Abstract
IT has been stated by several critics that the word “Australopithecus” is a hybrid (Latin-Greek) term. I am indebted to my colleague Mr. T. J. Haarhoff, professor of classics in the University of the Witwatersrand, for the information that pithecus was a recognised naturalised Latin word in Rome. It was used by Cicero's own secretary Tiro and by other accredited writers, and more than a century before Cicero's time Plautus employed the diminutive pithecium. It is, therefore, not surprising that both of these words are to be found in a standard Latin dictionary, such as that of Lewis and Short. The still commoner cercopithecus is found in Pliny, Varro, Juvenal and Martial, to the last-named of whom (Book xiv. Epigram 202) we owe one of the most pleasing examples of the indiscriminate juxtaposition of the two words used by polished Romans for a monkey:
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DART, R. The Word “Australopithecus” and Others. Nature 115, 875 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115875b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.