The historical context in which a scientific paper is published is an important factor that should not be overlooked, suggest Qian Wang and Chris Toumey.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Dinsmore, A. et al. Science 298, 1006–1009 (2002).
Lin, Y., Skaff, H., Emrick, T., Dinsmore, A. D. & Russell, T. P. Science 299, 226–229 (2003).
Pickering, S. J. Chem. Soc. 91, 2001–2021 (1907).
Pieranski, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 569–572 (1980).
Binks, B. & Clint, J. H. Langmuir 18, 1270–1273 (2002).
Stent, G. Sci. Am. 84–93 (December 1972).
Nature Chem. 3, 649 (2011).
Traweek, S. Beamtimes and Lifetimes 77 (Harvard Univ. Press, 1988).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Toumey, C. Lost history versus good science. Nature Chem 3, 832–833 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1179
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1179