Abstract
No agreement exists as to the effect of administration of exogenous posterior pituitary principles on neurohypophysial structures. Some authors1 describe no changes in neurosecretory phenomena, others2 think the dosage important, whereas increase in neurosecretion has been reported by me3. One of the difficulties in evaluating and comparing alterations in material stained with chrome-alum hæmatoxylin is the lack of adequate histological assaying methods. When the amount of chrome-alum hæmatoxylin-positive material has not increased considerably following hormone treatment, it is difficult to be reasonably certain of the effect. In addition, not all such material necessarily represents posterior pituitary hormone or ‘true’ neurosecretory material3,4.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Green, J. D., and Van Breemen, V. L., Amer. J. Anat., 197, 177 (1955).
Legait, H., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 149, 1016 (1955).
Groot, J. de, Anat. Rec., 127, 201 (1957).
Adams, C. W. M., and Sloper, J. C., J. Endocrinol., 13, 221 (1956).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GROOT, J. Histological and Chemical Changes in the Rat Pituitary Neural Lobe following Treatment with Neurohypophysial Substances. Nature 181, 650–651 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1038/181650c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/181650c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.