Nature reserves and protected areas enjoy sacred status in conservation — which translates into a 'do not touch' attitude. But selling off some of the less worthy of them would pay conservation dividends.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
R. SMITH/PHOTOLIBRARY.COM
References
Fuller, R. A. et al. Nature 466, 365–367 (2010).
Fairfax, S. K., Gwin, L., King, M. A., Raymond, L. & Watt, L. A. Buying Nature: The Limits of Land Acquisition as a Conservation Strategy, 1780–2004 (MIT Press, 2005).
Murdoch, W. et al. Biol. Conserv. 139, 375–388 (2007).
Bode, M. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6498–6501 (2008).
Naidoo, R. et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 681–687 (2006).
McCauley, D. J. Nature 443, 27–28 (2006).
Kareiva, P. & Marvier, M. Conservation Science: Balancing the Needs of People and Nature (Roberts, Greenwood Village, Colorado, in the press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kareiva, P. Trade-in to trade-up. Nature 466, 322–323 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/466322a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466322a
