Abstract
Schemes to dispose of high-level radioactive waste by vitrification and subsequent burial call for an appraisal of the consequences of groundwater encountering the waste glass1. Glass dissolution rates are influenced not only by properties of the glass and solvent themselves but also by properties of the combination such as the glass surface area to solvent volume ratio2. Although pressure may affect glass dissolution rates, it has not received unambiguous explicit experimental investigation. A simple experiment has been designed to determine dissolution rates at room temperature of glass samples subject to very high pressure in a centrifuge. The results reported here show that the dissolution rates for Na and Si increase slightly with pressure, but that at a pressure of 160 MPa (>1,500 atm) these dissolution rates are still of the same order as those at atmospheric pressure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McCarthy, G. J. et al. Nature 273, 216–217 (1978).
Clark, D. E. & Yen-Bower, E. Lue. Surface Sci. 100, 53–70 (1980).
Durney, D. W. Nature 235, 315–317 (1972).
Morrison, S. R. in The Chemical Physics of Surfaces, 263–277 (Plenum, New York, 1977).
Doremus, R. H. J. Non-Crystalline Solids 19, 137–144 (1975).
Budd, S. M. Phys. Chem. Glasses 2, 111–114 (1961).
Paul, A. J. Mater. Sci. 12, 2246–2268 (1977).
Cousens, D. R. et al. Radioactive Waste Management 2, 143–168 (1981).
Donath, F. A. Nucl. Chem. Waste Management 1, 103–110 (1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, R., Segall, R. Pressure dependence of glass dissolution and nuclear waste disposal. Nature 299, 140–141 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299140a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299140a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.