Abstract
The recent research on multiferroics has provided solid evidence that the breaking of inversion symmetry by spin order can induce ferroelectric polarization P. This type of multiferroics, called spin-driven ferroelectrics, often show a gigantic change in P on application of a magnetic field B. However, their polarization (<~0.1 μC cm−2) is much smaller than that in conventional ferroelectrics (typically several to several tens of μC cm−2). Here we show that the application of external pressure to a representative spin-driven ferroelectric, TbMnO3, causes a flop of P and leads to the highest P (≈1.0 μC cm−2) among spin-driven ferroelectrics ever reported. We explain this behaviour in terms of a pressure-induced magnetoelectric phase transition, based on the results of density functional simulations. In the high-pressure phase, the application of B further enhances P over 1.8 μC cm−2. This value is nearly an order of magnitude larger than those ever reported in spin-driven ferroelectrics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
TbMnO3, an orthorhombically distorted perovskite manganite (RMnO3 where R=trivalent rare-earth) with the Pbnm space group, is one of the most studied spin-driven ferroelectrics1,2,3. In this compound, its ferroelectric polarization P is induced along the c axis by the inversion-symmetry breaking due to a cycloidal spiral spin order4 (Fig. 1a) through the antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction5,6. Since the interaction originates from relativistic spin–orbit coupling (SOC), the induced P (0.07~0.08 μC cm−2)1 is much smaller than that in conventional displacive ferroelectrics such as BaTiO3. The cycloidal spiral spin order in TbMnO3 is characterized by a propagation vector (0,k,1) where k≈0.28 and results from the competition between ferromagnetic (FM) in-plane nearest (J1) and antiferromagnetic in-plane next-nearest-neighbour (J2) interactions of Mn moments7. This competition and, in turn, the resulting spin-ordered state, are modified by replacing Tb with other rare-earth ions8. By substituting smaller ions such as Ho and Y (that is, applying chemical pressure), the Mn–O–Mn bond angles decrease9, leading to the enhancement of J2/J1 (ref. 7). As a result, the ground state changes into a collinear up-up-down-down (↑↑↓↓) spin structure, the so-called ‘E-type’ antiferromagnetic (E-AFM) structure10, shown in Fig. 1b. Both model Hamiltonian11 and first-principles12 calculations predicted another type of spin-driven mechanisms for polarization: ferroelectricity in the E-AFM phase is ascribed to nonrelativistic symmetric exchange striction, which causes substantial atomic displacements (orange arrows Fig. 1b) and induces relatively large P (~6 μC cm−2) along the a axis. In fact, P observed experimentally in E-AFM RMnO3 (for example, ~0.15 μC cm−2 in polycrystalline TmMnO3 (ref. 13), ~0.17 μC cm−2 in polycrystalline LuMnO3 (ref. 14) and ~0.24 μC cm−2 in a single crystal of YMnO3 (ref. 15)) is larger than that in spin-spiral TbMnO3. However, the P-value appears one order of magnitude smaller than that predicted theoretically11,12.
The application of physical pressure, leading to structural modifications such as shortening of interatomic distance can be another tool to tune the magnetic competition, spin state and resulting spin-driven ferroelectricity16. In fact, a powder neutron diffraction study under high pressures on TbMnO3 indicates that the spiral spin-ordered state transforms into the E-AFM phase at around 3.6 GPa (ref. 17). Though there are few works18 focused on the effects of applied pressure on spin-driven ferroelectricity in TbMnO3, these studies have been carried out only up to 1~2 GPa and have never reported drastic changes in the ground state, (such as a pressure-induced ferroelectric phase transition). In this study, we investigated the effects of high pressure—up to 8.7 GPa—on the ferroelectric properties in TbMnO3, and discovered a pressure-induced magnetoelectric phase transition and the largest ferroelectric polarization among known spin-driven ferroelectrics.
Results
Pressure versus temperature phase diagram
Figures 1c–e show temperature T profiles of heat capacity (Cac), relative dielectric constant along the c axis (εc) and along the a axis (εa), respectively, at several pressures. The data of the dielectric constant are normalized by data at 60 K. At 0.8 GPa, the T dependence of Cac exhibits three distinct anomalies at around 40 K, 27 K and 7 K, which correspond to the Néel temperature of Mn moments (), the ferroelectric transition temperature (TC) and the Néel temperature of Tb moments ), respectively. As the applied pressure increases, all of the three anomalies monotonically shift toward higher temperatures. Above 4~5 GPa, the anomaly at TC almost vanishes (see also the phase diagram displayed in Fig. 1f). Corresponding to this suppression of the heat capacity anomaly at TC, a distinct peak feature observed at TC in εc is also suppressed above around 5 GPa (see Fig. 1d). This suggests that ferroelectricity along the c axis disappears above around 5 GPa. By contrast, the application of pressure above around 4.5 GPa induces a striking peak feature accompanying a thermal hysteresis in the T dependence of εa, as shown in Fig. 1e. In the 5.2-GPa data, the most enhanced peak feature can be seen at around 20 K, at which the maximum value of εa reaches around 150. The peak structure in εa−T curves at high pressure reminds us of a ferroelectric phase transition.
Pressure effect on P–E curve
Figure 2 shows P–E curves collected with applying an electric field (E) along the c and a axes at selected pressures. In the data at low pressures (Fig. 2a,b), at which a peak feature was observed in εc−T curves, a clear hysteresis loop was observed only in the P//c configuration. This means that the system is ferroelectric with a spontaneous polarization (Ps) along the c axis. The Ps of 0.07 μC cm−2 and the coercive field of 70 kV cm−1 observed at 10 K and 2.7 GPa (Fig. 2a) are nearly the same with those collected at ambient pressure1. (The slope of the P–E curves, which is related to the magnitude of the dielectric constant, looks large. This is due to the smallness of Ps in the spin spiral. If Ps were larger, the slope of Ps would be less represented). By contrast, in the data at 5.2 GPa (Fig. 2c,d), at which εa−T curves exhibit a distinct peak structure, no substantial hysteresis loop was observed in the P//c configuration, while that of P//a shows a gigantic hysteresis loop characteristic of ferroelectric along the a axis. The results shown in Figs 1 and 2 demonstrate that TbMnO3 exhibits a pressure-induced polarization-flop transition, where the ferroelectric polarization vector is switched from pointing along the c to the a axis by the application of pressure at around 4.5 GPa. These experimental results on the pressure dependence of the ferroelectric properties are summarized in the phase diagram shown in Fig. 1f.
The most remarkable result of the abovementioned pressure effect is a gigantic magnitude of Ps observed in the high-pressure P//a phase. More detailed pressure effects on P–E curves in the high-pressure phase are displayed in Fig. 3a. It is evident that TC, Ps and the coercive field tend to increase with increasing pressure from 4.6 GPa to 8.7 GPa. At 5 K, Ps reaches a maximum (≈1.0 μC cm−2) at 5.2 GPa and turns to be suppressed above 5.2 GPa. The observed Ps is larger by an order of magnitude than that in the low-pressure P//c phase and exceeds the highest values ever reported in spin-driven ferroelectrics (c.f., 0.29 μC cm−2 in CaMn7O12 (ref. 19) and 0.36 μC cm−2 in GdMn2O5 (ref. 20)).
Density functional theory—pressure-induced phase transition
To understand the microscopic origin of the polarization enhancement occurring under pressure, we performed simulations based on first-principles density functional theory (DFT) for different spin configurations (see Methods). Figure 4a shows the magnetic stability as a function of applied pressure: the cycloid spin structure (with k=1/3) is the magnetic ground state at ambient pressure, whereas the E-AFM becomes the ground state under high pressure (>3.5 GPa). This is consistent with a previous neutron diffraction result on TbMnO3 (ref. 17). In turn, the magnetic transition from the cycloid to the E-AFM phase can qualitatively explain the observed pressure-induced polarization flop transition and the enhancement of Ps in the high-pressure phase. The calculated E-AFM-driven ferroelectric polarization along the a axis monotonically increases with increasing pressure (Ps=6.0 μC cm−2 at 0 GPa and Ps=8.0 μC cm−2 at 10 GPa (see Supplementary Note 1)), being two orders of magnitude larger than the spiral-spin-induced polarization at 0 GPa (~0.05 μC cm−2 along the c axis21). This increase is due to the enhancement of Mn-eg electron hopping under pressure (consistent with the bandwidth of occupied eg electronic states increasing from 0.62 to 0.75 eV), related to the so-called ‘asymmetric hopping’ at the basis of the microscopic origin of ferroelectricity22. The increase in Ps with increasing pressure is inconsistent with the aforementioned experimental results in which Ps turns to decrease above 5.2 GPa. One possible explanation for the discrepancy is ascribed to the enhancement of the coercive field with increasing pressure. If that is the case, larger E is needed to fully switch ferroelectric domains, and actual Ps at high pressure is larger than that obtained from the data of Fig. 3a.
The stabilization of the E-AFM phase can be understood in terms of the enhancement of both J1 and J2 under pressure, with the general trend |J2|>|J1| (see Fig. 4b). Our result, J1=−2.7 meV and J2=4.15 meV at 0 GPa, is consistent with the J-values estimated from neutron scattering23, which provides J1=−2.4 meV (their reported value JFM=0.15 meV doesn’t include the spin moment S=4 μB, so J1=JFMS2 should be compared with our results) and the ratio J2/J1=−0.8. The enhancement of J1 with increasing pressure can be reasonably explained by the increase of Mn–O–Mn bond angles (145.0° at 0 GPa and 145.8° at 10 GPa in the optimized cell), while that of J2 is related to structural changes in Mn(1)–O(2)–O(3)–Mn(4) (longer-ranged) interaction paths (see Fig. 1a and Supplementary Note 2). In the optimized cell, the O(2)–O(3) bond length d23 is shortened by pressure (3.075 Å at 0 GPa to 3.040 Å at 10 GPa), as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. As a result, under pressure the strongly enhanced J2 (antiparallel spin coupling) and slightly weaker J1 (parallel spin coupling) stabilize the ↑↑↓↓ E-AFM spin configuration. In RMnO3, it is well known that the lattice contraction by chemical pressure, that is, substitution of R site with smaller rare-earth, mainly causes the decrease of the Mn–O–Mn bond angles9. In contrast, the application of physical pressure shortens Mn–O bond lengths but increases the Mn–O–Mn bond angles24, so that both J1 and J2 are enhanced, therefore making the E-AFM spin configuration unusually stable in TbMnO3 under pressure.
Since the enhancement of J1 and J2 is simply ascribed to the enhancement of the Mn-eg electron hopping between the nearest-neighbour and the next-nearest-neighbour Mn sites, it is fair to say that the characteristic lattice deformation caused by applying pressure leads to large ferroelectric polarization in the high-pressure phase. In this context, high pressure is needed to obtain larger ferroelectric polarization from E-AFM RMnO3. However, we don’t deny the possibility that such lattice deformation is realized at ambient pressure by special synthesis techniques such as high-pressure synthesis and epitaxial thin-film growth.
Effect of biquadratic spin–phonon interaction
Another ingredient favouring the collinear E-AFM configuration is the biquadratic spin–phonon interaction (see Methods). As shown in Fig. 4c, we simultaneously rotated half of the Mn spins from ↑→↓← (90° spiral) to ↑↑↓↓ E-AFM configuration25. Along this spin rotation path, the exchange interaction Jij(Si˙ Sj) doesn’t contribute to the energy lowering, the latter being then exclusively due to the spin–phonon interaction −Bbiq(Si˙Sj)2 (refs 26, 27). Indeed, Bbiq is also enhanced from 2.2 meV f.u.−1 (at 0 GPa) to 3.2 meV f.u.−1 (at 10 GPa), therefore contributing to the stabilization of the collinear E-AFM phase under pressure. Both the preference for the E-AFM configuration and the polar ionic distortion originate from the same root, namely, the asymmetric hopping mechanism. Under pressure, the enhanced eg electron hopping also increases spin–phonon interaction. By aligning the spins in the ↑↑↓↓ configuration, a spin-Peierls-like mechanism makes Mn ions to dimerize, in order to increase hopping between the same spin sites and decrease hopping between opposite spin sites, therefore reducing the kinetic energy. At the same time, exchange striction becomes active in the symmetry-lowered spin configuration, which displaces O ions between Mn ions in the polar distortion mode. This plays a key role in the lattice-induced contribution to polarization in E-AFM.
Effect of magnetic fields on ferroelectricity under high pressure
Next we investigated the effect of a magnetic field B applied along a on the giant spin-driven P in the high-pressure P//a phase. In Fig. 3a–c, we plot P–E curves measured at various T, B and pressures above 4.6 GPa. These P−E hysteresis loops clearly show that the ferroelectric polarization in the high-pressure P//a phase is strongly affected by B. From these data, the T profiles of Ps at the respective B and pressures are summarized in Fig. 3d, in which one can find that the maximum of Ps reaches 1.8 μC cm−2 at 5 K, 8 T and 5.2 GPa. This value for a spin-driven ferroelectric is nearly of the same order of magnitude as that of conventional ferroelectrics (for example, ~4 μC cm−2 in triglycine sulphate, (NH2CH2COOH)3·H2SO4 (ref. 28) and ~20 μC cm−2 in barium titanate, BaTiO3 (ref. 29)).
To further elucidate the B effect on P in the high-pressure phase, we investigated magnetodielectric and magnetoelectric effects at 7.1 GPa. Figure 5a displays εa−T curves at 7.1 GPa in the presence of selected magnetic fields. These εa−T curves with a distinct thermal hysteresis can be characterized by three anomalies: a steep increase of εa toward low T at 45~50 K (indicated by open circle), a peak structure at 25~30 K (open square) and a small shoulder at around 10 K (open diamond). Taking account of the results at ambient pressure1, these anomalies probably represent magnetic (and ferroelectric) transition points. The peak structure related to the ferroelectric transition slightly shifts toward higher T with increasing B. It should be also noted that the small shoulder disappears by applying B above 2~3 T and the magnitude of εa at the lowest T is considerably suppressed. Figure 5b displays a direct magnetoelectric effect, that is, a change in P by sweeping B, at 5 K and 7.1 GPa. At around |B|=2~3 T, the magnitude of P increases rapidly from 0.8 to 1.3 μCcm−2. As shown in Fig. 5b, the B-induced change in P persists in both B-increasing and B-decreasing runs, and reaches 0.5 μC cm−2 which is comparable with the highest value ever observed in spin-driven ferroelectrics (for example, 0.5 μC cm−2 in GdMn2O5 (ref. 20)).
Discussion
The magnetoelectric effect observed in the high-pressure P//a phase is arranged in Fig. 5c as a T versus B phase diagram stacked with the contour plot of the magnitude of P. As seen in the phase diagram, there are two distinct ferroelectric phases with different magnitude of ferroelectric polarization (separated by the phase boundary marked by diamond symbols). At the lowest T, P is steeply enhanced by applying B above ~2 T. In the case of the ambient-pressure condition, it is known that the application of B along the a axis causes a flop of P from the P//c phase with the bc cycloid to the P//a phase with the ab cycloid30,31. That is, the application of B along a stabilizes the P//a phase at ambient pressure. In terms of the stabilization of P//a state, the high-pressure phase exhibits a similar tendency. The P flop observed at ambient pressure is interpreted as a result of reduced Tb–Mn exchange interaction when Tb moments become aligned ferromagnetically by applying B32. Because of a lack of information about magnetism in the high-B phase under high pressure, we cannot confirm the origin of the presently observed enhancement of P above ~2 T at this stage. However, taking account of the results at ambient pressure, it is natural to speculate that B-induced change in the ordered state of Tb moments contributes to the observed enhancement of P by applying B through the Tb–Mn symmetric exchange striction. However, to clarify the origin of the B-enhanced P observed in the high-pressure phase in more detail, we will need more information about magnetic properties which can be obtained from in-field magnetization and neutron-scattering measurements under high pressure. Though the detailed mechanism is still an open question, the drastic change in P by applying B confirms that the observed gigantic ferroelectric polarization is ascribed to a spin-driven origin.
To conclude, we carried out dielectric measurements on TbMnO3 under high pressure, and found the pressure-induced magnetoelectric phase transition and the largest ferroelectric polarization among spin-driven ferroelectrics ever reported. These results were qualitatively explained by the density functional simulations. Our study demonstrated that it is possible to attain gigantic spin-driven ferroelectric polarization which is nearly of the same order of magnitude as that in conventional ferroelectrics, and to control it magnetically. Another aspect for the present finding is that the application of high pressure can be an effective perturbation to achieve high-performance multiferroics.
Methods
Experimental procedure
A single crystal of TbMnO3 was grown by the floating zone method. The crystal was cut into thin plates (typical dimensions, ≈150 × 150 × 25 μm3) with the widest surfaces perpendicular to the a or c axis (in the Pbnm notation). Heat capacity obtained by ac-calorimetry (Cac), relative dielectric constant (ε) and electric polarization (P) were measured at various pressures by using a diamond anvil cell (DAC) made of Cu–Be alloy. For the measurements of ε and P, an electric field (E) was applied along the a or c axis. Glycerine was used as a pressure-transmitting medium, which remains liquid up to around 5 GPa at room temperature. Pressure was applied at room temperature and determined at room temperature and 10 K for the respective measurements by the ruby fluorescence method. The DAC was introduced into a superconducting magnet which allows the control of temperature (T) and the application of a magnetic field (B). A lock-in amplifier and an LCR meter (L: inductance, C: capacitance, R: resistance) were used for the measurements of Cac and ε, respectively. More details of the experimental techniques have been reported in refs 33 and 34. To obtain the E (B) dependence of P, displacement current was measured with an electrometer while sweeping E at a rate of 60 kV cm−1 min−1 (sweeping B at a rate of 1 T min−1). These current measurements were performed after poling the crystals at 70~100 kV cm−1 while cooling from 60 K to measurement temperature. By integrating the displacement current as a function of time, P was obtained. All the P data shown in this paper were taken during the cooling procedure. Measurements of ε and P in applied B were done in the configuration with B parallel to E.
Density functional simulations
Density functional simulations were performed using the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package35, within the generalized gradient approximation36 to the exchange correlation potential. We note that the use of GGA+U potential worsens the results, leading to an A-type antiferromagnetic (A-AFM) ground state in the whole pressure range (the worse DFT+U results for manganites have been discussed at length in ref. 25). We followed a procedure similar to ref. 22. First, we optimized internal atomic parameters imposing the A-AFM spin configuration, whereas we took the experimental lattice parameters under pressure from ref. 24 (note that measurements have been done at room temperature). We also extracted additional sets of lattice parameters by linearly interpolating experimental values. By using this optimized cell, we compared total energies of several magnetic configurations, that is, A-, C-, G-, E-, E*-AFM in a × 2b × c orthorhombic Pbnm supercell and cycloidal-spin structure (with k=1/3 spiral in the bc plane) in a × 3b × c supercell, with reference to FM in respective supercells. Here, A-, C-, G- and E-AFM denote spin configurations in the standard Wollan–Koehler notation37, while E*-AFM represents the spin configuration showing the same in-plane spin arrangement as E-AFM but with an interplanar FM coupling22. The cutoff energy for plane waves was set at 500 eV, whereas the k-point sampling was done using the 4 × 2 × 3 and 4 × 1 × 3 Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid, respectively. The numerical error caused by using a different size for the supercells was evaluated by comparing energy differences between A-AFM and FM, calculated in the two supercells: the numerical error was less than 2 meV f.u.−1. As a second step, in order to discuss ferroelectric properties, the internal atomic structure was further optimized within the E-AFM spin configuration, leading to ferroelectric polarization induced by exchange striction, as discussed in E-AFM HoMnO3 (ref. 12). We note that SOC doesn’t significantly change the magnetic stability. Ferroelectric polarization was calculated by using the Berry phase method.
The calculated magnetic energy was mapped to the following Hamiltonian,
The first term is the conventional Heisenberg exchange term, while the second term represents the biquadratic spin interaction related to spin–phonon coupling; the latter tends to favour a collinear spin alignment, therefore stabilizing the E-AFM order with respect to cycloidal orders26,38. In the Hamiltonian, the spin moment was normalized to 1. In order to disentangle the role of SOC, we performed DFT simulations with and without SOC; since the energy ordering of different phases did not change and the whole-phase diagram was only marginally affected, in our Hamiltonian we neglected any term related to SOC (such as single-ion anisotropy, Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya terms and so on).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Aoyama, T. et al. Giant spin-driven ferroelectric polarization in TbMnO3 under high pressure. Nat. Commun. 5:4927 doi: 10.1038/ncomms5927 (2014).
References
Kimura, T. et al. Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization. Nature 426, 55–58 (2003).
Cheong, S.-W. & Mostovoy, M. V. Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nat. Mater. 6, 13–20 (2007).
Arima, T. Spin-driven ferroelectricity and magneto-electric effects in frustrated magnetic systems. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 052001 (2011).
Kenzelmann, M. et al. Magnetic inversion symmetry breaking and ferroelectricity in TbMnO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087206 (2005).
Katsura, H., Nagaosa, N. & Balatsky, A. V. Spin current and magnetoelectric effect in noncollinear magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
Sergienko, I. A. & Dagotto, E. Role of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in multiferroic perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094434 (2006).
Kimura, T. et al. Distorted perovskite with e g1 configuration as a frustrated spin system. Phys. Rev. B 68, 060403(R) (2003).
Mochizuki, M., Furukawa, N. & Nagaosa, N. Spin model of magnetostrictions in multiferroic Mn perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037205 (2010).
Alonso, J. A., Martínez-Lope, M. J., Casais, M. T. & Fernández-Díaz, M. T. Evolution of the Jahn−Teller distortion of MnO6 octahedra in RMnO3 perovskites (R=Pr, Nd, Dy, Tb, Ho, Er, Y): a neutron diffraction study. Inorg. Chem. 39, 917–923 (2000).
Muňoz, A. et al. Complex magnetism and magnetic structures of the metastable HoMnO3 perovskite. Inorg. Chem. 40, 1020–1028 (2001).
Sergienko, I. A., Sen, C. & Dagotto, E. Ferroelectricity in the Magnetic E-phase of orthorhombic perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 227204 (2006).
Picozzi, S., Yamauchi, K., Sanyal, B., Sergienko, I. & Dagotto, E. Dual nature of improper ferroelectricity in a magnetoelectric multiferroic. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 227201 (2007).
Pomjakushin, V. Yu. et al. Evidence for large electric polarization from collinear magnetism in TmMnO3 . N. J. Phys. 11, 043019 (2009).
Chai, Y. S. et al. Intrinsic ferroelectric polarization of orthorhombic manganites with E-type spin order. Phys. Rev. B 85, 184406 (2012).
Okuyama, D. et al. Magnetically driven ferroelectric atomic displacements in orthorhombic YMnO3 . Phys. Rev. B 84, 054440 (2011).
Rocquefelte, X., Schwarz, K., Blaha, P., Kumar, S. & van den Brink, J. Room-temperature spin-spiral multiferroicity in high-pressure cupric oxide. Nat. Commun. 4, 2511 (2013).
Makarova, O. L., Mirebeau, I., Kichanov, S. E., Rodriguez-Carvaja, J. & Forget, A. Pressure-induced change in the magnetic ordering of TbMnO3 . Phys. Rev. B 84, 020408(R) (2011).
Noda, K., Nakamura, S., Nagayama, J. & Kuwahara, H. Magnetic field and external-pressure effect on ferroelectricity in manganites: comparison between GdMnO3 and TbMnO3 . J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10C103 (2005).
Johnson, R. D. et al. Giant improper ferroelectricity in the ferroaxial magnet CaMn7O12 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067201 (2012).
Lee, N. et al. Giant tunability of ferroelectric polarization in GdMn2O5 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 137203 (2013).
Malashevich, A. & Vanderbilt, D. First principles study of improper ferroelectricity in TbMnO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 037210 (2008).
Yamauchi, K., Freimuth, K., Blügel, S. & Picozzi, S. Magnetically induced ferroelectricity in orthorhombic manganites: microscopic origin and chemical trends. Phys. Rev. B 78, 014403 (2008).
Senff, D. et al. Magnetic excitations in multiferroic TbMnO3: evidence for a hybridized soft mode. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 137206 (2007).
Chen, J. M. Pressure-induced structural distortion of TbMnO3: a combined X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Phys. Rev. B 79, 165110 (2009).
Picozzi, S., Yamauchi, K., Bihlmayer, G. & Blugel, S. First-principles stabilization of an unconventional collinear magnetic ordering in distorted manganites. Phys. Rev. B 74, 094402 (2006).
Kaplan, T. A. Frustrated classical Heisenberg model in one dimension with nearest-neighbor biquadratic exchange: exact solution for the ground-state phase diagram. Phys. Rev. B 80, 012407 (2009).
Hayden, L. X., Kaplan, T. A. & Mahanti, S. D. Frustrated classical Heisenberg and XY models in two dimensions with nearest-neighbor biquadratic exchange: exact solution for the ground-state phase diagram. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 047203 (2010).
Chynoweth, A. G. Pyroelectricity, internal domains, and interface charges in triglycine sulphate. Phys. Rev. 117, 1235–1243 (1960).
Merz, W. J. The electric and optical behavior of BaTiO3 single-domain crystals. Phys. Rev. 76, 1221–1225 (1949).
Kimura, T., Lawes, G., Goto, G., Tokura, Y. & Ramirez, A. P. Magnetoelectric phase diagrams of orthorhombic RMnO3 (R=Gd, Tb, and Dy). Phys.Rev. B 71, 224425 (2005).
Aliouane, N. et al. Magnetic order and ferroelectricity in RMnO3 multiferroic manganites: coupling between R- and Mn-spins. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 434215 (2008).
Prokhnenko, O. et al. Coupling of frustrated Ising spins to the magnetic cycloid in multiferroic TbMnO3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 177206 (2007).
Aoyama, T., Miyake, A., Shimizu, K. & Kimura, T. Dielectric and AC-calorimetry measurements of SmMnO3 under high pressure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, SB036 (2012).
Aoyama, T., Miyake, A., Kagayama, T., Shimizu, K. & Kimura, T. Pressure effects on the magnetoelectric properties of a multiferroic triangular-lattice antiferromagnet CuCrO2 . Phys. Rev. B 87, 094401 (2013).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3869 (1996).
Wollan, E. O. & Koehler, W. C. Neutron diffraction study of the magnetic properties of the series of perovskite-type compounds [(1−x)La, xCa]MnO3 . Phys. Rev. 100, 545 (1955).
Mochizuki, M., Furukawa, N. & Nagaosa, N. Theory of spin-phonon coupling in multiferroic manganese perovskites RMnO3 . Phys. Rev. B 84, 144409 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Miyake for his help in high-pressure experiments, and M. Misek and J.P. Attfield for their enlightening discussions. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for the JSPS Fellows (13J01596) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 24244058 and 24740235, and the Italian Ministry of Research through the project MIUR-PRIN ‘Interfacce di ossidi: nuove proprietà emergenti, multifunzionalità e dispositivi per l'elettronica e l'energia (OXIDE)’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.A. and T.K. initiated this work. A.I. prepared a single crystal of TbMnO3. T.A. carried out all the experiments under high pressure by using the DAC with assistance from K.S. K.Y. and S.P. performed density functional simulations. T.A., K.Y. and T.K. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Notes 1-2 and Supplementary References (PDF 220 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aoyama, T., Yamauchi, K., Iyama, A. et al. Giant spin-driven ferroelectric polarization in TbMnO3 under high pressure. Nat Commun 5, 4927 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5927
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5927
This article is cited by
-
Anomalous polarization enhancement in a van der Waals ferroelectric material under pressure
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Ferroelectric domain walls for nanotechnology
Nature Reviews Materials (2021)
-
Local electric-field control of multiferroic spin-spiral domains in TbMnO3
npj Quantum Materials (2020)
-
Nanoengineering room temperature ferroelectricity into orthorhombic SmMnO3 films
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Dielectric, optical, and multiferroic properties of Co-doped SrBi2Nb1.8Fe0.2O9 ceramics
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.