Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Constraints on the Hubble constant from observations of the brightest red-giant stars in a Virgo-cluster galaxy

Abstract

The nearest large groups of elliptical galaxies, in the Virgo and Fornax clusters, play a central role in determinations of the Hubble constant, H0, and hence the cosmological rate of expansion. Because the relative distances between these two clusters and more remote clusters are well known, absolute distance determinations to Virgo and Fornax should establish the Hubble constant for the local Universe. In addition, elliptical galaxies reside predominantly in the cores of clusters, so distance calibrations for ellipticals should minimize the uncertainties due to the possibly large extent of the clusters along the line of sight. A powerful and direct way of establishing such distances is to use thebrightest red-giant stars, which have nearly uniform luminosities1,2. Here we report the direct observation of old red-giant stars in a dwarf elliptical galaxy in the Virgo cluster. We determine a distance to this galaxy, and thus to the core of the Virgo cluster, of 15.7 ± 1.5 megaparsecs, from which we estimate a Hubble constant of H0 = 77 ± 8 km s−1 Mpc−1. Under the assumption of a low-density Universe with the simplest cosmology, the age of the Universe is no more than 12–13 billion years.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Luminosity function.
Figure 2: Fiducial giant branches for standard Milky Way globular clusters (absolute magnitude MI against colour (VI)0).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee, M. G., Freedman, W. L. & Madore, B. F. The tip of the red giant branch as a distance indicator for resolved galaxies. Astrophys. J. 417, 553–559 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mould, J. & Kristian, J. The stellar populations in the halos of M31 and M33. Astrophys. J. 305, 591–599 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, M. G. The distance to nearby galaxy NGC 3109 based on the tip of the red giant branch. Astrophys. J. 408, 409–415 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakai, S., Madore, B. F. & Freedman, W. L. Tip of the red giant branch distances to galaxies. III. The dwarf galaxy sextans A. Astrophys. J. 461, 713–723 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Da Costa, G. S. & Armandroff, T. E. Standard globular cluster giant branches in the (M1I, (VI)0) plane. Astron. J. 100, 162–181 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pierce, M. J. et al. The Hubble constant and Virgo cluster distance from observations of Cepheid variables. Nature 371, 385–389 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freedman, W. L. et al. Distance to the Virgo cluster galaxy M100 from Hubble Space Telescope observations of Cepheids. Nature 371, 757–762 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrarese, L. et al. The extragalactic distance scale key project. IV. The discovery of Cepheids and a new distance to M100 using the HST. Astrophys. J. 464, 568–599 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Saha, A. et al. Cepheid calibration of the peak brightness of SNeIa. V. SN1981B in NGC 4536. Astrophys. J. 466, 55–91 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saha, A. et al. Cepheid calibration of the peak brightness of SNeIa. VI. SN1960F in NGC 4496A. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 107, 693–737 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson, H. C. & Sandage, A. The spatial distributions and intrinsic shapes of dwarf elliptical galaxies in the Virgo and Fornax custers. Astrophys. J. 346, L53–L56 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stetson, . B., Davis, L. E. & Crabtree, D. R. in CCDs in Astronomy (ed. Jacoby, G. H.) 289–304 (ASP Conf. Ser. 8, Astron. Soc. Pacific, San Francisco, (1990)).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Holtzman, J. A. et al. The photometric performance and calibration of WFPC2. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 107, 1065–1093 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitmore, B. & Heyer, I. New Results on Charge Transfer Efficiency and Constraints on Flat-Field Accuracy (Instrument Science Rep. 97-08, Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, (1997)).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Couture, J., Harris, W. E. & Allwright, J. W. B. BVI photometry of globular clusters in M87. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 73, 671–683 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Secker, J. & Harris, W. E. Amaximum-likelihood analysis of globular cluster luminosity distributions in the Virgo cluster. Astron. J. 105, 1358–1368 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Caldwell, N., Armandroff, T. E., Da Costa, G. S. & Seitzer, P. Dwarf elliptical galaxies in the M81 group: the structure and stellar populations of BK5N and F8D1. Astron. J. 115, 535–558 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacoby, G. H., Ciardullo, R. & Ford, H. C. Planetary nebulae as standard candles. V. The distance to the Virgo cluster. Astrophys. J. 356, 332–349 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tonry, J. L., Blakeslee, J. P., Ajhar, E. A. & Dressler, A. The SBF survey of galaxy distances. I. Sample selection, photometric calibration, and the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. 475, 399–413 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Feldmeier, J. J., Ciardullo, R. & Jacoby, G. H. Intracluster planetary nebulae in the Virgo cluster I. Initial results. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  21. Soria, R. et al. Detection of the tip of the red giant branch in NGC 5128. Astrophys. J. 465, 79–90 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Elson, R. A. W. Red giants in the halo of the S0 galaxy NGC 3115: a distance and a bimodal metallicity distribution. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 286, 771–776 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakai, S. et al. Detection of the tip of the red giant branch in NGC 3379 (M105) in the Leo I group using the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 478, 49–57 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Colless, M. & Dunn, A. M. Structure and dynamics of the Coma cluster. Astrophys. J. 458, 435–454 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mould, J. et al. Limits on the Hubble constant from the HST distance of M100. Astrophys. J. 449, 413–421 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. van den Bergh, S. The Hubble parameter. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 104, 861–883 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Faber, S. M. et al. Spectroscopy and photometry of elliptical galaxies: VI. Sample selection and data summary. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 69, 763–808 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hjorth, J. & Tanvir, N. R. Calibration of the fundamental plane zero point in the Leo I group and an estimate of the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. 482, 68–74 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Harris, W. E. et al. NGC 2419, M92, and the age gradient in the galactic halo. Astron. J. 114, 1030–1042 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gratton, R. G. et al. Ages of globular clusters from hipparcos parallaxes of local subdwarfs. Astrophys. J. 491, 749–771 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cassisi, S. & Salaris, M. The tip of the red giant branch as a distance indicator: theoretical calibration and the value of H0. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William E. Harris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, W., Durrell, P., Pierce, M. et al. Constraints on the Hubble constant from observations of the brightest red-giant stars in a Virgo-cluster galaxy. Nature 395, 45–47 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/25673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/25673

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing