Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Quantification of dust-forced heating of the lower troposphere

Abstract

Aerosols may affect climate through the absorption and scattering of solar radiation and, in the case of large dust particles, by interacting with thermal radiation1,2,3. But whether atmospheric temperature responds significantly to such forcing has not been determined; feedback mechanisms could increase or decrease the effects of the aerosol forcing. Here we present an indirect measure of the tropospheric temperature response by explaining the ‘errors’ in the NASA/Goddard model/data-assimilation system. These errors, which provide information about physical processes missing from the predictive model, have monthly mean patterns that bear a striking similarity to observed patterns of dust over the eastern tropical North Atlantic Ocean. This similarity, together with the high correlations between latitudinal location of inferred maximum atmospheric heating rates and that of the number of dusty days, suggests that dust aerosols are an important source of inaccuracies in numerical weather-prediction models in this region. For the average dust event, dust is estimated to heat the lower atmosphere (1.5–3.5 km altitude) by 0.2 K per day. At about 30 dusty days per year, the presence of the dust leads to a regional heating rate of 6 K per year.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Right, monthly average image of the number of dusty days for five years from 1984 to 1988 for March, June, September and December, top to bottom; takenfrom ref. 12.
Figure 2: The latitudinal variation of both the maximum IAU(T) (dashed line) and the latitude of maximum dusty days (solid line).
Figure 3: The monthly heating rate in degrees Kelvin per day, as deduced from IAU(T) and the average number of dusty days.
Figure 4: Jittered scatter plot for IAU(T) versus number of dusty days for each pixel; 208 points for each month total of 2,496 points.

References

  1. Charlson, R. et al. Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science 255, 423–430 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Penner, J. E. et al. Quantifying and minimizing uncertainty of climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 75, 375–400 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tegen, I., Lacis, A. A. & Fung, I. The influence of mineral aerosols from disturbed soils on the global radiation budget. Nature 380, 419–422 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arking, A. The radiative effects of clouds and their impact on climate. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 72, 795–813 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindzen, R. S. Some coolness concerning global warming. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 71, 288–299 (1990).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moulin, C., Lambert, C. E., Dulac, F. & Dayan, U. Control of atmospheric export of dust from North Africa by the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature 387, 691–694 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prospero, J. M. et al. Temporal variability of summertime ozone and aerosols in the free troposphere over the eastern North Atlantic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 2925–2928 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Husar, R. B., Prospero, J. M. & Stowe, L. L. Characterization of tropospheric aerosols over the oceans with the NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer optical thickness operational product. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 16889–16910 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Daley, R. Atmospheric Data Analysis (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, (1991)).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bloom, S. S., Takacs, L. L., da Silva, A. M. & Ledvina, D. Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon. Weath. Rev. 124, 1256–1271 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schubert, S. et al. An assimilated data set for Earth Science applications. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 74, 2331–2342 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jankoviak, I. & Tanre, D. Satellite climatology of Saharan dust outbreaks: Method and preliminary results. J. Clim. 15, 646–656 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prospero, J. M. & Nees, R. T. Impact of the North African drought and El Niño on the mineral dust in the Barbados trade winds. Nature 320, 735–738 (1986).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Westphal, D. L., Toon, O. B. & Carlson, T. N. Atwo-dimensional numerical investigation of the dynamics and micro-physics of Saharan dust storms. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 3027–3049 (1987).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossow, R. B. & Schiffer, R. A. ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 72, 2–20 (1991).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asnani, G. C. Tropical Meteorology (Indian Inst. of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, (1993)).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pick, C. Transport of Desert Aerosols and their Influence on Local Temperature and Motion.Thesis, Tel Aviv Univ.((1991)).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Eubank, R. L. Spine Smoothing and Non-parametric Regression (Dekker, New York, (1988)).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carlson, T. N. & Benjamin, S. G. Radiative heating rates for Saharan dust. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 193–213 (1980).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karyampudi, V. M. A Numerical Study of the Evolution, Structure and Energetics of the Saharan Air Layer.Thesis (Pennsylvania State Univ., (1986)).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph, J. H. in Aerosols and their Climatic Effects (eds Gerber, H. E. & Deepak, A.) 215–226 (Deepak, Hampton, VA, (1984)).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alpert, P. & Ganor, E. Ajet-stream associated heavy dust storm in the western Mediterranean J.Geophys. Res. 98, 7339–7349 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanré, D., Kaufman, Y. J., Herman, M. & Matoo, S. Remote sensing of aerosol over oceans using the EOS-MODIS spectral radiances. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 16971–16988 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufman, Y. J. et al. Remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17051–17068 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reale, A. L., Chalfant, M. W., Wagoner, R. V., Gardner, T. J. & Casey, L. W. TOVS Operational Sounding Upgrades 1990–1992. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS 76 (US Dept of Commerce, NOAA NESDIS, Washington DC, (1994)).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation. During some of this work, P.A. held a National Research Council–NASA/GSFC research associateship. Our thanks to Y. Banjamini for statistical help with Fig. 4.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Alpert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alpert, P., Kaufman, Y., Shay-El, Y. et al. Quantification of dust-forced heating of the lower troposphere. Nature 395, 367–370 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/26456

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/26456

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing