Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Small renal masses

A positive surgical margin does not affect survival

The incidence and consequences of positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy are important issues in the management of localized renal cell carcinoma. A recent population-based study demonstrates a slightly higher rate of positive margins than previously reported in monocentric studies. However, margin status had no impact on overall or disease-specific survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Gill, I. S. et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol. 178, 41–46 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benway, B. M. et al. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. Eur. Urol. 57, 815–820 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kubinski, D. J., Clark, P. E., Assimos, D. G. & Hall, M. C. Utility of frozen section analysis of resection margins during partial nephrectomy. Urology 64, 31–34 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillyer, S. P. et al. Utility of intraoperative frozen section during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single institution experience. J. Endourol. 27, 324–327 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ani, I. et al. Prevalence and impact on survival of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. BJU Int. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j1464–1441DX201211675x.

  6. Abreu, A. L. et al. Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for single versus multiple renal tumors. J. Urol. 189, 462–467 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ljungberg, B. et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur. Urol. 58, 398–406 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ficarra, V., Novara, G. & Mottrie, A. Kidney cancer: zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy—further evaluations are needed. Nat. Rev. Urol. 8, 654–655 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Breda, A. et al. Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe. J. Urol. 178, 47–50 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tobis, S. et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging with robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience for renal cortical tumors. J. Urol. 186, 47–52 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens J. Rassweiler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rassweiler, J., Gözen, A. A positive surgical margin does not affect survival. Nat Rev Urol 10, 256–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.78

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2013.78

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer