Abstract
The tendency for large deer species to have relatively big antlers for their body size has been explained as the result of an inevitable evolutionary trend leading to increased antler size1–4, of linkage between genetic factors influencing body size and relative antler size5, of the increased need for larger deer to lose heat6 and of an increased reliance of larger deer species on displays to avoid fighting7. Here we test an alternative hypothesis: that large deer species tend to be more polygynous than smaller ones and that intense inter-male competition in large species has led to the development of relatively large antlers. Analysis of comparative data8–42 confirms two predictions based on this hypothesis: (1) that large deer species form bigger breeding groups than small ones; and (2) that deer which form large breeding groups have relatively larger antlers for their body size than those that form smaller ones. However, antler size is not proportional to body size among species that form breeding groups of similar size, indicating that other factors must also be involved.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Johnston, H. British Mammals (Hutchinson, London, 1903).
Reynolds, S. H. The Giant Deer: a Monograph of the British Pleistocene Mammalia Vol. 3, part 3 (Palaeontographical Society, London, 1929).
Lull, R. S. Organic Evolution (Macmillan, New York, 1924).
Common, R. H. Irish Nat. J. 4, 187–188 (1933).
Huxley, J. S. Problems of Relative Growth (MacVeagh, London, 1932).
Stonehouse, B. Nature 218, 870–872 (1968).
Gould, S. J. Evolution 28, 191–220 (1974).
Ward, D. Records of Big Game 9th edn (Roland Ward, London, 1969).
Whitehead, G. H. Deer of the World (Constable, London, 1972).
Barette, C. Mammalia 41, 1–29 (1977).
McCullough, D. R. Status of Larger Mammals in Taiwan (Tourism Bureau, Taipai, Taiwan, 1974).
Chapman, D. & Chapman, N. Fallow Deer: their History, Distribution and Biology (Dalton, Lavenham, 1975).
Schaller, G. B. The Deer and the Tiger (University of Chicago Press, 1967).
Boonsong, L. & McNeely, D. Mammals of Thailand (Association Conservation of Wildlife,Bangkok, 1977).
Blouch, R. A. & Atmosoedirdjo, S. in Threatened Deer, 129–142 (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1978).
Panwar, H. S. in Threatened Deer, 143–158 (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1978).
Darling, F. F. A Herd of Red Deer (Oxford University Press, London, 1937).
Gibson, R. M. & Guinness, F. E. Anim. Behav. (in the press).
de Vos, A., Brokx, P. & Geist, V. Am. Midl. Nat. Monogr. 77, 390–417 (1967).
Struhsaker, T. T. Z. Tierpsychol. 24, 80–114 (1967).
McCullough, D. R. The Tule Elk: its History, Behavior and Ecology (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969).
Sinh, Ranjit J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 72, 243–255 (1975).
Long-hui, H. & Chan-ho, L. Zool. Mag. 3, 39–40 (1974).
Horwood, M. T. & Masters, E. H. Sika Deer (British Deer Soc. Publ. No. 3, Broadwater Press, Welwyn Garden City, 1970).
Lowe, V. P. W. in The Handbook of British Mammals 2nd edn (eds Corbet, G. B. & Southern, H. N.) 423–428 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1977).
Schaller, G. B. & Harmer, A. Zool. Gart., N. F. 48, 1–15 (1978).
Dasmann, R. F. & Taber, R. D. J. Mammal. 37, 143–164 (1956).
Cowan, I. McT. in The Deer of North America (ed. Taylor, W. P.) (Stackpole, Harrisburg, 1956).
Hirth, D. H. Wildl. Monogr. 53, 1–55 (1977).
Prior, R. The Roe Deer of Cranborne Chase: An Ecological Survey (Oxford University Press, London, 1968).
Bramley, P. S. J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 11, 43–70 (1970).
Peterson, R. L. North American Moose (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1955).
Geist, V. Behaviour 20, 378–416 (1963).
Houston, D. B. in The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management (eds Geist, V. & Walther, F.) (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1974).
Henshaw, J. Anim. Behav. 18, 256–258 (1970).
Bergerud, A. T. in The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management (eds Geist, V. & Walther, F.) (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1974).
Povilitis, A. in Threatened Deer, 109–128 (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1978).
Roe, N. A. & Rees, W. E. J. Mammal. 57, 722–730 (1976).
Rose, N. A. Red Data Book Mimeograph Report (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Red Data Book, Cambridge, 1975).
Flook, D. R. Can. Wildl. Sen. Rep. Ser. No. 11 (1970).
Wood, A. J., Cowan, I. & Nordan, H. C. Can. J. Zool. 40, 593–603 (1962).
Andersen, J. Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 2, 127–155 (1975).
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Gibson, R. M. & Guinness, F. E. Anim. Behav. 27, 211–225 (1979).
Geist, V. Mountain Sheep (University of Chicago Press, 1971).
Topinski, P. Acta theriologica 19, 509–511 (1974).
Henshaw, J. Nature 224, 1036–1037 (1969).
Bubenik, A. B. Deer 8, 208–214 (1968).
Suttie, J. M. J. Zool. 190, 217–224 (1980).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S. D. Behaviour 69, 145–170 (1979).
Lincoln, G. A. J. Zool. 163, 105–123 (1971).
Lincoln, G. A. J. exp. Zool. 182, 233–250 (1972).
Geist, V. J. Quat. Res. 1, 283–315 (1971).
Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Harvey, P. H. Nature 273, 191–195 (1978).
Geist, V. Behaviour 27, 175–214 (1966).
Geist, V. in Aggression, Dominance and Individual Spacing (eds Kramer, L., Pliner, P. & Alloway, T.) (Plenum, New York, 1978).
Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. Science 197, 215–223 (1977).
Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., Noonan, K. M. & Sherman, P. W. in Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior (eds Chagnon, N. A. & Irons, W.) (Duxbury, Massachusetts, 1979).
Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. J. Zool. 186, 475–486 (1978).
Jolicoeur, P. & Mosiman, J. E. Biometrie-Praximotrie 9, 121–140 (1968).
Morrison, D. F. Multivariate Statistical Methods (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967).
Western, D. Afr. J. Ecol. 17, 185–204 (1979).
Geist, V. in Behaviour of Ungulates in Relation to Management (eds Geist, V. & Walther, F.) (Int. Un. Conserv. Nat., Morges, 1974).
Geist, V. Am. Zool. 14, 205–220 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clutton-Brock, T., Albon, S. & Harvey, P. Antlers, body size and breeding group size in the Cervidae. Nature 285, 565–567 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/285565a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/285565a0
This article is cited by
-
Antler Allometry, the Irish Elk and Gould Revisited
Evolutionary Biology (2024)
-
Brains vs Brawn: Relative brain size is sexually dimorphic amongst weapon-bearing ruminants
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2024)
-
Variation of antlers in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags: repeatability, age and side effects
European Journal of Wildlife Research (2023)
-
Soil nutrients and deer density affect antler size of the Carpathian red deer
Mammalian Biology (2022)
-
Female preference for super-sized male ornaments and its implications for the evolution of ornament allometry
Evolutionary Ecology (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
