

    Méthodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Celeste Vol. 1 (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1892).

  12. 12.

    Méthodes Nouvelles de la Mécanique Celeste Vol. 2 (Gauthier-Villare, Paris 1893).

  13. 13.

    Méthodes Mathématiques de la Mécanique Classique (MIR, Moscow, 1976).

  14. 14.

    , & Astr. Pap. Am. Ephem. 22(1), 1–42 (1973).

  15. 15.

    & Celes. Mech. 34, 203–217 (1984).

  16. 16.

    , , & Nature 319, 386–388 (1986).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Astr. J. 92, 176–194 (1986).

  18. 18.

    , & Astr. Astrophys. 181, 182–194 (1987).

  19. 19.

    & Science 241, 433–437 (1988).

  20. 20.

    , & Astr. Astrophys. 125, 150–167 (1983).

  21. 21.

    Astr. Astrophys. 198, 341–362 (1988).

  22. 22.

    in Proc. 10th ERAM of the IAU Vol. 3 (ed. Sidlichovsky, M.) 95–98 (1987).

  23. 23.

    , & , Astr. Astrophys. (in the press).

  24. 24.

    , , & Meccanica March 1980, 9–30.

  25. 25.

    in Stability of the Solar Systems and its Minor Natural and Artificial Bodies (ed. Szebehely, V. G.) 265–282 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).

  26. 26.

    Berger, A., Imbrie, J., Hays, J., Kukla, G. & Saltzman, B. (eds) Milankovitch and Climate (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. SCMC du Bureau des Longitudes, UA 707 du CNRS, 77 Avenue Denfert-Rochereau, F75014 Paris, France

    • J. Laskar

Authors

  1. Search for J. Laskar in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/338237a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.