Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparative study on analgesic effect of Met5-enkephalin and related lipotropin fragments

Abstract

HUGHES et al.1 have reported the isolation and structure of two pentapeptides from porcine brain with opiate agonist activity in isolated systems. The structure of one of these peptides, Met5-enkephalin, is identical with the sequence of pituitary β-lipotropin (β-LPH) between residues 61–65 (refs 2–4). To prove the biological correlation of brain enkephalin and pituitary β-LPH, a series of lipotropin fragments, LPH-(61–69)-5, LPH-(61–76)-6 and LPH-(61–91)-peptides7–10, have been isolated and shown to have opiate agonist activity in vitro. Only few and controversial data have been available so far on the analgesic effect in vivo of the above or similar lipotropin fragments. Enkephalins have recently been reported to induce analgesia in vivo11,12. Our preliminary data5,13, however, seemed to contradict these observations, rather suggesting that some larger fragment(s) of β-LPH may have analgesic properties. We have therefore compared the analgesic effects of Met5-enkephalin and some lipotropin fragments containing the complete structure of Met5-enkephalin at their NH2-terminus. The results show that the in vivo effect is a function of the length of the peptide chain, Met5-enkephalin being the least and LPH-(61–91)-peptide the most potent. During the preparation of this paper we have become aware of the recent observation of Bradbury and coworkers10,14 on a strong analgesic activity of LPH-(61–91)-peptide.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes, J., et al., Nature, 259, 577–579 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, C. H., Barnafi, L., Chrétien, M., and Chung, D., Nature, 208, 1093–1094 (1965).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gráf, L., Barát, E., Cseh, G., and Sajgó, M., Biochim. biophys. Acta, 229, 276–278 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cseh, G., Barát, E., Patthy, A., and Gráf, L., FEBS Lett. 21, 344–346 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gráf, L., Rónai, A. Z., Bajusz, S., Cseh, G., and Székely, J. I., FEBS Lett., 64, 181–184 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guillemin, R., Ling, N., and Burgus, R., C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, D 282, 783–785 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C. H., and Chung, D., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 1145–1148 (1976).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradbury, A. F., Smyth, D. G., and Snell, C. R., Nature, 260, 165–167 (1976).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gráf, L., Barát, E. and Patthy, A., Acta biochim. biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung., 11, 121–122 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradbury, A. F., Smyth, D. G., Snell, C. R., Birdsall, N. J. M., and Hulme, E. C., Nature 260, 793–795 (1976).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Belluzzi, J. D., et al., 260, 625–626 (1976).

  12. Büscher, H. H., et al. 261, 423–425 (1976).

  13. Rónai, A. Z., Székely, J. I., Gráf, L., Dunai-Kovács, Zs., and Bajusz, S., Life Sci. (in the press).

  14. Feldberg, W. A., and Smith, D. G., J. Physiol., Lond. (in the press).

  15. Gráf, L., and Cseh, G., Acta biochim. biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung., 3, 175–177 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gráf, L., and Li, C. H., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 53, 1304–1309 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gráf, L., Acta biochim. biophys. Acad. Sci. Hung. (in the press).

  18. Paton, W. D. M., and Vizi, E. S., Br. J. Pharmac., 35, 10–28 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D'Amour, F. E., and Smith, D. L., J. Pharm., 72, 74–79 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chermat, R., and Simon, P., J. Pharmac., Paris, 6, 489–492 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schwyzer, R., Schiller, P., Seelig, S., and Sayers, G., FEBS Lett., 19, 229–231 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bennett, H. P. J., Bullock, G., Lowry, P. J., McMartin, C., and Peters, J., Biochem J., 138, 185–194 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GRAF, L., SZEKELY, J., RONAI, A. et al. Comparative study on analgesic effect of Met5-enkephalin and related lipotropin fragments. Nature 263, 240–242 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/263240a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/263240a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing