Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Response of flying mole crickets to three parameters of synthetic songs broadcast outdoors

Nature volume 253, pages 530–532 (1975)Cite this article

Abstract

LARGE numbers of flying crickets can be attracted to outdoor loudspeakers broadcasting male calling songs1. Consequently we have been able to investigate the features of calling songs that are important for attraction. Previous investigators have used laboratory-maintained crickets in acoustical environments significantly different from outdoors2–7. Furthermore, they have studied thoroughly no more than one or two of the important signal parameters. We have studied outdoors the responses of free-flying mole crickets, Scapteriscus acletus, to synthetic calling songs systematically varied in these three parameters: carrier frequency, pulse rate and intensity., Mole crickets came in greatest numbers when we broadcast, at unnaturally high intensities, carrier frequencies and pulse rates like those of the natural song.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ulagaraj, S. M., and Walker, T. J., Science, 182, 1278 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, T. J., Ann. ent. Soc. Am., 50, 626 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loftus-Hills, J. J., Littlejohn, M. J., and Hill, K. G., Nature new Biol., 223, 184 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuvalov, V. F., and Popov, A. V., J. evol. Biochem. Physiol., 9, 152 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katsaki, Y., and Suga, N., J. exp. Biol., 37, 279 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nocke, H., J. comp. Physiol., 80, 141 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dragsten, P. R., Webb, W. W., Paton, J. A., and Capranica, R. R., Science, 185, 55 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ulagaraj, S. M., Environ. Entomol. (in the press).

  9. Ulagaraj, S. M., Ann. ent. Soc Am., (in the press).

  10. Busnel, R. G. (ed.), Acoustic q.havior of animals (Elsevier, New York, 1963).

  11. Bennet-Clark, H. C., J. exp. Bieol., 52, 619 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611

    S. M. ULAGARAJ & THOMAS J. WALKER

Authors
  1. S. M. ULAGARAJ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. THOMAS J. WALKER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ULAGARAJ, S., WALKER, T. Response of flying mole crickets to three parameters of synthetic songs broadcast outdoors. Nature 253, 530–532 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/253530a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/253530a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing