Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field

Nature volume 486, pages 233–236 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The Hubble Deep Field provides one of the deepest multiwavelength views of the distant Universe and has led to the detection of thousands of galaxies seen throughout cosmic time1. An early map of the Hubble Deep Field at a wavelength of 850 micrometres, which is sensitive to dust emission powered by star formation, revealed the brightest source in the field, dubbed HDF 850.1 (ref. 2). For more than a decade, and despite significant efforts, no counterpart was found at shorter wavelengths, and it was not possible to determine its redshift, size or mass3,4,5,6,7. Here we report a redshift of z = 5.183 for HDF 850.1, from a millimetre-wave molecular line scan. This places HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2, corresponding to a cosmic age of only 1.1 billion years after the Big Bang. This redshift is significantly higher than earlier estimates3,4,6,8 and higher than those of most of the hundreds of submillimetre-bright galaxies identified so far. The source has a star-formation rate of 850 solar masses per year and is spatially resolved on scales of 5 kiloparsecs, with an implied dynamical mass of about 1.3 × 1011 solar masses, a significant fraction of which is present in the form of molecular gas. Despite our accurate determination of redshift and position, a counterpart emitting starlight remains elusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Detection of four lines tracing the star-forming interstellar medium in HDF 850.1.
Figure 2: [C  ii ] line emission towards HDF 850.1.
Figure 3: Distribution of galaxies near HDF 850.1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, R. E. et al. The Hubble Deep Field: observations, data reduction, and galaxy photometry. Astron. J. 112, 1335–1389 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hughes, D. H. et al. A submillimetre survey of the Hubble Deep Field: unveiling dust-enshrouded star formation in the Early Universe. Nature 394, 241–247 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Downes, D. et al. Proposed identification of Hubble Deep Field submillimeter source HDF 850.1. Astron. Astrophys. 347, 809–820 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlop, J. S. et al. Discovery of the galaxy counterpart of HDF 850.1, the brightest submillimetre source in the Hubble Deep Field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 350, 769–784 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagg, J. et al. A broad-band spectroscopic search for CO line emission in HDF850.1: the brightest submillimetre object in the Hubble Deep Field-north. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 375, 745–752 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., Wang, W.-H. & Williams, J. P. An accurate position for HDF 850.1: the brightest submillimeter source in the Hubble Deep Field-north. Astrophys. J. 697, L122–L126 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carilli, C. L. & Yun, M. S. The radio-to-submillimeter spectral index as a redshift indicator. Astrophys. J. 513, L13–L16 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richards, E. A. Radio Identification of Submillimeter Sources in the Hubble Deep Field. Astrophys. J. 513, L9–L12 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Solomon, P. M. & Vanden Bout, P. A. Molecular Gas at High Redshift. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 43, 677–725 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Walter, F. et al. A kiloparsec-scale hyper-starburst in a quasar host less than 1 gigayear after the Big Bang. Nature 457, 699–701 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander, D. et al. The Chandra Deep Field North survey. XIII. 2 ms point-source catalogs. Astron. J. 126, 539–574 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Loenen, A. F. et al. Excitation of the molecular gas in the nuclear region of M 82. Astron. Astrophys. 521, L2 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Downes, D. & Solomon, P. M. Rotating nuclear rings and extreme starbursts in ultraluminous galaxies. Astrophys. J. 507, 615–654 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tacconi, L. et al. Submillimeter galaxies at z ∼ 2: evidence for major mergers and constraints on lifetimes, IMF, and CO-H2 conversion factor. Astrophys. J. 680, 246–262 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ivison, R. et al. Tracing the molecular gas in distant submillimetre galaxies via CO(1–0) imaging with the Expanded Very Large Array. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 1913–1925 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krumholz, M. R., Dekel, A. & McKee, C. F. A universal, local star formation law in galactic clouds, nearby galaxies, high-redshift disks, and starbursts. Astrophys. J. 745, 69 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stacey, G. J. et al. A 158 μm [C II] line survey of galaxies at z ∼ 1–2: an indicator of star formation in the early Universe. Astrophys. J. 724, 957–974 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barger, A. J. et al. X-ray, optical, and infrared imaging and spectral properties of the 1Ms Chandra Deep Field North sources. Astron. J. 124, 1839–1885 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Capak, P. et al. A massive protocluster of galaxies at a redshift of z ≈ 5.3. Nature 470, 233–235 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barger, A. J., Cowie, L. L. & Wang, W.-H. A highly complete spectroscopic survey of the GOODS-N field. Astrophys. J. 689, 687–708 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hogg, D. W., Blandford, R., Kundic, T., Fassnacht, C. D. & Malhotra, S. A candidate gravitational lens in the Hubble Deep Field. Astrophys. J. 467, L73–L75 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Riechers, D. A. et al. A massive molecular gas reservoir in the z = 5.3 submillimeter galaxy AzTEC-3. Astrophys. J. 720, L131–L136 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Daddi, E. et al. Two bright submillimeter galaxies in a z = 4.05 protocluster in Goods-North, and accurate radio-infrared photometric redshifts. Astrophys. J. 694, 1517–1538 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schinnerer, E. et al. Molecular gas in a submillimeter galaxy at z = 4.5: evidence for a major merger at 1 billion years after the Big Bang. Astrophys. J. 689, L5–L8 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Combes, F. et al. A bright z = 5.2 lensed submillimeter galaxy in the field of Abell 773. HLSJ091828.6+514223. Astron. Astrophys. 538, L4 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cox, P. et al. Gas and dust in a submillimeter galaxy at z = 4.24 from the Herschel atlas. Astrophys. J. 740, 63 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivison, R. et al. A robust sample of submillimetre galaxies: constraints on the prevalence of dusty, high-redshift starbursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 364, 1025–1040 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiklind, T. et al. A population of massive and evolved galaxies at z>∼5. Astrophys. J. 676, 781–806 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dickinson, M. et al. The unusual infrared object HDF-N J123656.3+621322. Astrophys. J. 531, 624–634 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Daddi, E. et al. Very high gas fractions and extended gas reservoirs in z = 1.5 disk galaxies. Astrophys. J. 713, 686–707 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is based on observations carried out with the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer. IRAM is supported by MPG (Germany), INSU/CNRS (France) and IGN (Spain). The Jansky Very Large Array of NRAO is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. D.A.R. acknowledges support from NASA through a Spitzer Space Telescope grant. R.D. acknowledges funding through DLR project FKZ 50OR1004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany,

    Fabian Walter, Roberto Decarli, Elisabete Da Cunha, Jacqueline Hodge & Hans-Walter Rix

  2. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Pete V. Domenici Array Science Center, PO Box O, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA,

    Fabian Walter & Chris Carilli

  3. Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, 19 J J Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK,

    Chris Carilli, Lindley Lentati & Roberto Maiolino

  4. Argelander Institute for Astronomy, University of Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany,

    Frank Bertoldi

  5. IRAM, 300 rue de la Piscine, F-38406 Saint-Martin d'Hères, France,

    Pierre Cox, Dennis Downes, Roberto Neri & Melanie Krips

  6. Laboratoire AIM, CEA/DSM-CNRS-Université Paris Diderot, Irfu/Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France,

    Emanuele Daddi & David Elbaz

  7. National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, 85719, Arizona, USA

    Mark Dickinson

  8. Astronomy Department, California Institute of Technology, MC105-24, Pasadena, California 91125, USA,

    Richard Ellis & Dominik A. Riechers

  9. Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany,

    Axel Weiss & Karl Menten

  10. Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA,

    Eric Bell

  11. Universität Wien, Institut für Astronomie, Türkenschanzstraße 17, 1080 Wien, Austria,

    Helmut Dannerbauer

  12. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 95064, California, USA

    Mark Krumholz

  13. INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via di Frascati 33, 00040 Monte Porzio Catone, Italy,

    Roberto Maiolino

  14. Department of Astronomy, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA,

    Brant Robertson & Dan P. Stark

  15. Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA

    Hyron Spinrad

  16. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, USA,

    Daniel Stern

Authors
  1. Fabian Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roberto Decarli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chris Carilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frank Bertoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pierre Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elisabete Da Cunha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Emanuele Daddi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mark Dickinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dennis Downes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. David Elbaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Richard Ellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jacqueline Hodge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Roberto Neri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Dominik A. Riechers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Axel Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Eric Bell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Helmut Dannerbauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Melanie Krips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Mark Krumholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Lindley Lentati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Roberto Maiolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Karl Menten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Hans-Walter Rix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Brant Robertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Hyron Spinrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Dan P. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Daniel Stern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.W. had the overall lead of the project. The Plateau de Bure Interferometer data were analysed by R.D., F.W., P.C., R.N., M.K. and D.D. The Jansky Very Large Array data reduction was performed by C.C., J.H. and L.L. The molecular gas excitation was led by A.W. Spectroscopic redshift information was provided by M.D., R.E., H.S., D.S. and D.P.S. The spectral energy distribution analysis, including new Herschel data, was led by E.D.C, D.E. and E.D. An updated lensing model was provided by D.D. All authors helped with the proposal, data analysis and interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Walter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-3, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figures 1-2 and additional references. (PDF 170 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walter, F., Decarli, R., Carilli, C. et al. The intense starburst HDF 850.1 in a galaxy overdensity at z ≈ 5.2 in the Hubble Deep Field. Nature 486, 233–236 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11073

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing