Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Why large earthquakes do not nucleate at shallow depths

Abstract

Although by definition tectonic earthquakes may nucleate anywhere within the seismogenic layer, in almost all cases those earthquakes that become large nucleate near the base of the seismogenic layer. Because frictional strength and stress-drop should increase with depth and in situ stress measurements suggest that the ambient stress increases with depth, we have examined spontaneous rupture models with gradients of both average stress-drop and average strength relative to ambient stress to determine whether this explains the observed phenomena. We report here that ruptures that are nucleated with in the low stress-drop (shallow) regions of the model are inhibited from propagating, but those that are nucleated within the high stress-drop regions can propagate over the entire fault plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelleher, J., Sykes, L. & Oliver, J. J. geophys. Res. 78, 2547–2585 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sibson, R. H. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 72, 151–163 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Byerlee, J. D. Geofis. pura appl. 116, 615–626 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Byerlee, J. D. Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. 7, 577–582 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholz, C. H., Molnar, P. M. & Johnson, T. J. geophys. Res. 77, 6392–6406 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boatwright, J. Terra Cognita 2, 166 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGarr, M., Zoback, D. & Hanks, T. C. J. geophys. Res. 87, 7797–7806 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Das, S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 62, 591–604 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 67, 375–393 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burridge, R. & Halliday, G. S. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 25, 261–283 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Das, S. & Aki, K. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 50, 643–668 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanks, T. C. J. geophys. Res. 79, 1215–1229 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. House, L. & Boatwright, J. J. geophys. Res. 85, 7151–7165 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S., Scholz, C. Why large earthquakes do not nucleate at shallow depths. Nature 305, 621–623 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/305621a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/305621a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing