Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence from the asymmetry of fast-spreading ridges that the axial topographic high is due to extensional stresses

Abstract

Along fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges such as the East Pacific Rise, there is an axial topographic high, 5–20 km wide, which stands 200–400 m above the background slope caused by thermally induced seafloor subsidence. There are also smaller topographic lows flanking the axial high along most of the East Pacific Rise from 20° S to 15° N. The existence of these lows is predicted by models of the origin of the axial high. One model postulates that the axial high is created by buoyant uplift from a narrow zone ofconcentrated partial melt extending tens of kilometres down into the mantle1,2,3,4. Another model requires no such buoyant zone, suggesting instead that the axial high is generated by dynamic, extensional stresses in the lithosphere and shallow asthenosphere5. Here we show that the observed asymmetry of the flanking lows can be used to distinguish between these two proposed mechanisms. Although either model can be adapted to match the asymmetry on individual profiles, the along-axis variation in degree of symmetry favours the model of dynamic, extensional stresses for the origin of the axial high and its flanking lows.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Two mechanisms that can produce an asymmetric axial high and flanking lows at the fast-spreading East Pacific Rise.
Figure 2: Characteristic profiles of residual topography and gravity of the EPR between 15° and 19° S.
Figure 3: The East Pacific Rise from the Easter Microplate to North America.
Figure 4: Degree of topographic asymmetry as a function of asymmetry in the models.
Figure 5: Along-axis variations in properties of the East Pacific Rise.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, D. S. Focused upwelling beneath mid-ocean ridges: Evidence from seamount formation and isostatic compensation of topography. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113, 41–55 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, X. & Cochran, J. R. Gravity anomalies, isostasy, and mantle flow at the East Pacific Rise crest. J.Geophys. Res. 98, 19505–19531 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Magde, L. S. et al. Crustal and upper mantle contribution to the axial gravity anomaly at the southern East Pacific Rise. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3747–3766 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eberle, M. A., Forsyth, D. W. & Parmentier, E. M. Constraints on a buoyant model for the formation of the axial topographic high on the East Pacific Rise. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 12291–12307 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eberle, M. A. & Forsyth, D. W. An alternative, dynamic model of the axial topographic high at fast-spreading ridges. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 12309–12320 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buck, W. R. & Su, W. Focused mantle upwelling below mid-ocean ridges due to feedback between viscosity and melting. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 641–644 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, D. R. & Stevenson, D. J. Aself-consistent model of melting, magma migration and buoyancy-driven circulation beneath mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 2973–2988 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sotin, C. & Parmentier, E. M. Dynamical consequences of compositional and thermal density stratification beneath spreading centers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 835–838 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Su, W. & Buck, W. R. Buoyancy effects on mantle flow under mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 12191–12205 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gripp, A. E. & Gordon, R. G. Current plate velocities relative to the hotspots incorporating the NUVEL-1 global plate motion model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 1109–1112 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cormier, M.-H. & Macdonald, K. C. East Pacific Rise 18–19° S: Asymmetric spreading and ridge reorientation by ultrafast migration of axial discontinuities. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 543–564 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cochran, J. R. Variations in subsidence rates along intermediate and fast spreading mid-ocean ridges. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 87, 421–454 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forsyth, D. W., Dorman, L. M., Phipps Morgan, J. & Shen, Y. Anisotropy and lateral variations in shear wave velocity from propagation of Rayleigh waves across the MELT array. EOS Transactions AGU 77, 652–653 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sandwell, D. T. & Smith, W. H. F. Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. J.Geophys. Res. 102, 10039–10054 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phipps Morgan, J., Parmentier, E. M. & Lin, J. Mechanisms for the origin of mid-ocean ridge axial topography: Implications for the thermal and mechanical structure of accreting plate boundaries. J.Geophys. Res. 92, 12823–12836 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Scheirer was helpful in obtaining some of the bathymetry and gravity data used for this study; M. Parmentier assisted us in formulating the conceptual and numerical models. This work was supported by the US NSF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Eberle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eberle, M., Forsyth, D. Evidence from the asymmetry of fast-spreading ridges that the axial topographic high is due to extensional stresses. Nature 394, 360–363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/28596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/28596

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing