This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
February 13, 2011 | By:  Leyla Adali
Aa Aa Aa

Do Vaccines Cause Autism?

Hi everyone, Leyla this week! So for this post, I thought we might delve into the topic of autism as promised in our intro blog. My mother's a clinical psychologist, so I've been hearing about this topic--and autism in general--for a while. Autism is a disorder that strikes very early in life, and it affects social cognition and interaction. Most often, it is accompanied by mental retardation, but the two don't go hand in hand, which is a common misconception.

There's been a lot of controversy in the news lately about the recent discovery that the study linking autism and vaccines was apparently invalid. According to the British Medical Journal (BMJ) the study's author, Andrew Wakefield, knowingly tampered with the results he garnered in his study--possibly due to unsavory ulterior motives. One may expect that parents across the world may now breathe a sigh of relief; however, it appears as though Andrew Wakefield's study has caused some long-lasting damage to families world wide.

So, a bit of background information in case you didn't know the details; in 1998, Andrew Wakefield, a British surgeon, published an article in The Lancet claiming that there was a link between autism and the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine. After the BMJ study was released, Mr. Wakefield, who incidentally had his medical license revoked in May, continued to defend his study, backed by a surprising number of parents whose children were afflicted with autism. These parents included Jenny McCarthy and JB Handley, an activist interviewed on CNN's Parker Spitzer (I'm still pretty shocked by his interview, which you can watch here).

Despite the news that Wakefield's claims were invalid, recent polls reveal that 18% of Americans still believe that there is a link between MMR and autism, while 30% aren't sure what to believe. While 92% of American children are still fully vaccinated, there was a shocking number of measles cases in 2008, and, according to the CDC, over 90% of these children hadn't been vaccinated. This was 10 years after Andrew Wakefield's study had been published. Coincidence? I think not.

Now for my opinion, which would best be described like this: if I walk over to you, and you blink, was it because I walked up to you or because you would have blinked anyway? In other words, if a child is vaccinated at a young age--before autism is detectable--and signs of autism spring up shortly afterwards, was it because of the vaccine, or did the child have autism all along? It's hard to determine if a child has autism before the 2 year mark. This is where the misunderstanding begins.

If you've watched that J.B. Handley interview (go watch it now if you haven't yet!) you might be wondering about the "recent" SUNY Stony Brook study Mr. Handley keeps mentioning. Upon further inspection, I learned that the study uses information garnered between 1997 and 2001, prior to the BMJ study refuting the link between autism and vaccines.

So, in the end it's every parent's individual decision. The world is clearly still distrustful of vaccines, but it has to be decided whether the benefits of having one's child vaccinated against deadly diseases collectively outweigh the fear of autism that still lies in many parents' hearts.

References

CNN Wire Staff. "Medical journal: Study linking autism, vaccines is 'elaborate fraud'." CNN Health. January 6, 2011.

Gardner, Amanda. "Nearly half of Americans still suspect vaccine-autism link." USA Today. January 23, 2011.

11 Comments
Comments
March 10, 2011 | 03:34 AM
Posted By:  Taylor Fawcett
Amazing Post Leyla! I would like to raise the point that a disease could be dormant for quite sometime and you would never know. Is it possible for a disease to pop up out of nowhere? Yes, but usually their is a stimulus creating in the first place.There are some other new studies and recent discoveries show promising results with the effects of hyperbaric therapy on persons with Autism. SPECT scans each patient’s brain taken before and after the hyperbaric treatments to show physical changes to the brain tissue. The SPECT scan showed an increase to the blood flow and oxygen to the temporal lobe. SPECT scans of patients taken before hyperbaric treatments showed a significant amount of dormant activity while scans taken of patient brains after hyperbaric indicated an increase in brain activity and blood flow. After hyperbaric therapy, dormant brain regions were replaced with greater functioning tissues and represented a scan more similar to a healthy individual.
March 09, 2011 | 10:25 PM
Posted By:  Daniel Turchiano
Great post, Leyla! I found an articles explaining why Wakefield tried to create this hoax. He intended to make a profit off of it! After working with a lawyer, Richard Barr, he realized that he very well may be able to sue the vaccine manufacturing companies. It was predicted that if this plan followed through, several companies in US and Britain could have been sued for an estimate of 40 million US dollars per year! After several forms of evidence had been found negating his proposition, he admitted to conveying false information. He was stripped of his license and his study has been retracted.
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-01/british-doctor-faked-data-linking-vaccines-autism-and-hoped-profit-it
http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5258.full
March 09, 2011 | 10:23 PM
Posted By:  Daniel Turchiano
Great post, Leyla! I found an articles explaining why Wakefield tried to create this hoax. He intended to make a profit off of it! After working with a lawyer, Richard Barr, he realized that he very well may be able to sue the vaccine manufacturing companies. It was predicted that if this plan followed through, several companies in US and Britain could have been sued for an estimate of 40 million US dollars per year! After several forms of evidence had been found negating his proposition, he admitted to conveying false information. He was stripped of his license and his study has been retracted.
March 05, 2011 | 05:36 PM
Posted By:  Alan Cohen
What I find amazing is that somehow Jenny McCarthy has as much authority on this subject as NIH and CDC.
February 23, 2011 | 01:53 AM
Posted By:  Aurora Tormey
This is a really great post Leyla! I was very intrigued about how controversial the subject of the matter is. I also really like your analogy because it helped me better understand much of the misleading information about autism out there. I completely agree with you on the matter too. There is no concrete scientific evidence that concludes the idea that by getting your child vaccinated it will or will not lead to autism.
In my own opinion, if I was a parent I would definitely have my child vaccinated. I also believe Emily makes a good point. The parents who support Wakefield's research are looking for an explanation to why their child has autism. I really wanna hear people's different opinions and find out if further research will be conducted concerning this topic.
February 21, 2011 | 04:33 AM
Posted By:  Noa Lev-Ari
Sorry, the second source on my comment was supposed to be:
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/Index.html
February 21, 2011 | 04:32 AM
Posted By:  Noa Lev-Ari
Interesting post, Leyla! I did research on what the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) thought about the topic, and they don't believe vaccines are connected to autism. The IOM (Institution of Medicine) did scientific research and concluded there was no relationship between the vaccines and autism and that all the assumptions about them are completely "theoretical".

http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Immunization-Safety-Review-Vaccines-and-Autism.aspx
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Immunization-Safety-Review-Vaccines-and-Autism.aspx
February 18, 2011 | 06:42 PM
Posted By:  Emily D'Arco
Wow, Leyla, this was such an interesting post! To give you all my opinion on the matter, I believe that the theory that there is a link between vaccines and autism is a completely erroneous one. The results of Wakefield's study were proven to be wrong, and there is no reason why a parent should not have their child vaccinated. By doing so, the parent would be acting extremely selfishly, as the child is at a much higher risk for catching deadly diseases. Often, the parents who are advocating Wakefield's study and saying that he is still correct, are parents who have autistic children, and are looking for a reason as to why their child has autism. I respect the fact that parents with an autistic child want to know further information about the condition, and are satisfied by Wakefield's study, but I believe that it unfairly poses vaccines (that save millions of lives each year) in a negative light.
February 15, 2011 | 08:20 PM
Posted By:  Sara El-Hennawy
Amazing Post Ley! Eva I just want to correct you. JB Handley does not agree with this opinion whatsoever. If you watch the video in the post, JB Handley is interviewed and in this interview he discusses his view on this matter. JB Handley believes that the vaccine does cause Autism according to a "recent" study. The truth is that this study is false and the results were altered. I believe this is understandable because JB Handley's son has autism so it is a sensitive subject matter in his case. If you haven't seen the video I really reccomend you do.
February 15, 2011 | 12:35 AM
Posted By:  Nicholas Smarsch
Hey Leyla great post! I have a cousin who has autism, and i recently had a discussion with my aunt, and she told us that for any mother it is a difficult decision whether to vaccinate or take a risk. My aunt told us that she did not take part in the vaccination because she didn't think the chances where too high, even though autism was in our family tree. Briann, my cousin, ended up with autism, and sure she has trouble speaking, and her behaviors are different, she is still no different than anyone else.
February 15, 2011 | 12:26 AM
Posted By:  Eva Bartels
Great Post Leyla! I found what you wrote about to be really interesting! I never new that much about autism myself but this was really cool to read about. I thought that your opinion about the topic was really interesting, and I fully agree with you. There is no way to have a controlled experience to fully test whether or not you have autism because of the vaccines. I also find that it would but much more dangerous for people to hold back on the vaccines and raise their chances of getting the other diseases than autism. Apparently JB Handley also agrees with us. However, he was very harsh when describing his opinion in the article and going far enough to say that he believed that Wakefield purposely mislead all of his patients and his was the real cause of all the children catching all the other diseases when they didn't get the vaccination.This of course was the reason why Wakefield was stripped of his license. I would love to hear some other opinions on the matter!
Blogger Profiles

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs