Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Analysis
  • Published:

A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins

Abstract

Cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is increasingly used to map transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. We developed a method for CLIP data analysis, and applied it to compare CLIP with photoactivatable ribonucleoside–enhanced CLIP (PAR-CLIP) and to uncover how differences in cross-linking and ribonuclease digestion affect the identified sites. We found only small differences in accuracies of these methods in identifying binding sites of HuR, which binds low-complexity sequences, and Argonaute 2, which has a complex binding specificity. We found that cross-link–induced mutations led to single-nucleotide resolution for both PAR-CLIP and CLIP. Our results confirm the expectation from original CLIP publications that RNA-binding proteins do not protect their binding sites sufficiently under the denaturing conditions used during the CLIP procedure, and we show that extensive digestion with sequence-specific RNases strongly biases the recovered binding sites. This bias can be substantially reduced by milder nuclease digestion conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Relationship between the affinity and enrichment of HuR-binding sites obtained with different CLIP methods.
Figure 2: Location of the ten 7-mers with highest affinity for HuR relative to the most frequently cross-linked nucleotide in the binding site.
Figure 3: Predicted affinities of HuR binding sites isolated based on different measures.
Figure 4: Proportion of Ago2 binding sites matching the seed regions of the ten most abundantly expressed miRNA families.
Figure 5: Location and frequency of miRNA seed-complementary regions relative to the most frequently cross-linked nucleotide in the binding site.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Brown, V. et al. Microarray identification of FMRP-associated brain mRNAs and altered mRNA translational profiles in fragile X syndrome. Cell 107, 477–487 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eystathioy, T. et al. A phosphorylated cytoplasmic autoantigen, GW182, associates with a unique population of human mRNAs within novel cytoplasmic speckles. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1338–1351 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Landthaler, M. et al. Molecular characterization of human Argonaute-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes and their bound target mRNAs. RNA 14, 2580–2596 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mukherjee, N., Lager, P.J., Friedersdorf, M.B., Thompson, M.A. & Keene, J.D. Coordinated posttranscriptional mRNA population dynamics during T-cell activation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 288 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keene, J.D. & Tenenbaum, S.A. Eukaryotic mRNPs may represent posttranscriptional operons. Mol. Cell 9, 1161–1167 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhattacharyya, S.N., Habermacher, R., Martine, U., Closs, E.I. & Filipowicz, W. Relief of microRNA-mediated translational repression in human cells subjected to stress. Cell 125, 1111–1124 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kedde, M. et al. RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell 131, 1273–1286 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H.H. et al. HuR recruits let-7/RISC to repress c-Myc expression. Genes Dev. 23, 1743–1748 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kedde, M. et al. A Pumilio-induced RNA structure switch in p27–3′ UTR controls miR-221 and miR-222 accessibility. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 1014–1020 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ule, J. et al. CLIP identifies Nova-regulated RNA networks in the brain. Science 302, 1212–1215 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Licatalosi, D.D. et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 456, 464–469 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hafner, M. et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 141, 129–141 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Konig, J. et al. iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 909–915 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Atasoy, U., Watson, J., Patel, D. & Keene, J.D. ELAV protein HuA (HuR) can redistribute between nucleus and cytoplasm and is upregulated during serum stimulation and T cell activation. J. Cell Sci. 111, 3145–3156 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray, D. et al. Rapid and systematic analysis of the RNA recognition specificities of RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 667–670 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ender, C. & Meister, G. Argonaute proteins at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1819–1823 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ule, J., Jensen, K., Mele, A. & Darnell, R.B. CLIP: a method for identifying protein-RNA interaction sites in living cells. Methods 37, 376–386 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chi, S.W., Zang, J.B., Mele, A. & Darnell, R.B. Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA-mRNA interaction maps. Nature 460, 479–486 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Z., Tollervey, J., Briese, M., Turner, D. & Ule, J. CLIP: construction of cDNA libraries for high-throughput sequencing from RNAs cross-linked to proteins in vivo. Methods 48, 287–293 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zisoulis, D.G. et al. Comprehensive discovery of endogenous Argonaute binding sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 173–179 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi, K., Uchida, T. & Egami, F. Ribonuclease T1, structure and function. Adv. Biophys. 1, 53–98 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dingwall, C., Lomonossoff, G.P. & Laskey, R.A. High sequence specificity of micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 2659–2673 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Granneman, S., Kudla, G., Petfalski, E. & Tollervey, D. Identification of protein binding sites on U3 snoRNA and pre-rRNA by UV cross-linking and high-throughput analysis of cDNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9613–9618 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, X. & Tanaka Hall, T.M. Structural basis for recognition of AU-rich element RNA by the HuD protein. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 141–145 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khorshid, M., Rodak, C. & Zavolan, M. CLIPZ: a database and analysis environment for experimentally determined binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D245–D252 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Levine, T.D., Gao, F., King, P.H., Andrews, L.G. & Keene, J.D. Hel-N1: an autoimmune RNA-binding protein with specificity for 3′ uridylate-rich untranslated regions of growth factor mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3494–3504 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan, X.C. & Steitz, J.A. Overexpression of HuR, a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein, increases the in vivo stability of ARE-containing mRNAs. EMBO J. 17, 3448–3460 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, B.P., Burge, C.B. & Bartel, D.P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120, 15–20 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, K.C. & Meun, D.H. Kinetics of the photochemical addition of [35S] cysteine to polynucleotides and nucleic acids. Biochemistry 7, 1033–1037 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hockensmith, J.W., Kubasek, W.L., Vorachek, W.R. & von Hippel, P.H. Laser cross-linking of nucleic acids to proteins. Methodology and first applications to the phage T4 DNA replication system. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 3512–3518 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rudel, S., Flatley, A., Weinmann, L., Kremmer, E. & Meister, G. A multifunctional human Argonaute2-specific monoclonal antibody. RNA 14, 1244–1253 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Krol, J. et al. Characterizing light-regulated retinal microRNAs reveals rapid turnover as a common property of neuronal microRNAs. Cell 141, 618–631 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Berninger, P., Gaidatzis, D., van Nimwegen, E. & Zavolan, M. Computational analysis of small RNA cloning data. Methods 44, 13–21 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fraley, C. & Raftery, A.E. Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 9, 611–631 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smyth, G.K. Limma: linear models for microarray data. in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor (eds., Gentleman, R., Carey, V., Dudoit, S., Irizarry, R. & Huber, W.) 397–420 (Springer, New York, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Meister (University of Regensburg) for Ago2 antibody, C. Rammelt for initial help with PAR-CLIP, I. Nissen and C. Beisel for support with deep sequencing, J. Krol for help with miRNA quantification, B. Dimitriades for help with cell culture, and W. Keller and W. Filipowicz for critical comments and suggestions. We also thank the members of the Zavolan laboratory for valuable discussions. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (#31003A_127307, PDAM_3_127218 and PDFMP3_123123), the Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology (Cell Plasticity) and the Swiss Cancer League (#KFS 02477-08-2009) and by the European Molecular Biology Organization long-term fellowship 184-2009 to S.K.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.K. designed and performed the experiments, L.J. designed and performed the experiments and wrote the paper, L.B. analyzed the data, J.H. analyzed the data, M.K. developed the annotation tools and analyzed the data and M.Z. designed and supervised the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaela Zavolan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–14 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 10786 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kishore, S., Jaskiewicz, L., Burger, L. et al. A quantitative analysis of CLIP methods for identifying binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Nat Methods 8, 559–564 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1608

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1608

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing