Nature | News

Fukushima data show rise and fall in food radioactivity

Giant database captures fluctuating radioactivity levels in vegetables, fruit, meat and tea.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Natsuki Sakai/AFLO/Alamy

Fresh farm produce on sale in Koriyama, 200 km northeast of Tokyo, in February 2013.

A massive food-monitoring programme in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster has provided scientists with a unique look at how radioactivity peaks in different foods after a nuclear spill.

Almost four years since the incident, the first analysis of the data also confirms what multiple studies of Fukushima residents have already shown: few people are likely to have eaten food that exceeded strict Japanese limits on radioactive contamination.

On 11 March 2011, a massive offshore earthquake triggered a tsunami that swamped the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. Plumes of gas from the reactor released radioactive isotopes into the local area, which were transported farther afield by wind and rain, before falling onto plants and seeping into soil. 

The Japanese government banned products that were likely to have been affected, including leafy vegetables, which can absorb radioactive elements through their leaves, and milk from animals that had been feeding on local grass.

The government also instigated an extensive monitoring campaign, sampling foods before they hit the market for levels of radioactive elements such as caesium-137, and banning producers or areas that exceeded regulatory limits.

Little contamination

The safety effort has been commended for being very effective. It also produced a vast database. Stefan Merz, an environmental scientist at the Vienna University of Technology in Austria, and his colleagues have now analysed the database of almost 900,000 samples collected between 2011 and 2014, and publish their results in Environmental Science and Technology1.

The researchers found that during the first year after the accident, 3.3% of food from the Fukushima region had above-limit contamination — these products were then prevented from reaching the market. It rose slightly the following year but by 2014, the proportion had fallen to 0.6%. For Japan more widely, the figures were 0.9% falling to 0.2%, says co-author Georg Steinhauser, an environmental scientist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins. Combined with the fact that people need to eat huge amounts of above-limit food to exceed the annual permitted radiation dose, the chance of anyone exceeding it was very low, he says.

That conclusion fits with several studies, including one done in 20132 that showed that only members of the public who bypassed the monitoring by eating home-grown food — four older residents — showed any elevated radiation levels, and these soon returned to normal when eating food that had been regulated.

But the analysis also details how radiation levels rose and then fell in various foods in the wake of the disaster (see 'Fukushima food'), to reveal information about how Japan’s ecology and diet differ from those elsewhere.

Of mushrooms and boar

From Chernobyl and weapons-testing sites in the twentieth century, scientists already knew that mushrooms, which soak up radioactive elements from the soil, have a tendency to accumulate more radionuclides than most other vegetables.

The data from Fukushima show that the radioactivity levels fell quickly in most vegetables: just five months after the disaster, only a handful of samples exceeded the limit. They also showed two peaks for mushrooms, one for fresh mushrooms and the other for dried mushrooms. Tea leaves showed a late spike — they were harvested later than other leafy plants, but retained some radioactivity because older leaves transferred the radioactive elements to younger leaves, says Steinhauser.

Meat products also exceeded limits only later, because animals mainly incorporate radioactive elements by eating contaminated plants. The authors found that boars, which feed on mushrooms, were particular accumulators.

Solidarity supermarkets

Even though the radioactivity in Fukushima's food has now returned to pre-accident levels, consumption has not yet recovered, says Jun Furukawa, an environmental scientist at the Center for Research in Isotopes and Environmental Dynamics at the University of Tsukuba in Japan.

As a result, ‘solidarity supermarkets’ have sprung up that only sell Fukushima produce, and the Fukko Shien Sakaba restaurant in Tokyo reportedly specializes in food from the area and donates profits to affected regions.

To help lift the stigma, Steinhauser carried out his own experiment last summer. After six weeks in the region eating only local produce, drinking only tap water and maximizing his intake of the foods that tend to accumulate the highest volumes of radioactive elements, a scan revealed no traces of radioactivity in his body. “I was convinced that the radioactivity levels in my body would be very low, but I was surprised that no artificial radioactivity was detectable at all,” he says.

Geraldine Thomas, a molecular pathologist at Imperial College London, describes Japan’s handling of food in the wake of the crisis as excellent and says that Steinhauser's experience was what you would expect. “He would have had more of a dose on the plane going over there than he would have done from eating the food.”

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17016

References

  1. Merz, S., Shozugawa, K. & Steinhauser, G. Environ. Sci. Technol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es5057648 (2015)

  2. Hayano, R. S. et al. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. B 89, 157163 (2013).

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

3 comments Subscribe to comments

  1. Avatar for Ms. Dee
    Ms. Dee
    This article reads like a puff piece for the nuclear industry, imho. Your readers should instead read ---> "Nuclear radiation: there is no safe dose" http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/insights/04/01/11/nuclear-radiation-there-no-safe-dose And everyone should review this study showing the detrimental health effects of Chernobyl radiation. Since Fukushima is now said to be worse than Chernobyl, this document is important to show what health effects could be coming for Japan ---> http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/chernob_report_2011_en_web.pdf And here is an excellent compilation of radiation amounts found in food: http://www.enviroreporter.com/2013/02/radiation-food-lab/29/ And finally, www.enenews.com is highly recommended viewing every morning to stay current on the Fukushima nuclear crisis.
  2. Avatar for Peter MetaSkeptic
    Peter MetaSkeptic
    You have no respect for science. From argumentum ad hominem to casting doubts as a main tool of your argumentation, you simply don't care about what is right or not. It's a waste of time to argue with people like you because, you respect only your own rules, which have nothing to do with reality. None of you can give us names of inhabitants who have died from radioactivity in Fukushima. But what you struggle to understand is, that even if there is a list, would you have the honesty to produce the name of people who died from carbon-based fuels during 2014? Take your time, people around here, who want to cooperate and are educated knows how large that list is. For those interested to understand what good thinking habits are: http://www.metaskeptic.net/metaskeptic-resources.html
  3. Avatar for SA Kiteman
    SA Kiteman
    Ms. Dee, But there is a safe dose. Indeed, there may be a healthful dose. It is called the hormesis effect. Check out: http://dose-response.org http://www.belleonline.com/newsletters.htm ENE(thing but rational)News can hardly be a source to stay current. As a joke site, maybe.
sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.