Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Rectal cancer

Landmark study comparing surgical approaches for rectal cancer

Although numerous studies have reported the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, the results of large multicentre randomized controlled trials have been lacking. A study including 1,103 patients has now shown that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer can result in similar safety, resection margins and completeness of resection with improved recovery compared with laparotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. van der Pas, M. H. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 14, 210–218 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacy, A. M. et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg. Endosc. 9, 1101–1105 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 10, 44–52 (2009).

  4. Jayne, D. G. et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin. Oncol. 25, 3061–3068 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weeks, J. C. et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287, 321–328 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2050–2059 (2004).

  7. Steele, S. R., Brown, T. A., Rush, R. M. & Martin, M. J. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12, 583–591 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quirke, P. in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Optimisation, Standardisation, Documentation (eds Soreide, O. & Norstein, J.) 63–81 (Springer-Verlag, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Levack, M. et al. Laparoscopy decreases anastomotic leak rate in sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Arch. Surg. 146, 207–210 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Causey, M. W. et al. Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg. Endosc. 27, 603–609 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wexner, S. Landmark study comparing surgical approaches for rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 10, 263–264 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.61

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.61

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer