Abstract
Rodent models implicate metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and downstream signaling pathways in addictive behaviors through metaplasticity. One way mGluRs can influence synaptic plasticity is by regulating the local translation of AMPA receptor trafficking proteins via eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2). However, genetic variation in this pathway has not been examined with human alcohol use phenotypes. Among a sample of adults living in Detroit, Michigan (Detroit Neighborhood Health Study; n=788; 83% African American), 206 genetic variants across the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway (including GRM1, GRM5, HOMER1, HOMER2, EEF2K, MTOR, EIF4E, EEF2, CAMK2A, ARC, GRIA1 and GRIA4) were found to predict number of drinking days per month (corrected P-value <0.01) when considered as a set (set-based linear regression conducted in PLINK). In addition, a CpG site located in the 3′-untranslated region on the north shore of EEF2 (cg12255298) was hypermethylated in those who drank more frequently (P<0.05). Importantly, the association between several genetic variants within the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway and alcohol use behavior (i.e., consumption and alcohol-related problems) replicated in the Grady Trauma Project (GTP), an independent sample of adults living in Atlanta, Georgia (n=1034; 95% African American), including individual variants in GRM1, GRM5, EEF2, MTOR, GRIA1, GRIA4 and HOMER2 (P<0.05). Gene-based analyses conducted in the GTP indicated that GRM1 (empirical P<0.05) and EEF2 (empirical P<0.01) withstood multiple test corrections and predicted increased alcohol consumption and related problems. In conclusion, insights from rodent studies enabled the identification of novel human alcohol candidate genes within the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Advances in genomic technology have enabled progress toward identifying genes involved in alcohol use disorders. This has led to a growing recognition of the need to understand the mechanisms underlying genotype–phenotype associations for continued progress in the translational sciences.1, 2, 3 The preference for some rodents to drink alcohol while others avoid alcohol has been used as a tool to study and target specific biological underpinnings of alcohol use behaviors since the 1940s.4 Recently, reviews of the state of the science for animal models and human association studies in alcohol use disorders have concluded that alcohol consumption is an important area of research where consilience between human and animal studies is possible. In this respect, the wealth of potential therapeutic targets collected from validated animal models of alcohol drinking could contribute to advances in the identification of mechanisms underlying genotype–phenotype associations in humans.5, 6
Chronic alcohol abuse is thought to lead to adaptations of the glutamate system that result in a ‘hyper-glutamatergic’ state.7 Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G-protein-coupled receptors that are expressed throughout the central nervous system that can be found in both the pre- and postsynaptic membrane of glutamatergic synapses. MGluRs and downstream signaling pathways are known to regulate several alcohol-related behaviors in animal studies. For example, pharmacological inhibition and genetic targeting of Group 1 mGluRs, mGlu1 and 5 (GRM1, GRM5) significantly reduces alcohol self-administration and relapse-like behavior in rodents.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Furthermore, downstream pathways including signaling through the mGlu1/5 scaffolding proteins and downstream protein kinases influence excessive alcohol consumption.16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 As a result of this compelling data, mGluRs are currently being explored as biomarkers for alcohol abuse and as pharmacologic targets for therapeutic treatment of alcohol use disorders.23, 24
Alterations in synaptic strength are one potential physiological mechanism underlying the maladaptive learning processes associated with addiction.25, 26 One particular Group 1 mGluR (mGlu1 and 5) pathway that has gained interest in addictive disorders is the mechanism by which mGluR activation controls rapid local translation of proteins involved in long-term synaptic plasticity,27 which can occur through the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2; Figure 1).28, 29 Several upstream scaffolding (i.e., Homer homolog 1-2 (HOMER1-2)), and signaling proteins (i.e., mechanistic target of rapamycin (MTOR), and eEF2-kinase (eEF2K)), influence eEF2 to act as a switch from promoting global protein synthesis to the local translation of a set of proteins, such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha, (CaMK2α) and activity-related cytoskeleton protein Arc (ARC). These proteins (CaMK2α, ARC) regulate the trafficking of α-amino-3-hydroxy-methyl-4-isoxasolepropionic acid receptors (AMPA) glutamate receptors (i.e., GRIA1-4), thereby affecting synaptic strength. Further, AMPA receptors (AMPARs), ARC and CaMK2α have independently been implicated in alcohol consumption in rodent models.30, 31, 32 Recent evidence has shown that regulating AMPAR trafficking through mGluRs in specific neural circuits can reverse addictive behaviors in rodents.33, 34 There is an abundance of evidence to suggest a link between variants in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway and alcohol use behaviors; however, this pathway has not previously been examined in humans. Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to examine genotypic variation in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway as it relates to alcohol use behavior in humans.
Although there is a large literature examining genetic influences on alcohol use behaviors, comparatively fewer studies have examined epigenetic profiles in alcohol consumption. Epigenetic modifications are regulatory mechanisms that alter gene expression without changing DNA sequence. One of the best-studied epigenetic mechanisms is DNA methylation, which may change activity in the promoter region, as well as other genic regions, and thus regulate gene transcription. Accumulating data indicate that heavy alcohol consumption can alter the methylation status of specific genes. One of the first studies35 showed a higher peripheral blood DNA methylation level in the α-synuclein gene (SNCA) in alcoholic patients than in controls. Since that time, subsequent studies using peripheral blood indicated that several other genes36, 37, 38 were more highly methylated in subjects with alcoholism than in controls. Only one of these studies examined methylation effects in an African American sample, and found that CpG sites in multiple genes were hypermethylated in alcoholic cases,39 which is consistent with findings in other populations.36, 37, 38
Drawing on samples from two community-based majority African American cohorts, the Detroit Neighborhood Health Study (DNHS) and the Grady Trauma Project (GTP), we assessed the association between frequency of alcohol consumption and genotypic variants in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR using gene-based and pathway-based analyses.40 Given the likely multifactorial nature of alcohol consumption, we hypothesize that genetic variants in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway will have a combined effect on risk for heavy alcohol consumption and related problems (in addition to other genetic and environmental influences). In the DNHS, we explore one potential mechanism underlying the genotype–phenotype association, by testing the association between alcohol consumption and methylation sites in the eEF2 region, a functional target of the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway.
Materials and methods
The DNHS
Participants include 788 individuals with available genetic data who participated in the DNHS, a longitudinal population-based cohort of male and female (57.7%) adults (18+; mean age: 52.7, s.d.: 16.4) living in Detroit, MI, USA. Participants were administered a 40-min assessment, which included demographic variables including self-identified race, sex, age, as well as questions on alcohol use, and other behavioral characteristics. Assessments were administered using structured interviews, and each participant received $25 for their participation in the survey. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained for all the participants, and all procedures in this study were approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Michigan. When asked how they would describe their racial background, 82.5% endorsed ‘Black/African American’, with the remainder of the sample endorsing ‘Asian’, ‘American Indian’, or ‘Alaska Native’, paralleling census-based estimates on individuals living in Detroit, MI, USA. Further details regarding the DNHS study background and collection can be found in Uddin et al.41
Frequency of alcohol consumption
The following question was used to assess alcohol consumption: ‘Thinking about the past 30 days on how many days did you drink any alcoholic beverages?’ Only individuals who had evidence of alcohol exposure were included in analyses so that genetic and environmental influences on the decision to initiate alcohol drinking are not confounded with genetic and environmental influences on current frequency of consumption.42 35.7% of the full sample had never consumed alcohol in their lifetime and were excluded from further analyses.
Genotypic data (DNHS)
Respondents were also asked to provide blood specimens by way of venipuncture (or by way of saliva when blood was unavailable, n=125), and received an additional $25 if they elected to do so. A total 802 samples were collected from consenting participants for genetic analysis. DNA samples were sent to the Applied Genomics Technology Facility (Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA) for genotyping using the HumanOmniExpress BeadChips (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Further details regarding genome-wide association procedures have been published previously.43 Samples were removed due to low call rate (<95%) and duplicate issues, with a remaining sample of 795 individuals (418 women and 367 men). A total of 688 890 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) passed quality control filters (call rate >95%, minor allele frequency >0.01, Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium P>1 × 10−6).
Population stratification
We used multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of genome-wide identity-by-state data implemented in PLINK version 1.07 (ref. 44) to determine genetic ancestry in the whole sample. The analysis was conducted using the 688 890 SNPs that passed quality control filters previously described. Of the 31 dimensions identified from this MDS analysis, the first two components identified clusters that highly correlate with African American and European American self-report racial identification. To reduce population stratification, we removed all individuals who described themselves as ‘White/Caucasian’ in the association analyses (n=7). All 31 MDS components were used to adjust for any remaining population stratification in the association analyses.
In the following analyses, we analyzed 206 SNPs available and meeting quality control criteria (call rate >95%, minor allele frequency >0.01, Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium P>1 × 10−6) within 100 kb upstream and downstream of each of the genes of interest in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway (detailed in Table 1 and Figure 1), which was compiled from several lines of research demonstrating the role of Group 1 mGluRs and downstream signaling pathways in the local translation of proteins in neuronal dendrites.45, 46, 47 We focused on genes encoding proteins that initiate the local translation of CaMK2α and ARC with eEF2. AMPA receptor genes (GRIA1 and 4) were included as the trafficking of these proteins are the functional consequence targeted by this pathway. Genotypic analyses included 15 SNPs in glutamate receptor metabotropic 1 (GRM1), 38 SNPs in glutamate receptor metabotropic 5 (GRM5), 31 SNPs in Homer homolog 1 (HOMER1), 38 SNPs in Homer homolog 2 (HOMER2), 15 SNPs in MTOR, 19 SNPs in eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase (EEF2K), 8 SNPs in Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E (EIF4E), 4 SNPs in Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Factor 2 (EEF2), 13 SNPs in calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMK2A), 3 SNPs in activity-related cytoskeleton protein Arc (ARC), 9 SNPs in glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 1 (GRIA1) and 13 SNPs in glutamate receptor, ionotropic, AMPA 4 (GRIA4). Note that GRIA2 and GRIA3 were excluded from these analyses due to exclusions based on quality control criteria (call rate >95%, minor allele frequency >0.01, Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium P>1 × 10−6).
DNA methylation data (DNHS)
A total 179 blood samples were obtained from consenting participants via venipuncture and whole-blood-derived genomic DNA was isolated from 400 ml of whole blood using the DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. One microgram of the resulting genomic DNA was then submitted for DNA methylation profiling by the genomics core facility, AGTC, at Wayne State University using the HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (Illumina). Genomic DNA was denatured and bisulfite converted using the Zymo EZ-96 DNA Methylation kit deep well format (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), following the alternative incubation protocol. Bisulfite converted DNA was amplified, fragmented and hybridized to the HumanMethylation450 Beadchip using standard Illumina Infinium Methylation HD protocol. Arrays were then scanned on the Illumina iScan using standard Illumina scanner settings. The resulting raw DNA methylation data were imported from IDAT files, Illumina's proprietary file format, using the R package ChAMP48 of Bioconductor.49 Use of over-the-counter and prescription drug medication was documented (0=no medication use; 1=any medication use) during the in-home visits when the biologic specimens were collected.
In accordance with this study’s hypothesis, and to reduce the number of tests run (and the related need for multiple test corrections), we analyzed eight CpG sites available within 100 kb upstream and downstream of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (EEF2) detailed in Table 2. All individuals who had data at the eight CpG sites and alcohol consumption data were included in analyses (analytic sample=154).
The GTP, genotypic replication sample
The GTP is a population of male and female (71.8%) adults (Mean age: 39.5, s.d.: 13.4) approached while in the waiting rooms of primary care or obstetrical–gynecological clinics of Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, USA. This population predominantly (95.2%) self-identifies as ‘African American/Black’, the remainder of the sample self-identifies as ‘White’ (3.3%) or ‘Other.’ Participants were paid $15 for this phase of the study. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained for all participants, and all procedures in this study were approved by the institutional review boards of Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA. Participants completed a battery of self-report measures that took 45 to 75 min to complete.
Alcohol consumption and related hazardous behaviors
Measures of alcohol use were obtained by verbal interview using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT50). Each of the 10 AUDIT items is rated on a scale of 0–4, with higher scores reflecting more problematic alcohol drinking. The first question of the AUDIT was used to examine alcohol consumption: ‘During the last year, on average, how many drinks containing alcohol do you have on a typical drinking day?’ Individuals who had never consumed alcohol in their lifetime (43%, those answering ‘never’ to the question above) were excluded from analyses. Other AUDIT items address problematic behavior or consequences accompanying heavy alcohol consumption, such as ‘How often during the last year have you failed to do what was normally expected of you because of drinking?’ and ‘How often during the last year have you been unable to remember what happened the night before because of drinking?’. Thus, the GTP measure of alcohol consumption differs from that obtained in the DNHS in its time period (DNHS: past 30 days; GTP: past year) and that it also includes alcohol consumption-related hazardous behaviors. Twin and molecular genetic studies have shown that there is evidence for shared genetic influences across different phenotypes.51, 52 Therefore, convergent findings from these two alcohol phenotypes (frequency of consumption in past 30 days vs AUDIT scores) would increase support for findings. Full data were available on 1034 participants.
Genotypic data (GTP)
GTP participants provided a saliva sample using Oragene saliva kits (DNAGenotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada), and genotyping was conducted using Illumina’s Omni1-Quad BeadChip. The Omni1-Quad BeadChip interrogates 1 011 219 individual SNPs. Genotypes were called using Illumina’s GenomeStudio software. PLINK version 1.07 (ref. 44) was used to perform quality control analyses on the genotypic data. When comparing the genotyped individuals to the non-genotyped individuals, no significant differences in demographic or phenotypic measures relevant to this study were found.
Population stratification
MDS analysis conducted in PLINK was run on 1 011 219 SNPs to infer axes of ancestry. On the basis of MDS, African American subjects who fell within three standard deviations of the medians of the first and second MDS component in this sample were retained (92%). To reduce population stratification, we removed all individuals who described themselves as ‘White’ in the association analyses (3.3%). All MDS components were used to adjust for any remaining population stratification in the association analyses.
Statistical analyses
For the DNHS samples (genotypic n=676; methylation n=154), descriptive statistics on key variables, as well as comparisons between the subset of individuals with methylation data to the genotypic sample are provided in Table 3. In addition, descriptive statistics on key variables for the GTP genotypic sample are provided in Table 3. Frequency of alcohol consumption was standardized (z-scored) and modeled as a continuous variable. We assessed main effects of all 206 SNPs and eight CpG sites available using the SNP or methylation beta value as predictors, controlling for demographic characteristics (age, sex and ancestry components), behavioral characteristics (smoking, medication use for methylation analyses only) and peripheral blood mononuclear cell count. Methylation beta values were centered to the mean in all models.
Gene-based and pathway-based tests were conducted in PLINK (Purcell, 2003) using set-based analyses (‘—set-test’). Gene-based tests included all available SNPs in a given gene, corrected for the number of independent signals (i.e., linkage disequilibrium blocks) within that gene set. Pathway-based tests included all available SNPs within each of the genes considered in the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway, corrected for the number of independent signals (i.e., linkage disequilibrium blocks) within that pathway set. In the main effects model, SNP coefficients were accepted as significant if the 100 000 permutations of the set-based regression analysis (Bonferroni corrected for the number of independent signals within the set) produced an empirical P-value <0.05. Coefficients for gene methylation value were accepted as significant if P<0.006, based on the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (P-value significance threshold of 0.05/8 CpG sites examined was P<0.006). Finally, post hoc analyses of individual SNPs included in the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway were conducted to provide further information on each individual variant. These analyses were conducted in PLINK using linear regression for a quantitative phenotype.
In an effort to replicate the genotypic analyses conducted in the DNHS, parallel analyses were conducted in the GTP (genotypic n=1352). In the GTP, AUDIT scores were modeled as continuous variables. Using the same parameters as described above (regression analyses controlling for demographic characteristics: age, sex and principal components), gene-based and pathway-based tests were conducted in PLINK using set-based analyses. As described above, post hoc analyses of individual SNPs included in the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway were conducted to provide further information on each individual variant in the GTP.
Results
Key demographic characteristics of the DNHS and GTP participants are presented in Table 3.
Genotypic results (gene-based and pathway-based set tests)
Pathway-based and gene-based tests of association are detailed in Table 1, and individual SNP associations are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
Gene-based analyses indicated that GRM1 (empirical P<0.05), MTOR (empirical P<0.05), EIF4E (empirical P<0.05), EEF2 (empirical P<0.05) and CAMK2A (empirical P<0.05) withstood multiple test corrections and predicted increased alcohol consumption in the DNHS. Pathway-based analyses indicated that 206 variants across each of these genes considered as a single set significantly predicted alcohol consumption in the DNHS (empirical P<0.0001). This association withstood correction for the number of independent signals tested across these 206 variants (seven linkage disequilibrium blocks). Several individual SNPs across GRM1, GRM5, HOMER1, HOMER2, MTOR, EIF4E, EEF2, CAMK2A and GRIA4 were associated with increased alcohol consumption in the DNHS (Supplementary Table S1). However, most of these SNP associations did not remain significant after a Bonferroni test correction (0.05/206 individual variants requires a P-value threshold of P<0.0002).
In an effort to replicate our findings from the DNHS, we tested for association between variants in GRM1, GRM5, HOMER1, HOMER2, EEF2K, MTOR, EIF4E, EEF2, CAMK2A, ARC, GRIA1, GRIA4 and alcohol use behavior (AUDIT) in the GTP. Although the association between this pathway (174 SNPs) and alcohol consumption only trended towards significance in the GTP (pathway-based empirical P-value=0.09), several variants within this pathway were associated with alcohol consumption in the GTP, including variants in GRM1, GRM5, HOMER4, MTOR, EEF2, GRIA and GRIA4 (P<0.05; individual SNP results detailed in Supplementary Table S1). Further, gene-based analyses indicated that GRM1 (empirical P<0.05), and EEF2 (empirical P<0.05), withstood multiple test corrections and, as in the DNHS, predicted increased alcohol use behavior in the GTP (Table 1).
DNA methylation results
Of the eight CpG sites examined across the EEF2 region in the DNHS, one site (cg12255298), located in the 3’-untranslated region on the north shore of eEF2 (chromosome 19, BP: 3 976 193–3 976 193), was significantly and positively related to alcohol consumption (B=0.419, P=0.004) and withstood a multiple test correction (0.05/8=0.006). For individuals with higher drinking days per month (1 s.d. above the mean), cg12255298 was hypermethylated as compared with individuals with fewer drinking days per month (1 s.d. below the mean). This relationship is depicted in Figure 2.
Discussion
We believe this is the first study to examine the association between human alcohol use and variants in the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway (Figure 1), which have been implicated in rodent studies of alcohol consumption and addiction. Drawing on samples from a community-based majority African American cohort, the DNHS, we found that genetic variants within this pathway (including GRM1, GRM5, MTOR, EIF4E, EEF2 and CAMK2A) predicted number of drinking days per month when considered as a set. Further, a CpG site in the 3′-untranslated region on the north shore of EEF2 (cg12255298) was hypermethylated in those who drank more frequently. Importantly, the association between alcohol use behavior and several SNPs within this pathway (including SNPS within GRM1, HOMER1, HOMER4, EIF4E, EEF2, GRIA1 and GRIA4) were replicated in an independent sample, the GTP. When considered as a set in the GTP, the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway only approached significance (empirical P-value=0.09), with significant gene-based effects observed for GRM1 and EEF2. Taken together, these results suggest that insights gained from rodent studies enabled the examination of novel alcohol candidate genes within the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway. Such pathway-based approaches,40 combined with functional genomic data, can aid the field in identifying mechanisms underlying phenotype–genotype associations.
Several studies have linked mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR related genes (for example, GRM1, GRM5, CaMK2α, GRIA1-4) to alcohol use behaviors in rodents.9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 However, relatively few studies have examined these genetic variants in human genetic association studies. Exceptions include variants in GRM5, CAMK2A and GRIA2, which have independently been identified in association studies of alcohol use phenotypes in humans,31, 40, 59 with preclinical rodent models supporting their role in functional regulation of alcohol self-administration.8, 19, 22, 31, 32, 60, 61 To our knowledge, the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway variants implicated in this study have not been previously associated (at the genome-wide level) with alcohol consumption behavior in large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This includes the largest GWAS of alcohol consumption behavior conducted on 26 316 individuals (replication N=21 185; ref. 59). However, one recent study31 used GWAS data to test 23 SNPs within CAMK2A; 7/23 SNPs were found to be significantly associated with alcohol dependence, one of which (intronic CAMK2A SNP rs7711562) is implicated in this study’s findings. Notably, the participants in the Schumann et al. GWAS, as well as other previously published large GWAS of alcohol use behavior (for example, findings from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism62 and IMAGEN59) are largely of European ancestry. This study’s findings may indicate the potential to identify novel genetic risk variants for alcohol use behavior in populations of African ancestry. Importantly, these findings should be replicated in other admixed populations to determine whether mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR effects are more relevant to alcohol use behavior in specific populations.
Although this study emphasizes a systems-based approach to genetic association (i.e., gene-based and pathway-based tests of association), the individual SNPs most robustly associated with alcohol use behavior in this study are detailed in Supplementary Table 1. Little is known about the functional relevance of most of these SNPs, however we do note that GRM1 variant rs2235875, which is significantly associated with alcohol use behavior across the DNHS and GTP, is an intronic variant and rs3170368, which is also associated with alcohol use behavior across both samples, is a variant located in the 3′-untranslated region of EEF2.
Previous studies examining methylation patterns in alcohol use phenotypes have found that CpG sites are typically hypermethylated among alcoholic cases as compared with controls.35, 36, 37, 39 The methylation patterns observed in this study are consistent with previous studies of other genes,35, 36, 37, 39 in that CpG sites located within EEF2 are hypermethylated in heavier drinkers (1 s.d. above the mean level of alcohol consumption) as compared with lighter drinkers (1 s.d. below the mean level of alcohol consumption). Given the relatively small sample sizes in the present study, particularly for the epigenetic subsample, these genetic and epigenetic effects should be replicated in future studies with greater sample size and ancestral diversity.
Several mechanisms linking altered excitatory neuroplasticity to substance abuse have been hypothesized.23, 63 For example, there has been an increased focus on how drugs of abuse (including alcohol) affect glutamate synaptic plasticity in mesocorticolimbic circuitry that may explain the selective and enduring nature of addiction.64 It is now well supported that acute and long-term alcohol exposure alters glutamatergic synaptic plasticity in preclinical animal models.56, 65, 66, 67, 68 Signaling through mGluRs can modulate synaptic plasticity by regulating the insertion of AMPARs in the postsynaptic membrane. AMPAR trafficking underlies multiple mechanisms of neuroplasticity implicated in drug addiction including unsilencing of synapses, long-term potentiation, long-term depression and synaptic scaling.27, 45, 69 Genotypic variation in this pathway may lead to individual differences in the response to alcohol consumption. For instance, SNPs detected here may influence the expression of proteins in this pathway and evidence from genetic manipulations in preclinical models support their role in alcohol consumption.15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 55 Furthermore, long-term alterations in glutamate transmission that occur following drug/alcohol exposure have subsequently been shown to functionally regulate addictive behaviors such as drug sensitization, motivation and relapse-like behavior.70, 71, 72 Therefore, the variants in the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway may not only influence behavioral components of alcohol consumption but also the susceptibility to developing an alcohol use disorder. This has led to the interest in AMPAR and mGluR modulators as potential pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorders.23, 24, 63, 64 Given that GRM1 (and not GRM5) was found to be associated with alcohol use behavior, these findings emphasize its role regulating alcohol consumption in humans.
This study indicates a role for the mGluR–eEF2–AMPAR pathway in human alcohol use behavior, and adds support to the cross-species evidence for this pathway in alcohol use behavior. Furthermore, this study is the first to find a significant association of GRM1 and/or EEF2 with alcohol use behavior. However, the results of this study should be interpreted in light of several key limitations. First, sample sizes in both the DNHS and the GTP were limited; this study only had adequate power to detect 78% and 92% of main effects with risk ratios >1, given the parameters of the DNHS and GTP, respectively. However, the cross-species consilience, as well as the replication of variants (GRM1 and EEF2) in an independent sample lessens this concern.5, 6 Second, the present analysis uses data available at a single time point, using retrospective reports of alcohol behavior measured differently in two population-based samples. Twin and molecular genetic studies have shown that different measures of alcohol phenotypes can yield significantly different findings.51, 52 However, there is also evidence for shared genetic influences across different phenotypes.51 Therefore, convergent findings from these two alcohol phenotypes (frequency of consumption in past 30 days vs AUDIT scores) increase support for these findings. In addition, previous studies have found that individuals typically underreport their drinking consumption,73, 74 which would likely diminish the association effects observed in this study. However, recent studies directly comparing retrospective reports to observational data conclude that this bias is significantly less pronounced in regular drinkers and when less time has passed since the drinking days being recalled.74 Therefore, the past recent drinking period examined in this study somewhat mitigates this concern. Third, the variants included in this pathway analysis were limited by availability of genotypes in the DNHS and GTP. For example, GRIA2 and GRIA3 were excluded from this study due to exclusions based on quality control criteria (call rate >95%, minor allele frequency >0.01, Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium P>1 × 10−6). Finally, in addition to genetic and epigenetic influences on alcohol consumption, key aspects of the contextual environment have a large impact on alcohol use behaviors. Due to the focus on a novel pathway, and limited power to examine gene–environment interactions in this statistical paradigm, environmental influences were not examined in the present study and should be included in future studies.
Although advances in genomic technology and bioinformatics have enabled progress toward identifying some genes involved in alcohol use disorders, few studies conducted in human samples have identified mechanisms underlying genotype–phenotype associations. These mechanisms are important for downstream use in the translational sciences including pharmacologic, clinical and public health interventions.1, 2, 3 In this study, we utilized two established approaches to delve further into the associations observed between genotypic variation and alcohol consumption in two human samples. This study used insights gained from rodent studies to identify novel alcohol candidate genes within the mGluR–eEf2–AMPAR pathway and to elucidate mechanisms related to altered glutamatergic transmission and synaptic plasticity. Given the findings from the present study, there is growing support for the role of GRM1 and EEF2 in alcohol use behaviors across species and across methodologies. Such translationally informed pathway approaches offer promise in propelling the field towards understanding mechanisms underlying phenotype–genotype associations.
References
Maric NP, Svrakic DM . Why schizophrenia genetics needs epigenetics: a review. Psychiatr Danub 2012; 24: 2–18.
Feltus FA . Systems genetics: a paradigm to improve discovery of candidate genes and mechanisms underlying complex traits. Plant Sci 2014; 223C: 45–48.
Spanagel R, Durstewitz D, Hansson A, Heinz A, Kiefer F, Köhr G et al. A systems medicine research approach for studying alcohol addiction. Addict Biol 2013; 18: 883–896.
Foroud T, Edenberg HJ, Crabbe JC . Genetic research: who is at risk for alcoholism. Alcohol Res Health 2010; 33: 64–75.
Crabbe JC . Consilience of rodent and human phenotypes relevant for alcohol dependence. Addict Biol 2010; 15: 103–108.
Barkley-Levenson AM, Crabbe JC . Bridging animal and human models: translating from (and to) animal genetics. Alcohol Res 2012; 34: 325–335.
Tsai G, Coyle JT . The role of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of alcoholism. Annu Rev Med 1998; 49: 173–184.
Bäckström P, Bachteler D, Koch S, Hyytiä P, Spanagel R . mGluR5 antagonist MPEP reduces ethanol-seeking and relapse behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 921–928.
Schroeder JP, Overstreet DH, Hodge CW . The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP decreases operant ethanol self-administration during maintenance and after repeated alcohol deprivations in alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2005; 179: 262–270.
Schroeder JP, Spanos M, Stevenson JR, Besheer J, Salling M, Hodge CW . Cue-induced reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behavior is associated with increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in specific limbic brain regions: blockade by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. Neuropharmacology 2008; 55: 546–554.
Bäckström P, Hyytiä P . Ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonism attenuates cue-induced cocaine seeking. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31: 778–786.
Hodge CW, Grant KA, Becker HC, Besheer J, Crissman AM, Platt DM et al. Understanding how the brain perceives alcohol: neurobiological basis of ethanol discrimination. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30: 203–213.
Besheer J, Faccidomo S, Grondin JJM, Hodge CW . Regulation of motivation to self-administer ethanol by mGluR5 in alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2008; 32: 209–221.
Besheer J, Grondin JJM, Cannady R, Sharko AC, Faccidomo S, Hodge CW . Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 activity in the nucleus accumbens is required for the maintenance of ethanol self-administration in a rat genetic model of high alcohol intake. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 812–822.
Blednov YA, Harris RA . Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) regulation of ethanol sedation, dependence and consumption: relationship to acamprosate actions. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11: 775–793.
Cozzoli DK, Courson J, Caruana AL, Miller BW, Greentree DI, Thompson AB et al. Nucleus accumbens mGluR5-associated signaling regulates binge alcohol drinking under drinking-in-the-dark procedures. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012; 36: 1623–1633.
Cozzoli DK, Courson J, Wroten MG, Greentree DI, Lum EN, Campbell RR et al. Binge alcohol drinking by mice requires intact group1 metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling within the central nucleus of the amygdale. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39: 435–444.
Lum EN, Campbell RR, Rostock C, Szumlinski KK . mGluR1 within the nucleus accumbens regulates alcohol intake in mice under limited-access conditions. Neuropharmacology 2014; 79: 679–687.
Olive MF, McGeehan AJ, Kinder JR, McMahon T, Hodge CW, Janak PH et al. The mGluR5 antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine decreases ethanol consumption via a protein kinase C epsilon-dependent mechanism. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 67: 349–355.
Goulding SP, Obara I, Lominac KD, Gould AT, Miller BW, Klugmann M et al. Accumbens Homer2-mediated signaling: a factor contributing to mouse strain differences in alcohol drinking? Genes Brain Behav 2011; 10: 111–126.
Szumlinski KK, Lominac KD, Oleson EB, Walker JK, Mason A, Dehoff MH et al. Homer2 is necessary for EtOH-induced neuroplasticity. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 7054–7061.
Cozzoli DK, Goulding SP, Zhang PW, Xiao B, Hu J-H, Ary AW et al. Binge drinking upregulates accumbens mGluR5-Homer2-PI3K signaling: functional implications for alcoholism. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 8655–8668.
Holmes A, Spanagel R, Krystal JH . Glutamatergic targets for new alcohol medications. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013; 229: 539–554.
Olive MF . Metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands as potential therapeutics for addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2009; 2: 83–98.
Roberto M, Gilpin NW, Siggins GR . The central amygdala and alcohol: role of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, and neuropeptides. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012; 2: a012195.
Stuber GD, Britt JP, Bonci A . Optogenetic modulation of neural circuits that underlie reward seeking. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 71: 1061–1067.
Lüscher C, Huber KM . Group 1 mGluR-dependent synaptic long-term depression: mechanisms and implications for circuitry and disease. Neuron 2010; 65: 445–459.
Verpelli C, Piccoli G, Zibetti C, Zanchi A, Gardoni F, Huang K et al. Synaptic activity controls dendritic spine morphology by modulating eEF2-dependent BDNF synthesis. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 5830–5842.
Weatherill DB, McCamphill PK, Pethoukov E, Dunn TW, Fan X, Sossin WS . Compartment-specific, differential regulation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 and its kinase within Aplysia sensory neurons. J Neurochem 2011; 117: 841–855.
Pandey SC, Zhang H, Ugale R, Prakash A, Xu T, Misra K . Effector immediate-early gene arc in the amygdala plays a critical role in alcoholism. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 2589–2600.
Easton AC, Lucchesi W, Lourdusamy A, Lenz B, Solati J, Golub Y et al. αCaMKII autophosphorylation controls the establishment of alcohol drinking behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013; 38: 1636–1647.
Salling MC, Faccidomo SP, Li C, Psilos K, Galunas C, Spanos M et al. Moderate alcohol drinking and the amygdala proteome: identification and validation of calcium/calmodulin dependent kinase II and AMPA receptor activity as novel molecular mechanisms of the positive reinforcing effects of alcohol. Biol Psychiatry 2014.
Pascoli V, Terrier J, Espallergues J, Valjent E, O’Connor EC, Lüscher C . Contrasting forms of cocaine-evoked plasticity control components of relapse. Nature 2014; 509: 459–464.
Loweth JA, Scheyer AF, Milovanovic M, LaCrosse AL, Flores-Barrera E, Werner CT et al. Synaptic depression via mGluR1 positive allosteric modulation suppresses cue-induced cocaine craving. Nat Neurosci 2014; 17: 73–80.
Bönsch D, Lenz B, Kornhuber J, Bleich S . DNA hypermethylation of the alpha synuclein promoter in patients with alcoholism. Neuroreport 2005; 16: 167–170.
Philibert RA, Gunter TD, Beach SRH, Brody GH, Madan A . MAOA methylation is associated with nicotine and alcohol dependence in women. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2008; 147B: 565–570.
Biermann T, Reulbach U, Lenz B, Frieling H, Muschler M, Hillemacher T et al. N-methyl-D-aspartate 2b receptor subtype (NR2B) promoter methylation in patients during alcohol withdrawal. J Neural Transm 2009; 116: 615–622.
Zhang H, Herman AI, Kranzler HR, Anton RF, Zhao H, Zheng W et al. Array-based profiling of DNA methylation changes associated with alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: E108–E115.
Zhang R, Miao Q, Wang C, Zhao R, Li W, Haile CN et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in alcohol dependence. Addict Biol 2013; 18: 392–403.
Karpyak VM, Geske JR, Colby CL, Mrazek DA, Biernacka JM . Genetic variability in the NMDA-dependent AMPA trafficking cascade is associated with alcohol dependence. Addict Biol 2012; 17: 798–806.
Uddin M, Aiello AE, Wildman DE, Koenen KC, Pawelec G, De Los Santos R et al. Epigenetic and immune function profiles associated with posttraumatic stress disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 9470–9475.
Sartor CE, Nelson EC, Lynskey MT, Madden PAF, Heath AC, Bucholz KK . Are there differences between young African-American and European-American women in the relative influences of genetics versus environment on age at first drink and problem alcohol use? Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 1939–1946.
Logue MW, Baldwin C, Guffanti G, Melista E, Wolf EJ, Reardon AF et al. A genome-wide association study of post-traumatic stress disorder identifies the retinoid-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) gene as a significant risk locus. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 18: 937–942.
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 559–575.
Bramham CR, Worley PF, Moore MJ, Guzowski JF . The immediate early gene arc/arg3.1: regulation, mechanisms, and function. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 11760–11767.
Ohtani Y, Miyata M, Hashimoto K, Tabata T, Kishimoto Y, Fukaya M et al. The synaptic targeting of mGluR1 by its carboxyl-terminal domain is crucial for cerebellar function. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 2702–2712.
Piccinin S, Thuault SJ, Doherty AJ, Brown JT, Randall AD, Davies CH et al. The induction of long-term plasticity of non-synaptic, synchronized activity by the activation of group I mGluRs. Neuropharmacology 2008; 55: 459–463.
Morris TJ, Butcher LM, Feber A, Teschendorff AE, Chakravarthy AR, Wojdacz TK et al. ChAMP: 450k chip analysis methylation pipeline. Bioinformatics 2014; 30: 428–430.
Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004; 5: R80.
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M . Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption—II. Addiction 1993; 88: 791–804.
Dick DM, Meyers JL, Rose RJ, Kaprio J, Kendler KS . Measures of current alcohol consumption and problems: two independent twin studies suggest a complex genetic architecture. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011; 35: 2152–2161.
Meyers JL, Nyman E, Loukola A, Rose RJ, Kaprio J, Dick DM . The association between DRD2/ANKK1 and genetically informed measures of alcohol use and problems. Addict Biol 2013; 18: 523–536.
Lominac KD, Kapasova Z, Hannun RA, Patterson C, Middaugh LD, Szumlinski KK . Behavioral and neurochemical interactions between Group 1 mGluR antagonists and ethanol: potential insight into their anti-addictive properties. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006; 85: 142–156.
Hodge CW, Miles MF, Sharko AC, Stevenson RA, Hillmann JR, Lepoutre V et al. The mGluR5 antagonist MPEP selectively inhibits the onset and maintenance of ethanol self-administration in C57BL/6 J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006; 183: 429–438.
Bird MK, Lawrence AJ . Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors: involvement in drug-seeking and drug-induced plasticity. Curr Mol Pharmacol 2009; 2: 83–94.
Wang J, Ben Hamida S, Darcq E, Zhu W, Gibb SL, Lanfranco MF et al. Ethanol-mediated facilitation of AMPA receptor function in the dorsomedial striatum: implications for alcohol drinking behavior. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 15124–15132.
Hong-Brown LQ, Brown CR, Huber DS, Lang CH . Alcohol and indinavir adversely affect protein synthesis and phosphorylation of MAPK and mTOR signaling pathways in C2C12 myocytes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006; 30: 1297–1307.
Sanchis-Segura C, Borchardt T, Vengeliene V, Zghoul T, Bachteler D, Gass P et al. Involvement of the AMPA receptor GluR-C subunit in alcohol-seeking behavior and relapse. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 1231–1238.
Schumann G, Coin LJ, Lourdusamy A, Charoen P, Berger KH, Stacey D et al. Genome-wide association and genetic functional studies identify autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2) in the regulation of alcohol consumption. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 7119–7124.
Besheer J, Faccidomo S, Grondin JJM, Hodge CW . Effects of mGlu1-receptor blockade on ethanol self-administration in inbred alcohol-preferring rats. Alcohol 2008; 42: 13–20.
Cannady R, Fisher KR, Durant B, Besheer J, Hodge CW . Enhanced AMPA receptor activity increases operant alcohol self-administration and cue-induced reinstatement. Addict Biol 2013; 18: 54–65.
Kapoor M, Wang J-C, Wetherill L, Le N, Bertelsen S, Hinrichs AL et al. A meta-analysis of two genome-wide association studies to identify novel loci for maximum number of alcoholic drinks. Hum Genet 2013; 132: 1141–1151.
Kalivas PW, Volkow ND . New medications for drug addiction hiding in glutamatergic neuroplasticity. Mol Psychiatry 2011; 16: 974–986.
Olive MF, Cleva RM, Kalivas PW, Malcolm RJ . Glutamatergic medications for the treatment of drug and behavioral addictions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2012; 100: 801–810.
McCool BA, Christian DT, Diaz MR, Läck AK . Glutamate plasticity in the drunken amygdala: the making of an anxious synapse. Int Rev Neurobiol 2010; 91: 205–233.
Christian DT, Alexander NJ, Diaz MR, Robinson S, McCool BA . Chronic intermittent ethanol and withdrawal differentially modulate basolateral amygdala AMPA-type glutamate receptor function and trafficking. Neuropharmacology 2012; 62: 2430–2439.
Fujii S, Yamazaki Y, Sugihara T, Wakabayashi I . Acute and chronic ethanol exposure differentially affect induction of hippocampal LTP. Brain Res 2008; 1211: 13–21.
Jeanes ZM, Buske TR, Morrisett RA . In vivo chronic intermittent ethanol exposure reverses the polarity of synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens shell. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011; 336: 155–164.
Thomas GM, Lin D-T, Nuriya M, Huganir RL . Rapid and bi-directional regulation of AMPA receptor phosphorylation and trafficking by JNK. EMBO J 2008; 27: 361–372.
Sanchis-Segura C, Spanagel R . Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: an overview. Addict Biol 2006; 11: 2–38.
Schmidt HD, Pierce RC . Cocaine-induced neuroadaptations in glutamate transmission: potential therapeutic targets for craving and addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1187: 35–75.
Stuber GD, Hopf FW, Tye KM, Chen BT, Bonci A . Neuroplastic alterations in the limbic system following cocaine or alcohol exposure. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2010; 3: 3–27.
Ekholm O . Influence of the recall period on self-reported alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004; 58: 60–63.
Ekholm O, Strandberg-Larsen K, Grønbæk M . Influence of the recall period on a beverage-specific weekly drinking measure for alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: 520–525.
Acknowledgements
The contents of this manuscript do not reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government. Main DNHS grant: R01DA022720, DNHS Supplement: R01DA011720-03S1, DNHS Epigenetics: RC1MH088283, DNHS PhenX: R01DA022720-05S1, JLM Funding: T32MH013043, MCS Funding: F32AA022028.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Translational Psychiatry website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Meyers, J., Salling, M., Almli, L. et al. Frequency of alcohol consumption in humans; the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors and downstream signaling pathways. Transl Psychiatry 5, e586 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.70
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.70
This article is cited by
-
Arc controls alcohol cue relapse by a central amygdala mechanism
Molecular Psychiatry (2023)
-
BNST specific mGlu5 receptor knockdown regulates sex-dependent expression of negative affect produced by adolescent ethanol exposure and adult stress
Translational Psychiatry (2021)
-
Adolescent alcohol exposure produces sex differences in negative affect-like behavior and group I mGluR BNST plasticity
Neuropsychopharmacology (2020)
-
GPCR and Alcohol-Related Behaviors in Genetically Modified Mice
Neurotherapeutics (2020)
-
Targeting the intracellular signaling “STOP” and “GO” pathways for the treatment of alcohol use disorders
Psychopharmacology (2018)