Abstract
Wool fibres show histological structure when examined microscopically, and this structural heterogeneity has recently been shown in greater detail by the electron microscope1,2,3. Apart from some analyses on scale substance by Geiger4, little chemical evidence on the composition of the different histological components is available. Recently, I have found that wool which has been deamidated by treatment with cetyl sulphonic acid5 (0.05M, 65°, 61/½ days) will partially disperse if stirred in dilute alkali (pH c. 11, room temperature, overnight), leaving a suspension of the resistant residues of the scales and cortical cells. When the clear alkaline supernatant liquor is acidified to pH 4–5, a protein-like material is precipitated which is soluble in either dilute acid or alkali. A fairly complete amino-acid analysis of these components has been carried out and is given in the accompanying table together with data for the intact wool from which they were derived. A is the resistant component of the scales and cortical cells, B is the portion precipitated from the alkaline liquor, while Aa is the resistant residue from retreatment of part of A with cetyl sulphonic acid followed by dilute alkali. These analyses show quite clearly a great difference in amino-acid composition between A and B and the intact wool. The general tendency is for amino-acids of high molecular weight to be concentrated in the soluble component, while the resistant component is particularly rich in cystine and proline. The results thus show great similarities to those of Geiger4, who probably analysed the resistant component of the scales.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mercer and Rees, Austral. J. Exp. Biol., 24, 147 (1946).
Mercer and Rees, Austral. J. Exp. Biol., 24 175 (1946).
Farrant, Mercer and Bees, Nature, 159, 535 (1947).
Geiger, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 32, 127 (1944).
Steinhardt and Fugitt, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., 29, 315 (1942).
Butler, (through) Nature, 159, 581 (1947).
Jones and Gersdorff, J. Biol. Chem., 106, 707 (1934)
Gordon, Martin and Synge, Biochem. J., 37, 92 (1943).
Consden, Gordon and Martin, Biochem. J., in the press.
Fischer and Abderhalden, Z. physiol. Chem., 39, 81 (1903).
Mercer, personal communication.
Astbury, J. Chem. Soc., 337 (1942).
Pauling, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 62, 2643 (1943).
Coleman and Howitt, Nature, 155, 78 (1945).
Middlebrook and Phillips, Biochem. J., 36, 428 (1942).
Lindley and Phillips, Biochem. J, 39, 17 (1945).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LINDLEY, H. Chemical Constitution of Keratin. Nature 160, 190–191 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/160190a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/160190a0
This article is cited by
-
Separation and Analysis of Scale-Rich Material from Wool
Nature (1959)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.