Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Geophysical constraints on structure and emplacement of Shap granite

Abstract

To understand Caledonian granite genesis in Britain it is essential that studies into the two-dimensional surface features of intrusions continue into the third dimension using various geophysical techniques. The characteristics of continental crust stabilised in the British Caledonian have been discussed elsewhere1 and models for their evolution suggest a derivation direct from the mantle or by partial fusion of the oceanic crust. The Shap granite is no exception : geochronologically, geochemically and palaeomagnetically2 it belongs to the Devonian group of Lake District granites, including the Eskdale, Skiddaw and Sub-Pennine Weardale intrusions. This suite yields the low initial Sr87/Sr86 ratios ( 0.706) (P. J. O'Connor, G. C. B. and M. D. Max, in preparation) which are characteristic of mantle fusion followed by limited crustal scavenging. The Shap intrusion occurs in the eastern Lake District and outcrops as an irregular oval measuring 2.8 km east–west and 2km north–south. It is a porphyritic adamellite3 dated 393 ± 11 Myr (ref. 4) and occurs at the junction between Ordovician Borrowdale volcanics and Silurian Brathay flags. The granite possesses a broad metasomatic aureole containing grossular and epidote. There has been debate concerning the subsurface shape of the intrusion, which may be lopolith5 or cone-shaped with depth. The gravity survey of the Lake District6 strongly suggests the latter, but modelling was based on only 14 stations along a single linear traverse of the granite. A stock-like body, extending to 8 km depth, gave a satisfactory model at that time. Here we report the combined observations of ground-based gravity and magnetic field surveys which apply to the structure of the intrusion and its aureole rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, G. C. & Hennessy, J., Phil. Trans. R. Soc., Lond. (in the press).

  2. Piper, J. D. A., McCook, A. S., Watkins, K. P., Brown, G. C. & Morris, W. A. Geol. J. (in the press).

  3. Grantham, R. Proc. geol. Ass. 39, 299–331 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, P. E. et al. Proc. Yorks. geol. Soc. 34, 331–342 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marr, J. E. Geology of the Lake District (Cambridge University Press, 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bott, M. H. P. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 130, 309–331 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cordell, L. & Henderson, R. G. Geophysics 33, 596–601 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aeromagnetic map of Great Britain, Sheet 1 (I.G.S. London, 1965).

  9. Harker, A. & Marr, J. E. Q. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 47, 266–328 (1891).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heirtzler, J. R., Peter, G., Talwani, M. & Zurflueh, E. G. Tech. Rep. No. 6 (Lamont Geological Observatory, Columbia University, 1962).

  11. Green, J. F. N. Proc. geol. Ass. 26, 195–223 (1915).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moseley, F. Q. J. geol. Soc., Lond. 116, 55–84 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitton, J. G. & Hughes, D. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 8, 223–228 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LOCKE, C., BROWN, G. Geophysical constraints on structure and emplacement of Shap granite. Nature 272, 526–528 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/272526a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/272526a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing