Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Geomagnetic intensity as evaluated from ancient Chinese pottery

Abstract

Past values for the geomagnetic intensity may be obtained by laboratory analysis of the thermoremanent magnetization carried by clay baked in ancient times. From global averages1–3 of such determinations it is commonly accepted that the intensity in any given region went through a broad maximum about 2,000 years ago, reaching a level 50% higher than at present. Here we present results obtained from a wide range of Chinese pottery, spanning the interval from 4000 BC to the present, indicating that the field behaviour was more complex. The intensity was high between 1500 and 1000 BC and again in the first half of the first millennium AD. Comparison with results reported4,5 for Western Asia, Egypt and Crete suggests that these high values are due to non-dipole disturbances in the geomagnetic field, consistent with long-term records6–8 of the cosmogenic radioisotopes 14C and 10Be.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1. Smith, P. J. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 12, 213–362 (1967). 2. Cox, A. / geophys. Res. 73, 3257–60 (1968). 3. McElhinny, M. W. & Senanayake, W. E. /. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 34, 39–51 (1982). 4. Aitken, M. J., Allsop, A. L., Bussell, G. D. & Winter, M. B. Nature 310, 306–308 (1984). 5. Aitken, M. J., Alcock, P. A., Bussell, G. D. & Shaw, C. J. in Geomagnetism of Baked Clays and Recent Sediments (eds Creer, K. M., Tucholka, P. & Barton C. E.) 122–127 (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1983). 6. Stuiver, M. & Pearson, G. W. Radiocarbon 28, 805–838 (1986). 7. Pearson, G. W. & Stuiver, M. Radiocarbon 28, 839–862 (1986). 8. Beer, J. et al. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B5, 380–384 (1984). 9. Thellier, E. & Thellier, O. Ann. Geophys. 15, 285–367 (1959). 10. Aitken, M. J., Alcock, P. A., Bussell, G. D. & Shaw, C. J. Archaeometry 23, 53–64 (1981). 11. Aitken, M. J., Allsop, A. L., Bussell, G .D. & Winter, M. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 38,1355–1363 (1986). 12. Barton, C. E., Merrill, R. T. & Barbetti, M. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 20, 96–110 (1979). 13. Bullard, E. C., Freedman, C., Gellman, H. & Nixon, J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 243,67–92 (1950).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quing-Yun, W., Wei-Xi, Z., Dong-Jie, L. et al. Geomagnetic intensity as evaluated from ancient Chinese pottery. Nature 328, 330–333 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/328330a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/328330a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing