Is calcium ionophore a universal activator for unfertilised eggs?

Abstract

WE have previously exposed sea urchin eggs to micromolar amounts of the divalent transporting ionophore A23187, and observed every parameter of normal fertilisation. The cortical reaction with elevation of the fertilisation membrane, the plasma membrane conductance changes, the respiratory burst, and increases in protein and DNA synthesis were all initiated in the usual fashion1. These activations of Lytechinus pictus and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus eggs were independent of the ionic composition of the external solutions1. A23187 seemed to act by releasing intracellular Ca2+, for eggs preloaded with 45Ca showed a twentyfold increase in 45Ca-efflux when activated by ionophore or fertilisation1. Measurements of free and bound calcium and magnesium in homogenates of unfertilised eggs showed that most of the Mg2+ was already available in soluble form, whereas the Ca2+ was sequestered but available for release1. After we found that 50 µM A23187 could activate eggs of the mollusc Acmaea insessa and the protochordate Ciona intestinalis to undergo several abnormal cleavages, we wondered whether ionophore activation might be a general phenomenon. To our knowledge artificial parthenogenesis has not been obtained with Acmaea and Ciona eggs by other methods. We have now found that calcium ionophore activation is common to several species widely separated phylogenetically.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Steinhardt, R. A., and Epel, D., Proc. natn. Aacd. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 1915 (1974).

  2. 2

    Kanatani, H., Shirai, H., Nakanishi, K., and Kurokawa, T., Nature, 216, 284 (1969).

  3. 3

    Stevens, M., Expl Cell Res., 59, 482 (1970).

  4. 4

    Hirai, S., Kubota, J., and Kanatani, H., Expl Cell Res., 68, 137 (1971).

  5. 5

    Wolf, D. P., and Hedrick, J. L., Devl Biol., 25, 348 (1971).

  6. 6

    Yanagimachi, R., J. Reprod. Fert., 18, 275 (1969).

  7. 7

    Biggers, J. D., Whitten, W. K., and Whittingham, D. G., in Methods in mammalian embryology (edit. by Daniel, J. C., jun.) Table 6–5, 101 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1971).

  8. 8

    Barros, C., and Yanagimachi, R., J. exp. Zool., 180, 251 (1972).

  9. 9

    Barros, C., and Yanagimachi, R., Nature, 234, 479 (1971).

  10. 10

    Gwatkin, R. B. L., Williams, D. T., Hartmann, J. F., and Kniazuk, M., J. Reprod. Fert., 32, 259 (1973).

  11. 11

    Daleq, A., Les beses physiologiques de la fecondation at de la parthenogenese (Les Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1928).

  12. 12

    Hollingworth, J., Biol. Bull., 81, 261 (1928).

  13. 13

    Mazia, D., J. cell. comp. Physiol., 10, 291 (1937).

  14. 14

    Nigon, V., and Do, F., C. r. hebd. Acad. Sci., 257, 2178 (1963).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.