Abstract
YOUR article (NATURE, August 29, 1912) on the report of the Advisory Committee having emphasised the contention from the first of some of us (students of science and old naval commanders) as to the insanity of high speed “at night in the known vicinity of ice”, it behoves surely men of science to ask the question whether we have not reached the imperative limits of that false security which the practical man is wont to feel in his contempt for scientific “theory”; and, further, whether the time has not therefore come for legislation requiring commanders of the largest ocean-going steamers to hold a diploma, guaranteeing such a systematic course of study (say in a class at Greenwich or Kensington) in marine physiography and the elementary laws of mechanics as would quicken their imagination as to the uncertainty and the magnitude of the risks to be run in an abnormally ice-drifted sea. Lord Mersey's report may whitewash the facts, but the facts en évidence remain; and the chain of cause and effect in the lamentable and tragic loss of the Titanic leads us in the last resort to the notorious contempt for scientific acquaintance with the facts and laws of nature on the part of the “practical man”.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
IRVING, A. The “Titanic”. Nature 90, 38 (1912). https://doi.org/10.1038/090038b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/090038b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.