Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Inability of tolerant males to sire tolerant progeny

Abstract

Recent data of Gorczynski and Steele suggested that male mice made tolerant of an allogeneic strain by the neonatal injection of hybrid lymphomyeloid cells may, by a presumably genetic mechanism, pass on this operationally similar form of hyporesponsiveness to their progeny1,2—the progeny have inherited an acquired characteristic. Their theory, proposed to account for the inheritance of an acquired characteristic, uses a RNA tumour virus that transfers to the spermatogenic germinal epithelium DNA coding for the gene products of the foreign alloantigens. This is possible because the tolerant mouse is chimaeric and contains small numbers of foreign lymphomyeloid cells. Thus, the virus transfers genetic information for transplantation antigens from the chimaeric foreign cells to the germinal epithelium of the host. The progeny of the tolerant male are themselves tolerant because they have received DNA coding for the foreign antigens from paternal sperm. The progeny are tolerant because foreign is now ‘self’. I have now repeated these experiments in a strain combination of rats, DA tolerant of PVG, and found no hyporesponsiveness to the PVG strain in the progeny of tolerant DA males.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gorczynski, R. M. & Steele, E. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 2871–2875 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorczynski, R. M. & Steele, E. J. Nature 289, 678–681 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Billingham, R. E., Brent, L. & Medawar, P. B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B239, 357–414 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, R. N. & Howard, J. C. J. Immun. 125, 2289–2294 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gorczynski, R. M., Macrae, S. & Till, J. E. Scand. J. Immun. 7, 453–465 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, D. B., Silvers, W. K. & Nowell, P. C. J. exp. Med. 126, 655–665 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorsch, S. & Roser, B. J. exp. Med. 145, 1144–1157 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, R. N. & Powell, A. E. J. exp. Med. 146, 899–904 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Butcher, G. W. & Howard, J. C. Nature 266, 362–364 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Antczak, D. F., Brown, D. & Howard, J. C. Cell Immun. 43, 304–316 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R. Inability of tolerant males to sire tolerant progeny. Nature 292, 767–768 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/292767a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/292767a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing