As calls for reform intensify following recent furores about e-mails, conflicts of interest, glaciers and extreme weather, five climatologists propose ways forward for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Their suggestions range from reaffirming the panel' governing principles to increasing the number and speed of its publications to replacing the volunteer organization with a permanently staffed structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation Open Access 30 June 2016
-
A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations
Climatic Change Open Access 05 March 2011
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
SOURCE: IPCC
Additional information
See also Perspectives, page 747 . Have your say on the future of the IPCC at http://go.nature.com/orzWau .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
IPCC: cherish it, tweak it or scrap it?. Nature 463, 730–732 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/463730a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/463730a
This article is cited by
-
Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC
Nature Climate Change (2023)
-
Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation (2018)
-
1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement
Nature Climate Change (2016)
-
Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports
Nature Climate Change (2016)
-
New leadership for a user-friendly IPCC
Nature Climate Change (2015)
