The image of the lacewing in 'Leaf-like history of lacewings' (Nature 467, 134; 10.1038/467134a2010) was incorrectly described. The inset was not a similar-looking leaf, as stated, but a duplicate of one of the wings the authors had isolated for comparison.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/467134a
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correction. Nature 467, 255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/467255e
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/467255e
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
