Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sources of London Honey

Abstract

IT is well known that the main nectar flow in the London area comes from the limes (Tilia spp.) and to a lesser extent from the privet (Ligustrum). In some seasons privet predominates and the resulting honey is dark in colour with a slight greenish cast and has an unpleasant flavour with a bitter aftertaste. The honeys that were the subject of my note1 could not be mistaken for privet honey. The colour of the Ailanthus honey is a pale amber with a more definite green tinge than any other honey I have seen. Mr. Farmiloe2 has evidently misunderstood my description of the flavour. It is quite distinct from that of privet honey, which does not develop the muscatel flavour. The cat-like odour referred to is that of tom-cat urine and differs from both Ribes nigra leaves and the musky smell of mice. The odour of Ailanthus flowers is strong and similar to that of fresh elder flowers (Sambucus nigra), which changes when they wilt to the tom-cat odour. The odour of Ailanthus leaves is different from that of either fresh or wilted elder flowers, but it is irrelevant to this discussion. Another point confirming Ailanthus as the source of the cat-like and muscatel flavours is that there was no marked difference of flavour between the two honeys, although in 1944 there was nearly five times as much privet pollen present as in 1943.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melville, R., Nature, 154, 640 (1944).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Farmiloe, C., Nature, 155, 80 (1945).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hyde, H. A., Museums J., 44, 145 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MELVILLE, R. Sources of London Honey. Nature 155, 206–207 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1038/155206a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/155206a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing