Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Relation to solar activity of intense aurorae in sunlight and darkness

Nature volume 393, pages 342–344 (1998)Cite this article

Abstract

The oldest documented1,2 relationship between the number of sunspots (the solar cycle) and terrestrial effects is the increased frequency of aurorae in the period immediately after the solar maximum (the peak of the number of sunspots). This correlation is, however, based only on observations of the relatively rare events of ‘great aurorae’, which are those that reach mid-latitudes or lower. The overwhelming majority of intense aurorae, and therefore most of the energy put into the ionosphere, occurs at high latitudes, where aurorae appear nightly. Here we report the global frequency of aurorae as a function of solar cycle, determined by data from the US Air Force Defense Meteorological Satellite Program. We find that, contrary to expectations, the total number of intense aurorae is uncorrelated with solar activity in darkness, and is negatively correlated with solar activity in sunlit conditions. These findings imply a causal relationship between aurorae and ionospheric conductivity (the latter is maximal at solar maximum) and therefore indicate that the occurrence of intense aurorae is a discharge phenomenon, similar to lightning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mean surface area covered by intense (⩾5 erg cm−2 s−1) aurorae over a 12-year.
Figure 2: Mean surface area covered by intense auroral arcs as an explicit function of F10.7 daily value, which is a proxy for ionizing solar radiation.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schröder, W. Das Phänomen des Polarlichts (Wissenschaftliche Buchgessellschaft, Darmstadt, (1984)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlain, J. W. The Physics of Aurora and Airglow (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, reprinted (1996)).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barth, C. A. in The Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere: A Review of Experiment and Theory (ed. R. M. Johnson, R. M. & Killeen, T. L.) 225–233 (American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, (1995)).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Newell, P. T., Meng, C.-I. & Lyons, K. M. Suppression of discrete aurora by sunlight. Nature 381, 766–767 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Newell, P. T., Lyons, K. M. & Meng, C.-I. Alarge survey of electron acceleration events. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 2599–2614 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy, D. A. et al. Report no. AFGL-TR-84-0317 (Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Boston, MA, (1984)).

  7. Evans, D. S. The observations of a near monoenergetic flux of auroral electrons. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2315–2323 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmussen, C. E., Schunk, R. W. & Wickwar, V. B. Aphotochemical equilibrium model for ionospheric conductivity. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9831–9840 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Borovsky, J. E. Auroral arc thicknesses as predicted by various theories. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 6101–6138 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lyons, L. R. Generation of large-scale regions of auroral currents, electric potentials, and precipitation by the divergence of the convection electric field. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 17–24 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Block, L. P. & Fälthammar, C.-G. in Auroral Physics (eds Meng, C.-I., Rycroft, M. J. & Frank, L. A.) 109–118 (Cambridge Univ. Press, (1991)).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lysak, R. J. Feedback instability of the ionospheric resonant cavity. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 1553–1568 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Hardy (Phillips Laboratory) and colleagues for designing and building the DMSP particle detectors and for sharing the data. The DMSP data were obtained from NOAA in Boulder, Colorado and from D. Hardy; the F10.7 data were obtained from NOAA. IMP-8 solar-wind data are from Goddard Space Flight Center, courtesy of R. Lepping and A. Lazarus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, 20723-6099, Maryland, USA

    Patrick T. Newell, Ching-I. Meng & Simon Wing

Authors
  1. Patrick T. Newell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ching-I. Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon Wing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, P., Meng, CI. & Wing, S. Relation to solar activity of intense aurorae in sunlight and darkness. Nature 393, 342–344 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/30682

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/30682

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing