Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is Fusaric Acid a Vivotoxin?

Abstract

WHILE fusaric acid has been isolated and identified from culture filtrates of a number of Fusaria, its detection in vivo in diseased host plants has not yet been achieved in order to establish its vivotoxic complicity in wilt diseases1. Recent work of Zähner2 on the detection and estimation of fusaric acid by chromatographic and bioassay techniques suggests the possibility of detection of fusaric acid in vivo in wilting host plants. We have been employing various chromatographic techniques, particularly the circular macro-3 and micro-4 techniques developed by one of us, for the detection and quantitative estimation of fusaric acid, and experienced considerable difficulty in obtaining sharp demarcation of the bands and reproducible R F values to facilitate quantitative estimation. Fusaric acid detected with brom cresol green indicator gives a diffused and ill-defined yellow band in a blue background, possibly due to the poor ionization of the acid. The difficulty was overcome by preliminary conversion of fusaric acid into its copper complex on the filter paper with copper sulphate and irrigating the complex with excess copper with n-butanol/acetic acid/water (4: 1: 5). The quantitative estimation of fusaric acid has been carried out with this technique based on the area method and will be published shortly; we have used the technique for the detection of fusaric acid in vivo in wilted cotton plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimond, A. E., and Waggoner, P. E., Phytopathology, 43, 229 (1953). Lakshminarayanan, K., Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 41B, 132 (1955). Sadasivan, T. S., ibid., 41B, 97 (1955). Sadasivan, T. S., and Subramanian, C. V., J. Indian Bot. Soc., 33, 162 (1954). Subramanian, C. V., Curr. Sci., 24, 144 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zähner, H., Rev. App. Mycol., 34, 169 (1955); Phytopath. Z., 22, 227 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lakshminarayanan, K., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 49, 396 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lakshminarayanan, K., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 51, 367 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakshminarayanan, K., Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 40B, 167 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LAKSHMINARAYANAN, K., SUBRAMANIAN, D. Is Fusaric Acid a Vivotoxin?. Nature 176, 697–698 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1038/176697a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/176697a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing