Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Super-resolution imaging of multiple cells by optimized flat-field epi-illumination

Abstract

Biological processes are inherently multi-scale, and supramolecular complexes at the nanoscale determine changes at the cellular scale and beyond. Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)1,2,3 techniques have been established as important tools for studying cellular features with resolutions of the order of around 10 nm. However, in their current form these modalities are limited by a highly constrained field of view (FOV) and field-dependent image resolution. Here, we develop a low-cost microlens array (MLA)-based epi-illumination system—flat illumination for field-independent imaging (FIFI)—that can efficiently and homogeneously perform simultaneous imaging of multiple cells with nanoscale resolution. The optical principle of FIFI, which is an extension of the Köhler integrator, is further elucidated and modelled with a new, free simulation package. We demonstrate FIFI's capabilities by imaging multiple COS-7 and bacteria cells in 100 × 100 μm2 SMLM images—more than quadrupling the size of a typical FOV and producing near-gigapixel-sized images of uniformly high quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Wide-field epi-illumination is not optimized for SMLM imaging of large FOVs.
Figure 2: Layout and design parameters for FIFI.
Figure 3: Simulated 1D sample plane irradiance profiles through the centre of the illuminated region demonstrate the strong dependence of the illumination homogeneity on the design parameters.
Figure 4: Uniform, large FOV STORM imaging of multiple eukaryotic cells or hundreds of bacterial cells in a single image.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793–795 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Betzig, E. et al. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313, 1642–1645 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hess, S. T., Girirajan, T. P. K. & Mason, M. D. Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. Biophys. J. 91, 4258–4272 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson, M. G. L. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. J. Microsc. 198, 82–87 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heintzmann, R. & Cremer, C. G. Laterally modulated excitation microscopy: improvement of resolution by using a diffraction grating. Proc. SPIE 3568, 185–196 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hell, S. W. & Wichmann, J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 19, 780–782 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwentker, M. A. et al. Wide-field subdiffraction RESOLFT microscopy using fluorescent protein photoswitching. Microsc. Res. Tech. 70, 269–280 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chmyrov, A. et al. Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ‘doughnuts’. Nat. Methods 10, 737–740 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieuwenhuizen, R. P. J. et al. Measuring image resolution in optical nanoscopy. Nat. Methods 10, 557–562 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heilemann, M. et al. Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 6172–6176 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgert, A., Letschert, S., Doose, S. & Sauer, M. Artifacts in single-molecule localization microscopy. Histochem. Cell Biol. 144, 123–131 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van de Linde, S. et al. Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy with standard fluorescent probes. Nat. Protoc. 6, 991–1009 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, F. et al. Video-rate nanoscopy using sCMOS camera-specific single-molecule localization algorithms. Nat. Methods 10, 653–658 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Völkel, R. & Weible, K. J. Laser beam homogenizing: limitations and constraints. Proc. SPIE 7102, 71020J–71020J-12 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Büttner, A. & Zeitner, U. D. Wave optical analysis of light-emitting diode beam shaping using microlens arrays. Opt. Eng. 41, 2393–2401 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, D. M., Dickey, F. M. & Weichman, L. S. in Laser Beam Shaping: Theory and Techniques (eds Dickey, F. M. & Holswade, S. C.) Ch. 7 (CRC Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streibl, N., Nölscher, U., Jahns, J. & Walker, S. Array generation with lenslet arrays. Appl. Opt. 30, 2739–2742 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scholtens, T. M. et al. Celltracks TDI: an image cytometer for cell characterization. Cytom. Pt A 79A, 203–213 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Model, M. A. & Blank, J. L. Concentrated dyes as a source of two-dimensional fluorescent field for characterization of a confocal microscope. J. Microsc. 229, 12–16 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, Y. et al. Quantifying and optimizing single-molecule switching nanoscopy at high speeds. PLoS ONE 10, e0128135 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schlimpert, S. et al. General protein diffusion barriers create compartments within bacterial cells. Cell 151, 1270–1282 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Almada, P., Culley, S. & Henriques, R. PALM and STORM: into large fields and high-throughput microscopy with sCMOS detectors. Methods 88, 109–121 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, Z.-L. et al. Localization-based super-resolution microscopy with an sCMOS camera. Opt. Express 19, 19156–19168 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bates, M., Dempsey, G. T., Chen, K. H. & Zhuang, X. Multicolor super-resolution fluorescence imaging via multi-parameter fluorophore detection. ChemPhysChem 13, 99–107 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkataramani, V., Herrmannsdörfer, F., Heilemann, M. & Kuner, T. Suresim: simulating localization microscopy experiments from ground truth models. Nat. Methods 13, 319–321 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ovesný, M., Křížek, P., Borkovec, J., Svindrych, Z. & Hagen, G. M. ThunderSTORM: a comprehensive ImageJ plug-in for PALM and STORM data analysis and super-resolution imaging. Bioinformatics 30, 2389–2390 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Voelz, D. G. Computational Fourier Optics: A MATLAB Tutorial (SPIE, 2011); http://spie.org/Publications/Book/858456.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao, X. & Voelz, D. Wave optics simulation approach for partial spatially coherent beams. Opt. Express 14, 6986–6992 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Edelstein, A. D. et al. Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Olivier, N., Keller, D., Gönczy, P. & Manley, S. Resolution doubling in 3D-STORM imaging through improved buffers. PLoS ONE 8, e69004 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank K. Bellvé for providing the pgFocus hardware, F. Huang for his help in troubleshooting the sCMOS localization software, D. G. Voelz for providing code examples for modelling partially coherent optical fields, R. Völkel for discussions about the Köhler integrator and N. Berliner, D. Ott, M. Weidman and P. Ramdya for useful discussions. Research in S.M.'s laboratory is supported by the National Centre of Competence in Research Chemical Biology and by the European Research Council (ERC 243016-PALMassembly). K.M.D. is supported by a SystemsX.ch Transition Postdoc Fellowship (2014/227).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.M. and K.M.D. conceived the idea. K.M.D. designed the epi-illumination system, built the microscope and wrote the simulation code. C.S. and A.L. performed the cell preparation and imaging. C.S. and A.A. assisted K.M.D. with building and testing the microscope. K.M.D. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kyle M. Douglass or Suliana Manley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 4064 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Douglass, K., Sieben, C., Archetti, A. et al. Super-resolution imaging of multiple cells by optimized flat-field epi-illumination. Nature Photon 10, 705–708 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.200

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.200

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing