Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

[Letters to the Editors]

Abstract

WE are glad that the critical remarks of Jánossy give us an occasion to reconsider the interpretation of our balloon experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rev. Mod. Phys. (in the press).

  2. Richards and Nordheim, Phys. Rev., 74, 1106 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhabha and Chakrabarty, Phys. Rev., 74, 1352 (1948).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millikan, Neher and Pickering, Phys. Rev., 67, 234 (1943).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROSSI, B., HULSIZER, R. [Letters to the Editors]. Nature 163, 246–247 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163246b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163246b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing