Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

T4 gene 32 protein model for control of activity at replication fork

Abstract

Limited hydrolysis of gene 32 protein by various proteinases results in the production of three stable cleavage products. Two of these products show an affinity for native T4 DNA cellulose that the uncleaved protein does not exhibit. A model for proteolytic cleavage and for the local unwinding of DNA in advance of the replication fork is discussed in terms of this unusual binding affinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts, M.B., and Frey, L., Nature, 227, 1313–1318 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Epstein, R. H., et al., Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., 28, 375–394 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, H., Warren, A. J., and Fry, K. E., J. Virol., 3, 171–175 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tomizawa, J., Anraku, N., and Iwama, Y., J. molec. Biol., 21, 247–253 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hosoda, J., Takacs, B., and Brack, C., FEBS Lett., 47, 338–342 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Onorato, L., and Showe, M. K., J. molec. Biol., 92, 395–412 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Price, P. A., Liu, T. Y., Stein, W. H., and Moore, S., J. biol. Chem., 244, 917–923 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alberts, B. M., et al., in Proc. 1975 ICN-UCLA Symp. molec. cell. Biol. (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Menlo Park, California, in the press).

  9. Huberman, J. A., Kornberg, A., and Alberts, B. M., J. molec. Biol., 62, 39–52 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, R. B., Neet, K. E., and Goldthwait, D. A., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 2741–2744 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carroll, R. B., Neet, K. E., and Goldthwait, D. A., J. molec. Biol., 91, 275–291 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laemmli, U. K., Nature, 227, 680–685 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Studier, F. W., J. molec. Biol., 79, 237–284 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kellenberger, E., and Sechaud, J., Virology, 3, 256–274 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krisch, H. M., Bolle, A., and Epstein, R. H., J. molec. Biol., 88, 89–104 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alberts, B., and Herrick, G., in Methods in Enzymology. XXXI (edit. by Grossman and Moldave), 198–217 (Academic, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Litman, R. M., J. biol. Chem., 243, 6222–6233 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moise, H., Hosoda, J. T4 gene 32 protein model for control of activity at replication fork. Nature 259, 455–458 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/259455a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/259455a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing