Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effect of Filtered Cigarette Smoke on Rats

Abstract

THE gas phase of cigarette smoke (Cambridge and activated charcoal filter) has been shown to have a detrimental effect on several performance tests with rats, including swimming endurance1 and avoidance response2. The gas-vapour phase (Cambridge filter alone) had a significantly less toxic effect in these tests. These results were attributed to differences in respiration, in which breathing was apparently more inhibited by the irritants3 in the gas-vapour phase, resulting in a larger intake of toxic CO4 when the gas phase was presented alone. The purpose of this study was to test this hypothesis by measuring the respiratory response to these filter conditions, and to correlate this with %COHb measured immediately after “smoking”. As an index of respiratory dynamics, the breathing rate was used because it has been shown to be the most reliable and sensitive parameter5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bättig, K., and Hrubes, V., Z. Präventivmed., 16, 205 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Driscoll, P., and Bättig, K., Z. Präventivmed., 16, 197 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haag, H. B., Larson, P. S., and Finnegan, J. K., Amer. Med. Assoc. Arch. Otolaryng., 69, 261 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dontenwill, W., in Inhalation Carcinogenesis, Oak Ridge Biol. Conf., 389 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carson, S., Goldhamer, R., Mackars, A., and Silson, J., Arch. Env. Health, 11, 635 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Richterich, R., Klinische Chemie, 292 (Karger, Basel 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Driscoll, P., and Deuber, A., Z. Präventivmed., 16, 413 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Knelson, J. H., Howatt, W. F., and DeMuth, G. R., J. Appl. Physiol., 29, 328 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffman, D., and Wynder, E. L., in Inhalation Carcinogenesis, Oak Ridge Biol. Conf., 173 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke, B., Guyatt, A., Alpers, J., Fletcher, C., and Hill, I., Thorax, 25, 418 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DRISCOLL, P., DEUBER, A., BAETTIG, K. et al. Effect of Filtered Cigarette Smoke on Rats. Nature 237, 37–38 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237037a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237037a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing