Abstract
Active surveillance of prostate cancer patients involves subjecting them to multiple prostate biopsies, and we sought to investigate the effects of this on functional outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between May 2009 and December 2009, 367 patients who consecutively underwent RARP by a single surgeon were divided into two groups, one that had single prostate biopsy and another multiple biopsies before RARP. The groups were matched for significant clinicopathologic preoperative variables, and only premorbidly potent low-risk cases that underwent nerve sparing were included. This left 50 and 23 patients for analysis in the single and multiple biopsy groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was potency and continence at 3 and 6 months after surgery. We found continence rates of 84% (83%) and 94% (96%) for single (multiple) biopsy groups at 3 and 6 months, respectively (P=0.88, P=0.77). Multiple biopsy patients had worse postoperative erectile function at 6 months (57% versus 80%, P=0.03). Men subject to multiple preoperative biopsies are more likely to become impotent postoperatively than those who undergo surgery after a single biopsy. This should be borne in mind when counseling men regarding repeat biopsy as part of an active surveillance strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E . Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277–300.
Fujita K, Landis P, McNeil BK, Pavlovich CP . Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 2009; 182: 2664–2669.
Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A . The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2001; 165: 445–454.
Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schrder FH . Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002; 60: 826–830.
Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Cooper A, Siegel Y, Lindner A . The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of voiding impairment. J Urol 2001; 166: 2242–2246.
Ochiai A, Babaian RJ . Update on prostate biopsy technique. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 157–162.
Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J . Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006; 175: 1605–1612.
Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, Salo JO, Taari K, Vehmas T et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: comparison between fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin echo and three-dimensional dual-echo, steady-state sequences. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 236–241.
Lavery HJ, Levinson AW, Brajtbord JS, Samadi DB . Candidacy for active surveillance may be associated with improved functional outcomes after prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2011, e-pub ahead of print.
Tuncel A, Kirilmaz U, Nalcacioglu V, Aslan Y, Polat F, Atan A . The impact of transrectal prostate needle biopsy on sexuality in men and their female partners. Urology 2008; 71: 1128–1131.
Akbal C, Turker P, Tavukcu HH, Simsek F, Turkeri L . Erectile function in prostate cancer-free patients who underwent prostate saturation biopsy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 540–544.
Acknowledgements
Dr Prasanna Sooriakumaran is an Intuitive Surgical Clinical Fellow; Dr Ashutosh Tewari is the endowed Ronald P Lynch Professor of Urologic Oncology, the Director of the Prostate Cancer Institute, and Director of the Lefrak Center for Robotic Surgery, and has received grants in the past from Intuitive Surgical Inc. and the National Institute of Health. However, this work was not supported by such grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sooriakumaran, P., Calaway, A., Sagalovich, D. et al. The impact of multiple biopsies on outcomes of nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res 24, 161–164 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.9
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Does experience change the role of systematic biopsy during MRI-fusion biopsy of the prostate?
World Journal of Urology (2023)
-
The role of mpMRI in qualification of patients with ISUP 1 prostate cancer on biopsy to radical prostatectomy
BMC Urology (2021)
-
Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Are We Moving Towards More or Less Radical Surgical Intervention?
Current Urology Reports (2015)