Abstract
SIR LEONARD HILL writes, in NATURE of January 27, with reference to radium treatment and expresses a belief that "we would be little the worse off if all the radium now buried in deep holes for security from bombing remained there. . ." This pessimism contrasts notably with the enlightened optimism of the article, in the same issue, written by Dr. John H. Lawrence, of the University of California, who is working with great opportunities at present lacking in Great Britain. Lawrence and his co-workers are pursuing "the possibilities of artificial radioactivity and neutron rays in cancer therapy until a more satisfactory answer to this problem has been reached". What we require in Great Britain is a well-organized radiological institute where the various possibilities of radiation can be developed and extended. It had always been my hope and ambition that such an institute would be founded as a memorial to Lord Rutherford, who was always wide awake as to the possibilities of radiotherapy and the proper means by which they could be furthered or achieved.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
EVE, A. Radium Treatment. Nature 145, 347–348 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/145347b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/145347b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.