Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Honey-collecting in prehistoric West Africa from 3500 years ago


Honey and other bee products were likely a sought-after foodstuff for much of human history, with direct chemical evidence for beeswax identified in prehistoric ceramic vessels from Europe, the Near East and Mediterranean North Africa, from the 7th millennium BC. Historical and ethnographic literature from across Africa suggests bee products, honey and larvae, had considerable importance both as a food source and in the making of honey-based drinks. Here, to investigate this, we carry out lipid residue analysis of 458 prehistoric pottery vessels from the Nok culture, Nigeria, West Africa, an area where early farmers and foragers co-existed. We report complex lipid distributions, comprising n-alkanes, n-alkanoic acids and fatty acyl wax esters, which provide direct chemical evidence of bee product exploitation and processing, likely including honey-collecting, in over one third of lipid-yielding Nok ceramic vessels. These findings highlight the probable importance of honey collecting in an early farming context, around 3500 years ago, in West Africa.


Honey, a rare source of sweetness, was likely a much sought-after foodstuff for much of human history. Recognition that bee products, including honey and larvae, offered a high-quality source of dietary energy, fat, and protein explains the long history of bee exploitation in the hominin lineage1,2. Honey is energetically dense3,4 and easy to consume and digest and thus may have contributed to potential links between nutrition and neural expansion of the enlarging hominin brain3. Our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), forage for honey (and brood) when it is available, as do baboons and other great apes5, suggesting the importance of honey extraction in the emergence of complex tool use in hominoids6.

Today, honeybees are an integral part of socio-ecological landscapes and beekeeping plays an important global economic role with around 1.6 million tonnes of honey being produced annually7. Wild honey is also known to be widely collected by foragers globally, except in environments such as the Arctic and Subarctic where bees do not survive2. However, evidence for ancient human exploitation of the honeybee is rare, save in palaeolithic rock art depicting bees and honey, found in Spain, India, Australia and Southern Africa, spanning the period 40,000–8000 years ago. The majority of prehistoric rock art, with over 4000 sites portraying bees, honeycombs and honey-collecting, is located in Africa, at Didima Gorge in Namibia and other locations8,9,10. Furthermore, the archaeology of honey-collecting is largely invisible, in contrast to the, often excellent, survival of other organic materials such as animal bones or plant remains11.

Recently, lipid residue analysis identified evidence for the presence of beeswax in prehistoric pottery vessels from across Neolithic Europe, the Near East and Mediterranean North Africa, providing evidence for human exploitation of the honeybee from at least the seventh millennium BC12. However, little is known of its importance in other areas globally, for example, in the subsistence of hunter-gatherer groups and early farming communities in West Africa, despite considerable historical and ethnographic literature on the use of honey across Africa, both as a food source and in the making of honey-based drinks, alcoholic or otherwise2,13,14. Today, honeybee hive products, including honey, propolis and pollen, for food and medicinal purposes, support livelihoods and provide sources of income for local communities across much of Africa, through both beekeeping and wild harvest2,7,15. In the West African tropical rain forest, collecting wild honey, found in natural hollows in tree trunks and on the underside of thick branches, is a common subsistence activity15,16,17.

West Africa is a vast geographic area extending from the Atlantic Ocean in the west, and south to Cameroon, comprising a range of ecological zones encompassing expanses of coast, rainforest, woodlands and grasslands. The archaeological record in this region comprises a highly complex and diverse, but patchy, mosaic, meaning our understanding of processes such as the transition to food production are not fully understood18,19,20,21,22. The earliest known pottery in Africa originates from West Africa, at the site of Ounjougou, Mali, in the 10th millennium cal BC, likely invented for the processing of wild grasses23, with a much later adoption of domesticated animals and development of cultivation in the region. Indeed, the spread of food production in West Africa seems to have been uneven with farming and agro-pastoral communities coexisting with hunter-gatherer-fisher groups18,20,21,22,24,25,26.

One of the most well-known cultures in prehistoric West Africa is the Central Nigerian Nok culture (Fig. 1), characterised by its remarkable terracotta figurines, which constitute the earliest large-sized figurative art objects in Africa outside Egypt27 (Fig. 2) and early evidence for iron production in West Africa, ca. first millennium BC28. The Nok culture spans a period of around 1500 years, beginning around the middle of the second millennium BC29,30. Inhabitants of Nok settlements appear to be agriculturalists existing on a diet that included millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and cowpea31 (Vigna unguiculata). A complete absence of animal bones, due to acidic soils, means that it is not known whether the Nok people kept domesticated animals or depended solely on hunting wild game.

Fig. 1: Map of Nok sites.

Distribution map showing Nok archaeological sites sampled in this study, including Akura, Ankoro, Daji Gwana, Doguwa, Ido, Ifana, Janruwa A, Janruwa B, Puntun Dutse, Pangwari, Tudun Dosa and Ungwar Kura (map by Eyub F. Eyub).

Fig. 2: Nok culture terracotta statues.

Composite of Nok culture terracottas from three sites: a Ifana, b Ungwar Kura and c Pangwari (© Goethe University, Frankfurt).

Here we perform organic residue analysis on 458 potsherds from 12 Nok archaeological sites (Fig. 1) to investigate Nok diet and subsistence. Lipid biomarker analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) yield a complex suite of lipids including n-alkanes, n-alkanoic acids and fatty acyl wax esters, indicating the presence of beeswax in over one-third of Nok lipid-yielding vessels. Hence, we report direct chemical evidence of beeswax, likely related to honey processing, in West African ceramic vessels, and thus honey-collecting, in an early farming context, around 3500 years ago, and, additionally, biomolecular evidence for the palaeoecological range of Apis mellifera adansonii in Holocene West Africa.



A total of 458 potsherds from 12 sites in Central Nigeria, covering the Early, Middle and Late Nok periods (Fig. 3), were analysed using established protocols described in detail in earlier publications32,33. Vessels sampled comprised everted rim pots with body diameters of ca. 20–30 cm, the common form found within the Nok pottery assemblage. Recovery rates were low overall, with 66 sherds (14.4%) yielding interpretable lipid profiles (Table 1). Lipid concentrations ranged from 7 to 1815.6 μg g−1, with one exception, sherd NOK284, displaying a typical degraded animal fat profile, which yielded a lipid concentration of 13.2 mg g−1. Lipid biomarker analyses by GC/MS showed the Nok residues to fall into three broad categories. The first group of lipid profiles (n = 14) were dominated by the free fatty acids, palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0), typical of a degraded animal fat34,35. A further 27 lipid profiles (group 2) comprised a range of complex distributions denoting the processing of various plant types.

Fig. 3: Typical Nok potsherds.

1 Early Nok potsherds from the Doguwa site (DOG 3_8008, DOG 3_8054), belonging to the Puntun Dutse pottery group. 2 Early Middle Nok potsherd from the Ifana site (IFA 3_2714) belonging to the Ifana pottery group. 3 Later Middle to Late Nok potsherds from the Ungwar Kura site (UK 9_1738) belonging to the Ungwar Kura pottery group.

Table 1 Total number of potsherds (from each category and period) sampled for lipid analysis, shown by group, and number of potsherds containing lipids, as percentage of each group.

Beeswax lipid profiles

The remaining 25 lipid profiles (Table 2) comprised very distinctive series of even-numbered n-alkanoic acids (C20–C32), n-alkanols (C22–C34), and n-alkanes (C23–C35), indicative of the presence of beeswax. Lipid concentrations ranged from 14 to 1815.6 μg g−1 and varied significantly with 15 typical ‘beeswax’ profiles at concentrations <100 μg g−1 and 10 potsherds with concentrations >100 μg g−1 (Table 2, shown in bold). These lipid profiles suggest the presence of beeswax in the vessels36,37 and thus 19 of the sherds were selected for further analysis by solvent extraction to identify higher molecular weight compounds, wax esters (fatty acyl monoesters) and hydroxy wax esters (hydroxyl fatty acid monoesters), which would unambiguously confirm the presence of beeswax in the sherds. Concentrations in the remaining six vessels were deemed too low to produce meaningful results from further analysis.

Table 2 List of 25 Nok potsherds showing ‘typical’ beeswax lipid profiles.

Following solvent extraction32, five profiles (NOK003, NOK081, NOK119, NOK120 and NOK167) comprised series of higher molecular weight compounds denoting the presence of beeswax, with the remainder likely being at too low concentration for preservation of the higher molecular weight compounds (see Table 2 and Figs. 4 and 5). A further vessel, NOK376, also contained wax esters, albeit in low abundance. Compounds dominating in these lipid profiles included the C28, C30 and C32 n-alkanols and C24 and C26 n-alkanoic acids, and, eluting at longer retention times, were a series of C40–C52 carbon number palmitic acid wax esters, maximising at C46. A series of hydroxy palmitic acid wax esters, eluting at somewhat longer retention times than the wax esters, in which the C48 and C50 homologues were the most abundant components, are also present in samples NOK003, NOK081, NOK119, NOK120 and NOK167. These results unambiguously confirm these vessels contained beeswax residues. A further eight potsherds (NOK15, NOK93, NOK106, NOK127, NOK158, NOK246, NOK300 and NOK376, Table 2) also yielded lipid extracts containing the characteristic distributions of both n-alcohols (C22–C34) and n-alkanes (C21–C31), described above. These lipid profiles resembled those of the six sherds described above but lacked the intact wax esters and hydroxy palmitic acid wax esters present in these sherds.

Fig. 4: High-temperature gas chromatograms showing beeswax lipid distributions.

Partial high-temperature gas chromatograms of trimethylsilylated TLEs from Nok pottery extracts NOK119 and NOK167, red circles, n-alkanoic acids (fatty acids, FA); green rhombus, n-alkanes (ALK); purple star, n-alkanols (OH); black triangles, fatty acyl monoesters (WE); blue squares, hydroxyl fatty acyl monoesters (HWE) and IS internal standard, C34 n-tetratriacontane.

Fig. 5: High-temperature gas chromatography/mass spectrometry chromatograms of a total lipid extract, containing beeswax, from potsherd NOK119.

a. partial total ion current chromatogram and b-f. mass chromatograms displaying ion masses of characteristic fragments from the main compound classes comprising the extract (m/z 85, 73, 103, 257 and 117, respectively), showing one of the molecular structures of each compound class. Green rhombus, n­-alkanes (ALK); red circles, n­-alkanoic acids (fatty acids, FA); purple stars, n­-alkanols (OH); black triangles, fatty acyl monoesters (WE); blue squares, hydroxyl fatty acyl monoesters (HWE); IS, internal standard (n-­tetratriacontane). Numbers denote carbon chain length.

Modern beeswax lipid distributions

Fresh beeswax comprises a complex mixture of aliphatic compounds which consist of series of homologues differing in chain-length by two methylene groups. The n-alkanoic acids range from C20 to C36 (usually dominated by lignoceric acid, C24) and the medium-chain n-alkanes range from C23 to C31 (with C27 dominating in A. mellifera). Monoesters comprise predominantly alkyl palmitates (C38–C52), with characteristic hydroxy monoesters comprising long-chain alcohols (C24–C38) esterified mainly to hydroxypalmitic acid38, ranging between C40 and C54. Whilst the chromatographic profile of ancient beeswax is relatively resistant to degradation, it often presents differences to that of modern beeswax12,37. It is known the free n-alkanols are not seen in fresh beeswax but do occur in aged wax, resulting from hydrolysis of the wax esters. Furthermore, a preferential loss of shorter chain n-alkanes may result in changes to the n-alkane profile across time39.

African honeybee species

There are 10 species of Apis, which, aside from A. mellifera, are confined to Asia. The native distribution of the western honeybee (A. mellifera L.) encompasses Africa, Europe and western Asia40,41. In Africa, there are 10 subspecies of A. mellifera42, with A. mellifera adansonii being regarded as the ‘indigenous’ Western Africa subspecies43,44, making it the likely candidate for the Nok beeswax lipids. Its distribution area of the wet tropical and equatorial zone along the coast of West Africa overlaps with that of A. mellifera jemenitica subspecies to the north, who occupy the Sahel and the drier savannas of the North Sudan vegetation zone and some hybridisation between the two subspecies is thought to occur42. Significantly, it has been shown that there are no notable differences in the basic chemical composition of wax originating from different A. mellifera subspecies, only small variations related to the proportion of the predominant compounds45,46,47, i.e. fatty acid esters (67%), hydrocarbons (14%), and free fatty acids (13%). Stingless bees (Meliponines) are also exploited in Africa, although their honey yield is known to be much lower2.

Beeswax lipid-yielding vessels

Vessel NOK119 (Figs. 4 and 5), dating to the Early Nok period, displaying a typical beeswax profile including wax esters and hydroxyl wax esters, also contained the major fatty acids, C16:0 and C18:0, typical of animal product processing, in relatively high abundance. Furthermore, the lipid concentration of this vessel was the highest of all possible beeswax residue-bearing vessels at 1.8 mg g−1, suggesting that beeswax or, possibly, honey may have been mixed with animal products in this vessel, similarly to the mixing of fats and waxes in two Late Saxon/early medieval ceramic vessels48 recovered from West Cotton, Northamptonshire, UK. A further two vessels (NOK167, Early Nok and NOK376, Middle Nok) also displayed relatively high concentrations at 0.9 and 0.6 mg g−1, respectively. Of these two vessels, NOK167, with a lipid profile including wax esters (C40–C48) and hydroxy wax esters (C46–C48), also contained high abundances of the C16 fatty acid and lower abundances of the C18 again suggesting these vessels may have been used in the processing of bee and animal carcass products. Following solvent extraction, vessel NOK376 did not include C16:0 and C18:0 fatty acids, typical of animal product processing, and yielded very low abundances of wax esters and was thus likely to have been used solely for bee product processing.

The 25 potsherds containing compounds suggestive of the presence of beeswax come from three periods: Early Nok, Early Middle and Later Middle Nok, perhaps not surprisingly, as these categories comprised the largest numbers of sherds sampled and lipid-containing sherds.

These data demonstrate that beeswax, a direct indicator of bee exploitation, occurs throughout the Nok culture. Interestingly, no biomarkers for beeswax were found in (later) Common Era sherds. Indeed, only 8% (n = 5, Table 1) of these sherds yielded lipids suggesting either that, overall, Common Era pottery was not used as much or lipid preservation conditions were less favourable. Overall, beeswax occurred in 38% of lipid-yielding sherds across all periods but was the most frequent commodity processed in Early Nok pottery (55%, n = 11, Table 2), decreasing somewhat in Early and Later Middle Nok pottery (38% and 38%, n = 9 and n = 5, respectively, Table 2).


Where available, honeybee hive products, including honey, beeswax and brood (pupae and larvae) would likely have been of considerable importance to ancient communities, both as a nutritional source and also for medicinal, cosmetic and technological purposes. Honey is the most important insect-related food globally2 and, as a rare source of sweetener, comprises 80–95% sugar (carbohydrate), several essential vitamins and minerals and components that act as preservatives4,49,50,51. In addition, bee brood are a good source of protein, fat, several essential minerals, and B-vitamins52,53 and are today used as a food source in many places, including some African countries, China, Mexico and Thailand54,55,56,57,58. Bee products, including honey, propolis, royal jelly and venom, possess various bioactive properties and have a history of use for various medicinal purposes, both in West Africa and globally. For example, propolis has both antiseptic and anaesthetic properties and is often used as an ingredient in medicines, toothpastes, oral sprays and chewing gums and royal jelly is valued as a medicine, tonic or aphrodisiac, likely because it contains many insect growth hormones15.

Beeswax itself has been used for technological purposes since the Palaeolithic, with the earliest known use being as an adhesive at Border Cave, South Africa, ca. 40,000 years ago, where a lump of carefully curated organic material, comprising a mixture of beeswax and Euphorbia tirucalli resin wrapped in vegetal fibres, was likely used to haft a bone point59. Beeswax has also variously been used from prehistoric times as a sealant or waterproofing agent on Early Neolithic collared flasks in northern Europe60, as a lamp illuminant in Minoan Crete39 and mixed with tallow, possibly for making candles, in medieval vessels at West Cotton, Northamptonshire48.

The presence of beeswax in ancient pottery, identified through the complex lipid distributions discussed previously, most likely arises as a consequence either of the processing (melting) of wax combs through gentle heating, leading to its absorption within the vessel walls, or, alternatively, beeswax is assumed to act as a proxy for the processing (cooking) or storage of honey itself12. The presence of high lipid concentrations in some Nok vessels suggests they may have been used in cooking or heating honey, possibly as an additive to other dishes, or storing it for consumption. Where honey is available, it is often an important food source for hunter-gatherers2 and there are several groups in Africa, such as the Efe foragers of the Ituri Forest, Eastern Zaire, who have historically relied on honey as their main source of food, collecting all parts of the hive, including honey, pollen and bee larvae, from tree hollows which can be up to 30 m from the ground, using smoke to distract the stinging bees17. The Hadza people, a forager group living in northern Tanzania, also rank honey as their favourite food2,61 which they mainly collect whilst climbing Baobab trees2. Honey also makes other products more storable. Among the Okiek people of Kenya, who rely on the trapping and hunting of a wide variety of game, smoked meat is preserved with honey, being kept for up to 3 years13, hence, Nok vessels which contained a mixture of animal fats and beeswax in high abundances, could have been used as containers to preserve meat in honey. The Okiek people, who sometimes use leather bags to ferment honey, keep separate pots for cooking and honey use, which are generally the same size but of a different form, with the honey pots having a narrower and longer neck than the cooking pots62.

The importance of bee larvae and pupae to modern foragers is also well-attested4,16,17, suggesting a further possible use of Nok vessels was to heat the combs containing brood. Once the beeswax was melted, it could be drained off leaving the larvae and pupae, which, as mentioned, are excellent sources of protein and fat. Today, Hadza foragers do not remove the bee larvae from the combs as they are eaten, and this provides an important fat source during parts of the year4, particularly in the rainy season when hunting is less productive, the time when bee products are at their most available2.

Honey and other bee products are also an important resource for modern West African farming populations who provide hives for feral bees to colonise63,64. The first farmers appear in central Nigeria (likely from the North) at around 1500 BC and may have gained their knowledge of bee behaviours through cultural contacts with indigenous hunter-gatherers, similarly to the adoption of local Canarium schweinfurthii fruits, a valuable source of fat31. Together with small-scale farming, Nok groups are known to have exploited wild resources31.

Given the importance of honey in making honey-based drinks, wine, beer and non-alcoholic beverages, in Africa today, the Nok vessels may have been used for this purpose, although it should be noted that honey has not been identified and the chemical identification of ancient fermentation is notoriously difficult65. Honey may have been one of the first foodstuffs used by ancient humans to produce alcoholic beverages10,66 although the antiquity of human alcohol production and consumption is not known. Nonetheless, there are a vast range of indigenous alcoholic beverages produced across Africa, by at least 50 different groups, including those made from honey14,66. Ethnographic and historical accounts of the production of honey-based drinks in Africa confirm that honey would normally be diluted in water to produce drinks, as described by Ibn Battuta, visiting the town of Walata, Mauritania, in 1352, who describes a sour drink made from ground millet mixed with honey and sour milk, with water added, served at a reception for merchants from the Maghreb67. The production and consumption of honey-based alcoholic drinks by prehistoric groups in Africa would likely have been valuable in creating and maintaining social, economic and political relations, possibly through the performance of ritual and ceremonial practices68.

A further possibility is that the pots themselves may have been used as beehives (Fig. 6a–c), implying some management of the bees. This is commonplace today in East and South Africa and also evidenced in modern-day Nigerian traditional beekeeping or bee maintaining15. Here, pottery hives are either placed on the ground or in trees, while other types of hives made from clay, mud, straw or bark are always placed in trees63 (Fig. 6d). Little, or no, management of the hives takes place, in contrast to modern European beekeeping, mainly because of the tendency to abscond in tropical African honeybees. Once the colony has been in place for several months, harvesting of the combs takes place, sometimes destroying the nest. This usually takes place early in the rainy season, once the bees have exploited the freshly blossoming trees and before the heavy rains restrict the colony from collecting nectar and pollen4266.

Fig. 6: Examples of modern-day African beehives.

ac Images of ceramic pots from Uganda, set in trees, being used as hives (images courtesy of Bees for Development) and d image of straw hive in a tree in Nigeria.

Clay hives have been recorded in Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Malawi and Ethiopia63,66,69 and clay vessels with holes in them were used as beehives in Mozambique until the 1970s and are still used in Kenya and Uganda today69,70. However, Nok vessels are generally only 20–30 cm diameter, and likely too small to have been used for these purposes.

Finally, although honey can be squeezed from the bee combs by hand or sieved through a mesh, the invention of pottery represents a further stage of food processing for human groups, in this instance, allowing controlled heating of the comb to separate the wax, honey and/or larvae. Given the early use of pottery in prehistoric West Africa, this first identification of beeswax residues, whether through honey collecting or beekeeping, in an early farming context 3500 years ago, hints at a much older history of bee exploitation. Further lipid residue analysis could confirm whether forager/honey-hunting groups exploited honeybees for their bee products some 8000 years earlier, when pottery was first invented in Africa.


Lipid extraction

Lipid analysis and interpretations were performed as detailed in previous publications32,33. The reagents used were analytical grade (typically > 98% of purity) and solvents were of HPLC grade (Rathburn). In brief, for each sample, around 2 g of cleaned potsherd was crushed and transferred into furnaced culture tubes. A known amount of internal standard was added (20 µg n-tetratriacontane; Sigma Aldrich Company Ltd.) and the lipids were then esterified/transesterified using 5 mL of H2SO4/MeOH 2–4%, by heating for 1 h at 70 °C, mixing every 10 min. Following this, the extract was centrifuged at 660 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was then removed to a clean culture tube and 2 mL of DCM extracted double-distilled water was added. In order to recover any lipids not fully solubilised by the methanol solution, 2 × 3 mL of n-hexane was added to the extracted potsherds contained in the original culture tubes, mixed well and transferred to a second culture tube. A further 2 × 2 mL n-hexane was then added directly to the H2SO4/MeOH solution and whirlimixed to extract any remaining lipids, and then combined in 3.5 mL vials and blown down until a full vial of the TLE remained. An aliquot of each TLE was derivatised using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) containing 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS; Sigma Aldrich Company Ltd., 20 μL; 70 °C, 1 h), excess BSTFA was removed under a gentle stream of nitrogen in a heating block at 40 °C and the derivatised TLE was dissolved in n-hexane prior to analysis by GC and GC–MS.

Further analysis was carried out using solvent extraction of cleaned and crushed potsherds. An internal standard was added to the sherd powder (n-tetratriacontane, typically 20 µg), to enable lipid quantification, and they were solvent extracted by ultrasonication (chloroform/methanol 2:1v/v, 30 min, 2 ×10 mL). After centrifugation, the solvent was decanted into 3.5 mL vials and blown down to dryness using a gentle stream of nitrogen, leaving the TLE. Aliquots of the TLE were filtered through a silica column and trimethylsilylated using N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, 20 µL, 70 °C, 1 h, followed by dilution with n-hexane and analysis by high-temperature-GC (HTGC) and HTGC-MS.

Instrumental analysis

Analyses of the TLEs was carried out on an Agilent 7820A gas chromatograph, using on-column injection with the flame ionisation detector (FID) set to 300 °C, and fitted with a high-temperature non-polar column (DB1-HT; 100% dimethylpolysiloxane, 15 m × 0·32 mm i.d., 0.1 μm film thickness). The carrier gas was helium, set to a constant flow of 2 mL min−1 and the temperature programme comprised a 50 °C isothermal hold followed by a gradient increase to 350 °C at a rate of 10 °C min−1 followed by a 10 min isothermal hold. Blanks (no sample) were prepared and analysed alongside every batch. Data was acquired using HP Chemstation software (Rev. C.01.07 (27), Agilent Technologies). Further compound identification was accomplished using high-temperature gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HTGC–MS). FAMEs were introduced by autosampler onto a ThermoScientific Trace 1300 gas chromatograph directly coupled to an ISQ single quadrupole mass spectrometer, fitted with a non-polar column, 15 m × 0.32 mm fused silica capillary column coated with a stationary phase (100% dimethylpolysiloxane, Restek, 0.17 μm). The initial injection port temperature was 50 °C with an evaporation phase of 0.05 min, followed by a transfer phase from 50 °C to 380 °C at 0.2 °C min−1. The oven temperature was held isothermally for 2 min at 50 °C, increasing by 10 °C min−1 to 280 °C, then at a rate of 25°C min−1 to 380 °C with a final hold at 380 °C for 5 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas and maintained at a constant flow 5 mL min−1. Operating conditions were as follows: electron ionisation (EI) mode (70 eV) with a GC interface temperature of 380 °C, source temperature 340 °C and emission current of 50 μA. The instrument was set to acquire in the range of m/z 50–950 Da at two scans s−1 in full scan mode.

Data acquisition and processing was carried out using Xcalibur software (version 3.0). Peaks were identified on the basis of their mass spectra and GC retention times, by comparison with the NIST mass spectral library (version 2.0) and modern beeswax (from the Loire department, France).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper.


  1. 1.

    Crittenden, A. N. The importance of honey consumption in human evolution. Food Foodways 19, 257–273 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marlowe, F. W. et al. Honey, Hadza, hunter-gatherers, and human evolution. J. Hum. Evol. 71, 119–128 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Skinner, M. Bee brood consumption: an alternative explanation for hypervitaminosis A in KNM-ER 1808 (Homo erectus) from Koobi Fora, Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 20, 493–503 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Murray, S. S., Schoeninger, M. J., Bunn, H. T., Pickering, T. R. & Marlett, J. A. Nutritional composition of some wild plant foods and honey used by Hadza Foragers of Tanzania. J. Food Compos. Anal. 14, 3–13 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McLennan, M. R. Is honey a fallback food for wild chimpanzees or just a sweet treat? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 158, 685–695 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boesch, C., Head, J. & Robbins, M. M. Complex tool sets for honey extraction among chimpanzees in Loango National Park, Gabon. J. Hum. Evol. 56, 560–569 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Coppinger, C. R., Ellender, B. R., Stanley, D. A. & Osborne, J. Insights into the impacts of rural honey hunting in Zambia. Afr. J. Ecol. 0, 1–5 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pager, H. Rock paintings in Southern Africa showing bees and honey hunting. Bee World 54, 61–68 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Woodhouse, H. C. Bees and honey in the prehistoric rock art of southern Africa. South Afr. Bee J. 59, 36–41 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Crane, E. The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting (Routledge, 1999).

  11. 11.

    Russell, T. & Lander, F. ‘The bees are our sheep’: the role of honey and fat in the transition to livestock keeping during the last two thousand years in southernmost Africa. Azania 50, 318–342 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Roffet-Salque, M. et al. Widespread exploitation of the honeybee by early Neolithic fermers. Nature 527, 226–230 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Micheli, I. Honey and beekeeping among the Okiek of Mariashoni, Mau forest escarpment, Nakuru District, Kenya. Ethnorêma 9, 55–102 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Platt, B. S. Some Traditional alcoholic beverages and their importance in indigenous African communities. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 14, 115–124 (1955).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    FAO. Non‐Wood Forest Products, Bees and their Role in Forest Livelihoods (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2009).

  16. 16.

    Ichikawa, M. Ecological and sociological importance of honey to the Mbuti Net Hunters, Easter Zaire. Afr. Study Monogr. 1, 55–68 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Terashima, H. Honey and holidays: The interactions mediated by honey between Efe hunter-gatherers and Lese farmers in the Ituri forest. Afr. Study Monogr. Suppl. Issue 25, 123–134 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Marshall, F. & Hildebrand, E. Cattle before crops: the beginnings of food production in Africa. J. World Prehist. 16, 99–143 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McIntosh, S. The Holocene prehistory of West Africa 10,000–1000 BP. In Themes in West Africa’s History (ed. Akyeampong, E.) 11–32 (Ohio University Press, 2006).

  20. 20.

    Kahlheber, S. & Neumann, K. The development of plant cultivation in semi-arid West Africa. In Rethinking Agriculture: Archaeological and Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives (eds Denham, T. P., Iriarte, J. & Vrydaghs, L.) 320–346 (Left Coast Press, 2007).

  21. 21.

    Ozainne, S. et al. A question of timing: spatio-temporal structure and mechanisms of early agriculture expansion in West Africa. J. Archaeol. Sci. 50, 359–368 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Neumann, K. Development of plant food production in the West African savannas: archaeobotanical perspectives. Oxford Res. Encycl. Afr. Hist. (2018).

  23. 23.

    Huysecom, E. et al. The emergence of pottery in Africa during the tenth millennium cal BC: new evidence from Ounjougou (Mali). Antiquity 83, 905–917 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Neumann, K. The romance of farming: plant cultivation and domestication in Africa. In African Archaeology (ed. Brower Stahl, A.) 249–275 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005).

  25. 25.

    Breunig, P. Pathways to food production in the Sahel. In The Oxford Handbook of African Archaeology (eds Mitchell, P. & P. Lane, P.) 555–570 (Oxford University Press, 2013).

  26. 26.

    Kay, A. U. et al. Diversification, intensification and specialization: changing land use in Western Africa from 1800 BC to AD 1500. J. World Prehist. 32, 179–228 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Willett, F. African Art (Thames and Hudson, 2002).

  28. 28.

    Breunig, P. & Rupp, N. An outline of recent studies on the Nigerian Nok Culture. J. Afr. Archaeol. 14, 237–255 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Franke, G. Potsherds in Time—the Pottery of the Nigerian Nok Culture and its Chronology (Verlag Dr. Hut, published online 12/2016).

  30. 30.

    Franke, F. et al. Pits, pots and plants at Pangwari—deciphering the nature of a Nok Culture site. Azania 55, 129–188 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Neumann. K. & Höhn, A. Millet and more: farming and food in the time of the Nok Culture. In Nok African Sculpture in Archaeological Context (ed. Breunig, P.) 178–185 (Africa Magna Verlag, 2014).

  32. 32.

    Dudd, S. N. & Evershed, R. P. Direct demonstration of milk as an element of archaeological economies. Science 282, 1478–1481 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Correa-Ascencio, M. & Evershed, R. P. High throughput screening of organic residues in archaeological potsherds using direct acidified methanol extraction. Anal. Methods 6, 1330–1340 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Evershed, R. P. et al. New criteria for the identification of animal fats preserved in archaeological pottery. Naturwissenschaften 84, 402–406 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Evershed, R. P. et al. Chemistry of archaeological animal fats. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 660–668 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Heron, C., Nemcek, N., Bonfield, K. M., Dixon, D. & Ottaway, B. S. The chemistry of Neolithic beeswax. Naturwissenschaften 81, 266–269 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Regert, M., Colinart, S., Degrand, L. & Decavallas, O. Chemical alteration and use of beeswax through time: accelerated ageing tests and analysis of archaeological samples from various environmental contexts. Archaeometry 43, 549–569 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aichholz, R. & Lorbeer, E. Investigation of combwax of honeybees with high-temperature gas chromatography and high-temperature gas chromatography–chemical ionization mass spectrometry: I. High-temperature gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 855, 601–615 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Evershed, R. P., Vaughan, S. J., Dudd, S. N. & Soles, J. S. Fuel for thought? Beeswax in lamps and conical cups from late Minoan Crete. Antiquity 71, 979–985 (1997b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Arias, M. C. & Sheppard, W. S. Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera:Apinae: Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 25–35 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Han, F., Wallberg, A. & Webster, M. T. From where did the Western honeybee (Apis mellifera) originate? Ecol. Evol. 2, 1949–1957 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hepburn, H. R. & Radloff, S. E. Honeybees of Africa (Springer, 1998).

  43. 43.

    Fletcher, D. J. C. The African bee, Apis mellifera adansonii, in Africa. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 23, 151–171 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ruttner, F. Honeybees of Tropical Africa. In Biogeography and Taxonomy of Honeybees (ed. Ruttner, F.) 199–227 (Springer, 1988).

  45. 45.

    Tulloch, A. P. Beeswax—composition and analysis. Bee World 61, 47–62 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Beverly, M. B., Kay, P. T. & Voorhees, K. J. Principal component analysis of the pyrolysis-mass spectra from African, Africanized hybrid, and European beeswax. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 34, 251–263 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Frohlich, B., Riederer, M. & Tautz, J. Comb–wax discrimination by honeybees tested with the proboscis extension reflex. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1581–1587 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Charters, S., Evershed, R. P., Blinkhorn, P. & Denham, V. Evidence for the mixing of fat and wax in archaeological ceramics. Archaeometry 37/1, 13–128 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    White, J. W. J., Riethof, M. L., Subers, M. H. & Kushnire, I. Composition of American Honeys (US Department of Agriculture, 1962).

  50. 50.

    Iskander, F. Trace and minor elements in four commercial honey brands. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 201, 401–408 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bogdanov, S., Jurendic, T., Sieber, R. & Gallmann, P. Honey for nutrition and health: a review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 27, 677–689 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hocking, B. & Matsumura, F. Bee brood as food. Bee World 41, 113–120 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Finke, M. D. Nutrient composition of bee brood and its potential as human food. Ecol. Food Nutr. 44, 257–270 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gessain, M. & Kinzler, T. Miel et Insectes à Miel chez les Bassari et dáutres Populations du Sénégal Oriental. In L’homme et l’animal (ed. Pujol, R.) (Premier Colloque d’Éthnozoologie, 1975).

  55. 55.

    Mbata, K. J. Traditional use of arthropods in Zambia. Food Insects Newsl. 8, 5–7 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ramos-Elorduy, J. et al. Nutritional value of edible insects from the state of Oaxaca, Mexico. J. Food Compos. Anal. 10, 142–157 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yhoung‐Aree, J., Puwastien, P. & Attig, G. A. Edible insects in Thailand: an unconventional protein source? Ecol. Food Nutr. 36, 133–149 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhi‐Yi, L. Insects as food in China. Ecol. Food Nutr. 36, 201–207 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    d’Errico, F. et al. Early evidence of San material culture represented by organic artifacts from Border Cave, South Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13214–13219 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Salque, M. et al. Earliest evidence for cheese making in the sixth millennium BC in northern Europe. Nature 493, 522–525 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Marlowe, F. W. & Berbesque, J. C. Tubers as fallback foods and their impact on Hadza hunter-gatherers. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 140, 751–758 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Blackburn, R. H. Okiek Ceramics: evidence for Central Kenya prehistory. Azania 8, 55–70 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mutsaers, M. Honeybee husbandry in Nigeria: traditional and modern practices. Niger. Field 58, 2–18 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hussein, M. H. Beekeeping in Africa: I. North, east, north-east and west African countries. Apiacta. 1, 32–48 (2000).

  65. 65.

    Drieu, L. et al. Is it possible to identify ancient wine production using biomolecular approaches? STAR. 6, 16–29 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Seyffert, C. Biene und Honig im Volksleben der Afrikaner, mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bienenzucht, ihrer Entstehung und Verbreitung (Voigtländer Verlag, 1930).

  67. 67.

    Lewicki, T. West African Food in the Middle Ages (Cambridge University Press, 1974)

  68. 68.

    Dietler, M. Alcohol: anthropological/archaeological perspectives. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35, 229–249 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Irvine, F. R. Indigenous African methods of beekeeping. Bee World 38, 113–128 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lewis-Williams, J. D. & Pearce, D. G. (2004). San Spirituality: Roots, Expressions and Social Consequences (Altamira Press. 2004).

Download references


The authors wish to thank NERC 771 (Reference: CC010) and NEIF ( for funding and maintenance of the instruments used for this work and Ian Bull, Alison Kuhl and Helen Whelton for technical help. We especially thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for the financial funding of this project (BR 1459/7 and NE 408/5) and the National Commission for Museums and Monuments in Nigeria for aiding us in conducting research on the Nok Culture and providing staff to assist in the fieldwork.


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information




J.D., K.N. and R.P.E. conceived the project. J.D., T.G. and C.W.-D. performed the experimental work and GC–MS analyses. G.F. assessed pottery characteristics and provided photographs. G.F. and J.D. selected the samples. K.N., P.B., G.F. and A.H. provided insights into excavation contexts and archaeobotanical insight. J.D., A.H. and G.F. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Julie Dunne or Katharina Neumann or Richard P. Evershed.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Jonathan Oluyori Aleru, Stanley Ambrose, Carl Heron and Martine Regert for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunne, J., Höhn, A., Franke, G. et al. Honey-collecting in prehistoric West Africa from 3500 years ago. Nat Commun 12, 2227 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing