Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication

Nature volume 400, pages 77–81 (1999)Cite this article

Abstract

Eph proteins are receptors with tyrosine-kinase activity which, with their ephrin ligands, mediate contact-dependent cell interactions1 that are implicated in the repulsion mechanisms that guide migrating cells and neuronal growth cones to specific destinations2,3. Ephrin-B proteins have conserved cytoplasmic tyrosine residues that are phosphorylated upon interaction with an EphB receptor4,5, and may transduce signals that regulate a cellular response6. Because Eph receptors and ephrins have complementary expression in many tissues during embryogenesis7, bidirectional activation of Eph receptors and ephrin-B proteins could occur at interfaces of their expression domains, for example at segment boundaries in the vertebrate hindbrain. Previous work8,9 has implicated Eph receptors and ephrin-B proteins in the restriction of cell intermingling between hindbrain segments10. We therefore analysed whether complementary expression of Eph receptors and ephrins restricts cell intermingling, and whether this requires bidirectional or unidirectional signalling. Here we report that bidirectional but not unidirectional signalling restricts the intermingling of adjacent cell populations, whereas unidirectional activation is sufficient to restrict cell communication through gap junctions. These results reveal that Eph receptors and ephrins regulate two aspects of cell behaviour that can stabilize a distinct identity of adjacent cell populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Bidirectional but not unidirectional signalling restricts cell intermingling.
Figure 2: Quantification of cell intermingling.
Figure 3: Activation of Eph receptor or ephrin blocks communication through gap junctions.
Figure 4: Model of restriction of cell intermingling and communication through gap junctions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davis, S. et al. Ligands for EPH-related receptors that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. Science 266, 816–819 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flanagan, J. G. & Vanderhaeghen, P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu. Rev. Neurobiol. 21, 309–345 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O'Leary, D. D. M. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph receptors and ephrins in neural development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9, 65–73 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holland, S. J. et al. Bidirectional signalling through the Eph-family receptor Nuk and its transmembrane ligands. Nature 383, 722–725 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruckner, K., Pasquale, E. B. & Klein, R. Tyrosine phosphorylation of transmembrane ligands for Eph receptors. Science 275, 1640–1643 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henkemeyer, M. et al. Nuk controls pathfinding of commisural axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Cell 86, 35–46 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gale, N. W. et al. Eph receptors and ligands comprise two major specificity subclasses, and are reciprocally compartmentalised during embryogenesis. Neuron 17, 9–19 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, Q., Alldus, G., Holder, N. & Wilkinson, D. G. Expression of truncated Sek-1 receptor tyrosine kinase disrupts the segmental restriction of gene expression in the Xenopus and zebrafish hindbrain. Development 121, 4005–4016 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Q., Mellitzer, G., Robinson, V. & Wilkinson, D. G. In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins. Nature 399, 267–271 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fraser, S., Keynes, R. & Lumsden, A. Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions. Nature 344, 431–435 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eph Nomenclature Committee. Unified nomenclature for Eph family receptors and their ligands, theephrins. Cell 90, 403–404 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein, E. et al. Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. Genes Dev. 12, 667–678 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Torres, R. et al. PDZ domains bind, cluster, and synaptically colocalize with Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Neuron 21, 1453–1463 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H. U. & Anderson, D. J. Eph family transmembrane ligands can mediate repulsive guidance of trunk neural crest migration and motor axon outgrowth. Neuron 18, 383–396 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krull, C. E. et al. Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration. Curr. Biol. 7, 571–580 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez, S., Geijo, E., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Puelles, L. & Gallego, R. Reduced junctional permeability at interrhombomeric boundaries. Development 116, 1069–1076 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bagnall, K. M., Sanders, E. J. & Berdan, R. C. Communication compartments in the axial mesoderm of the chick embryo. Anat. Embryol. 186, 195–204 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, N. H. & Gilula, N. B. The gap junction communication channel. Cell 84, 381–388 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruzzone, R., White, T. W. & Paul, D. L. Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 1–27 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeichi, M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 251, 1451–1455 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gumbiner, B. M. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84, 345–357 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wizenmann, A. & Lumsden, A. Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 448–459 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zisch, A. H. et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of L1 family adhesion molecules: implication of the Eph kinase Cek5. J. Neurosci. Res. 47, 655–665 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruckner, K. & Klein, R. Signaling by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 375–382 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo, C. W. The role of gap junction membrane channels in development. J. Bioenerg. Biomemb. 28, 379–385 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simon, A. M. & Goodenough, D. A. Diverse functions of vertebrate gap junctions. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 477–483 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Martinez, S., Marin, F., Nieto, M. A. & Puelles, L. Induction of ectopic engrailed expression and fate change in avian rhombomeres: intersegmental boundaries as barriers. Mech. Dev. 51, 289–303 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Warner, A. E. & Lawrence, P. A. Permeability of gap junctions at the segmental border in insect epidermis. Cell 28, 243–252 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Henkemeyer, N. Gale and G. Yancopoulos for reagents, and J.-P. Vincent and R.Krumlauf for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by an EMBO Postdoctoral Fellowship to G.M., the MRC and a European Commission Biotechnology grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, NW7 1AA, UK

    Georg Mellitzer, Qiling Xu & David G. Wilkinson

Authors
  1. Georg Mellitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiling Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David G. Wilkinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Wilkinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77–81 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/21907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/21907

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing