Main

Neuroleptics are a class of antipsychotics having in common the property of blocking the dopamine (DA) receptors of the D2 family. Among neuroleptics, clozapine has some peculiar properties as compared with typical neuroleptics; namely, a reduced tendency to elicit extrapyramidal side effects and a therapeutic efficacy on negative symptoms of schizophrenia and schizophrenic patients resistant to typical neuroleptics (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998; Brunello et al. 1995). These properties of clozapine have been attributed to a distinct but relatively low affinity for D2 receptors (Coward 1992; Leysen et al. 1993) and to a high affinity for 5-HT2 (Meltzer et al. 1989) and other non-DA receptors (e.g., α1) (Cohen and Lipinski 1986) as compared with typical neuroleptics. More recently clozapine has been shown to have higher affinities for D4 as compared with D2 receptors (Van Tol et al. 1991). On the basis of the above observations and in the attempt to mimic the therapeutic profile of clozapine, a number of neuroleptics that share the D2/D4 as well as the 5-HT2A and α1 blocking properties of clozapine have been developed (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998). A property common to classic and novel neuroleptics including clozapine is that of stimulating in vivo DA release in terminal DA areas (Imperato and Di Chiara 1985; Imperato and Angelucci 1989; Meltzer et al. 1989; Moghaddam and Bunney 1990). This property is commonly explained as a negative feedback secondary to blockade of DA receptors in terminal DA areas. In the case of clozapine and atypical neuroleptics, non-DA receptor mediated mechanisms (5-HT2, α1 etc.) might contribute to the stimulation of DA release in specific brain areas (e.g., prefrontal cortex) (Nomikos et al. 1994; Moghaddam and Bunney 1990; Andersson et al. 1995).

Recently, a number of areas traditionally included in the limbic system, such as the central amygdala, bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST), sublenticular substantia innominata, and other minor areas intercalated among the above ones, have been reassembled into an extensive and complex system termed “the extended amygdala” (Heimer et al. 1993). This system is thought to be interconnected with the striatum by way of the nucleus accumbens shell that is, accordingly, viewed as a transition area between the striato-pallidal system and the extended amygdala (Heimer et al. 1993). It is notable in this respect that, on the basis of studies on the effect of typical and atypical neuroleptics on the expression of the early gene c-fos, the nucleus accumbens shell has been indicated as a common substrate of the therapeutic action of neuroleptics on the positive symptoms of schizophrenia (Robertson and Fibiger 1992; Deutch and Duman 1996). Most of the areas which constitute the extended amygdala receive dense DA projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Heimer et al. 1993; Tohyama and Taketsuji 1998). Based on these premises, we investigated the effect of neuroleptics both typical and atypical on the release of DA in a major area of the extended amygdala, such as the BNST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River, Calco, Italy) weighing 230 to 250 g were housed under standard conditions of temperature and humidity under an artificial light (light from 8 A.M. to 8 P.M.).

Probe Preparation

Concentric dialysis probes were prepared with a 7-mm piece of AN 69 (sodium methallyl sulfate copolymer) dialysis fiber (310 μm o.d. 220 μm i.d. Hospal, Dasco, Italy), sealed at one end with a drop of epoxy; the sealed end was then sharpened with an abrasive disk. One of two 5-cm long pieces of fused silica (Composite Metal Services, UK) was sharpened to have the opening on a side and then was introduced in a 20-mm piece of stainless steel (obtained from a 24-gauge syringe needle) having the sharpened end coming out from the sharpened end of the needle for 9 mm. The second 5-cm long piece of silica was introduced from a side hole (made at 5 mm from the sharpened end of the needle) until it came out 7 mm from the sharpened end of the needle. The two silica tubings were sealed to the needle with epoxy and were introduced in the dialysis fiber, taking care to have the inlet reaching the lower end of the dialyzing portion (2.0 mm) of the fiber. The dialysis fiber was covered with thin layer of epoxy glue, except for the dialyzing portion, and, at the same time, the open end was sealed to the silica tubing. The outlet coming out from the side hole of the 20-mm stainless steel tubing was introduced in a 1.7-mm stainless steel tubing. The two stainless steel tubings were introduced in a piece of 200-μl micropipette tip 7-mm long and glued to it. Following its assembly, the probe was dried for 24 h.

Surgery and Experiments

Rats were anesthetized with ketamine (Ketalar®, Park-Davis, Milan, Italy) and placed in a stereotaxic apparatus. The skull was exposed, and a small hole was drilled on one side. The probe was implanted vertically in the BNST (anterior: − 0.5; lateral: 1.1; vertical: 8.1, from bregma), according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1982), and then fixed on the skull with dental cement. Rats were housed in a transparent plastic (Plexiglas) hemisphere, closed with a top hemisphere, with food and water available.

Experiments were performed on freely moving rats 24 h after probe implant. Ringer's solution (147 mM, NaCl; 2.2 mM CaCl2; 4 mM KCl) was pumped through the dialysis probe at constant rate of 1 μl/min. Samples were taken every 20 min and analyzed.

Figure 1 shows the position of the dialyzing part of the fiber in a schematic representation of a frontal (top) and horizontal (bottom) section of the rat brain at the level of BNST (A = − 0.3 mm, and V = 6.6 from bregma, respectively) redrawn from Paxinos and Watson (1982). All animal experimentation was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for care and use of experimental animals of the European Economic Community (86/809; DL 27.01.92 No. 116).

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of a frontal section (top) and horizontal section (bottom) of rat brain at A − 0.3 mm and V 6.6 from bregma, respectively, according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1982). In the frontal section, the position of the dialyzing part of the fiber is illustrated approximately as observed in one frontal section at the level of the central part of the BNST. Abbreviations: ac, anterior commissure; Acb, accumbens nucleus; BSTL, bed nucleus stria terminalis lateralis; BSTM bed nucleus stria terminalis medialis; Cpu, caudate putamen; DpMe, deep mesencefalic nucleus; FrPaM, frontoparietal cortex, motor area; FrPaSS, frontoparietal area, somatosensory area; GP globus pallidus; HDB nucleus horizontal limb diagonal band; LPO, lateral preoptic area; VP, ventral pallidum; VPL ventroposterior thalamic nucleus lateralis; VPM ventroposterior thalamic nucleus medialis.

Analytical Procedure

Dialysate samples (20 μl), were injected without any purification into a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) apparatus equipped with reverse-phase column (LC -18 DB, Supelco) and a coulometric detector (ESA Coulochem II, Bedford, MA) to quantitate DA. The first electrode was set at + 130 mV and the second electrode at − 125 mV). The composition of the mobile phase was: 50 mM Na H2 PO4/ 5 mM Na2HPO4, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, 0.5 mM octyl sodium sulfate, 15% (vol./vol.) methanol, pH 5.5. The mobil phase was pumped with an LKB 2150 pump at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The sensitivity of the assay allowed the detection of 5 f moles of DA.

Histology

At the end of the experiment, rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (0.32 g/kg IP) and then transcardially perfused with 100 ml of saline (0.9% NaCl) and 100 ml of formaldehyde (10%). The probes were removed, and brains were cut on a vibratome in serial coronal slices oriented according the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1982) to locate the position of fiber.

Drugs

BIMG 80, risperidone, clozapine, amperozide, and olanzapine were kindly provided by Dr. Franco Borsini, Boheringer Italy); L-745,870 HCl was a gift from Merck, Sharp, and Dohme, UK; other drugs were obtained from commercial sources: haloperidol (Serenase®, from Lusofarmaco Italy), prazosin HCl, ritanserin, and raclopride tartrate from RBI-Sigma, Italy. The doses used are expressed as free base.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was carried out by Statistica (Statsoft, USA). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures was applied to the data obtained from the serial assays of DA after each treatment. Results from treatments showing significant over-all changes were subjected to post hoc Tukey test with significance for p < .05. Basal values were the means of three consecutive samples differing less than 10%.

RESULTS

Basal values of DA in the BNST were 14.3 ± 1.3 f moles/20 μl sample (mean ± SE). As shown in Figure 1, the probes were located in the lateral part of the BNST.

A significant increase of dialysate DA was elicited by various atypical and novel neuroleptics, such as clozapine (Figure 2) at doses of 5.0 (max + 158%), 10 (max + 298%), and 20 mg/kg IP (max + 461%); risperidone (Leysen et al. 1994) (Figure 3) at doses of 1.0 (max + 115%) and 3.0 mg/kg IP (max + 221%); olanzapine (Beasley et al. 1996) (Figure 4) at doses of 3.0 (max + 138%) and 6.0 mg/kg IP (max + 235%); BIMG 80 (Volontè et al. 1997) (Figure 5) at doses of 3.0 (max + 64%) and 5.0 mg/kg IP (max + 164%); amperozide (Haskins et al. 1987) (Figure 6) at doses of 3.0 (max 110%) and 6.0 mg/kg IP (max + 194%); L-745,870, (Bristow et al. 1997) (Figure 7) a D4 antagonist, at doses of 5.4 (max + 89%) and 10.8 mg/kg IP (+ 130%). Two-way ANOVA of the results obtained by the different doses of neuroleptics showed a significant effect of dose and a significant dose × time interaction for clozapine (main effect: F 3,13 = 27.8, p < .001; interaction: F 27,117 = 9.88, p < .001); risperidone (main effect: F 2,9 = 22.25, p < .001; interaction: F 14,63 = 2.85, p < .005); olanzapine (main effect: F 2,9 = 35.1, p < .001; interaction: F 18,81 = 5.7, p < .001); BIMG 80 (main effect: F 2,10 = 29.1, p < .001; interaction: F 16,80 = 8,7, p < .001); amperozide (main effect: F 2,10 = 5.82, p < .05; F 14,70 = 3.53, p < .001); and L-745,870 (main effect: F 3,13 = 67.66, p < .001; interaction: F 21, 91 = 10.74, p < .001).

Figure 2
figure 2

Effect of clozapine at three doses (20, 10, and 5 mg/kg IP) on the concentration of dopamine (DA) in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

Figure 3
figure 3

Effect of risperidone at 1 and 3 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of olanzapine at 3 and 6 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

Figure 5
figure 5

Effect of BIMG 80 3 and 5 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of amperozide 6 and 3 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

Figure 7
figure 7

Effect of L-745,870 at 2.7, 5.4, and 10.8 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations. Filled symbols: p < .05 from basal values concentration; * p < .05 from the correspondent time point of vehicle group.

A classic neuroleptic, such as haloperidol (Figure 8) (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg SC), and a specific and effective D2-antagonist, such as raclopride (Hall et al. 1988) (0.14, 0.56, and 2.1 mg/kg SC) (Figure 9), failed to elicit significant change in dialysate DA in the BNST. Also devoid of a significant effect were the 5-HT2A antagonist ritanserin (Leysen et al. 1985, 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg IP), (Figure 10) and the adrenergic α1 antagonist prazosin (Baldessarini et al. 1992, 0.91 and 2.73 mg/kg IP), (Fig 11).

Figure 8
figure 8

Effect of haloperidol at 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg SC on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations.

Figure 9
figure 9

Effect of raclopride at the dose of 0.14, 0.56, and 2.1 mg/kg SC on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations.

Figure 10
figure 10

Effect of ritanserin at the dose of 0.5, and 1.5 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations.

Figure 11
figure 11

Effect of prazosin at the dose of 0.91 and 2.73 mg/kg IP on DA concentration in dialysate obtained by in vivo microdialysis from the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST). Each point is the mean ± SEM of at least four determinations.

DISCUSSION

The present study shows that clozapine and other putative atypical neuroleptics dose-dependently increase extracellular DA in the BNST; whereas, haloperidol and raclopride are ineffective, even at doses known to be fully effective in a variety of pharmacological tests (i.e., catalepsy, stimulation of DA release in the striatum, blockade of motor-stimulation by DA-receptor agonists) (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998).

Clozapine increased DA in dialysates from BNST at doses lower than those effective in raising DA concentration in dialysate from the prefrontal cortex (Nomikos et al. 1994; Volontè et al. 1997); risperidone raised DA in the BNST only at doses about twofold higher than those active in increasing dialysate DA in the prefrontal cortex (Hertel et al. 1996; Volontè et al. 1997). Olanzapine, BIMG 80, and amperozide, instead, were equipotent in increasing DA in dialysates from the BNST and from prefrontal cortex (Nomikos et al. 1994, Volontè et al. 1997, Xi-Ming et al. 1998). On the other hand, haloperidol and raclopride, which are poorly active in the prefrontal cortex (Volontè et al. 1997) are ineffective in raising DA concentration in dialysates from the BNST. These observations suggest that the mechanism by which atypical neuroleptics stimulate DA transmission in the BNST, although differing from that effective in the dorsal striatum, might be similar to that effective in the prefrontal cortex.

The mechanism by which clozapine and other atypical neuroleptics increase DA in BNST dialysates is unlikely to be attributable solely to blockade of D2 receptors. If this were the case, haloperidol and raclopride would have been fully effective in this respect. The effectiveness of amperozide on DA in the BNST and its moderate to low affinity for D2-like receptors (Meltzer et al. 1989) confirms that the ability of increasing DA in the BNST is not directly related to an action on D2-like receptors. It is possible, however, that the increase of DA in the BNST is the result of a combined action at D2 receptors and at non-DA receptors. Clozapine and other atypical neuroleptics (risperidone, olanzapine, BIMG 80) have an affinity for 5-HT2A and α1 receptors higher or in the same range of that for the D2 receptors (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998; Leysen et al. 1993, 1994; Malmberg et al. 1993); in contrast, haloperidol and raclopride have a comparatively low or no activity at 5-HT2A or α1 receptors (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998). A role of muscarinic receptors should be excluded on the basis of the low affinity of risperidone, amperozide, and BIMG-80 for these receptors. Using a similar argument, we can exclude a role of α2 receptors, given the low affinity of olanzapine, amperozide, and BIMG-80 for these receptors (Arnt and Skarsfeldt 1998; Volontè et al. 1997; Nomikos et al. 1994). On the other hand, the observation that ritanserin, a 5-HT2A/C antagonist, and prazosin, an α1 antagonist, given at pharmacologically active doses, fail to increase DA in the BNST indicates that is not the blockade of any of the above receptors by itself, which determines the property of increasing DA in the BNST. In relation to this, the limited efficacy of the specific D4-antagonist L-745,870 is also notable. L-745,870 increased dialysate from BNST by 100%, an effect that reached a plateau at the dose of 5.4 mg/kg, a rather high dose if we consider that the affinity of L-745,870 for the cloned human D4 receptors is 5 to 20- fold higher than that of haloperidol (Bristow et al. 1997).

At the moment, we tentatively propose that the property of increasing dialysate DA in the BNST, similar to that of increasing DA in the prefrontal cortex (Andersson et al. 1995), is the result of a combined blockade of D2-like (including D4) 5-HT2A and eventually α1 receptors. This possibility is, in turn, consistent with the presence in the BNST, in addition to DA, of a dense noradrenergic (Tohyama and Taketsuji 1998) and a significant serotonergic innervation (Tork 1991). This hypothesis is currently being tested in our laboratory.

Whatever the mechanism of DA stimulant effect of atypical neuroleptics in the BNST, our results raise the possibility that the DA stimulant effect of atypical neuroleptics play a role in the peculiar therapeutic profile of atypical neuroleptics. In fact, the BNST as part of the extended amygdala plays a critical role in the integration between sensory and biological properties of stimuli and in learning and expression of emotions (Alheid and Heimer 1996, 1993). Thus, blockade of DA transmission in the BNST or in other DA terminal areas, eventually combined with blockade of non-DA receptors (5-HT2A and α1), might result in a feedback increase of DA release in the BNST onto a DA receptor subtype not blocked by the atypical neuroleptic. Therefore, an increase of DA transmission onto specific DA receptor subtypes might be instrumental for the antipsychotic effects of atypical neuroleptics. Similar considerations have been applied to the increase of DA release in the prefrontal cortex, which apparently behaves in a manner similar to the BNST in response to atypical neuroleptics (Andersson et al. 1995; Hertel et al. 1996; Volontè et al. 1997). It is notable, however, that typical neuroleptics increase, although to a lesser extent, extracellular DA in the prefrontal cortex whereas, they are without effect in the BNST.

In conclusion, although the mechanism of the DA stimulant effect in the BNST observed in this study is unclear, the observation that this property is shared by drugs with a clozapine-like receptor affinity pattern suggests that such a property might be predictive of an atypical neuroleptic profile and that an action on DA transmission in the BNST may play a role in the peculiar therapeutic properties of atypical neuroleptics.