Abstract
The objective of this study was to explore the roles and perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED). This qualitative study used focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. This study was conducted based on 28 GPs from an urban area in Malaysia who had managed patients with ED and prescribed anti-ED drugs. Main outcome measures included the roles of GPs in managing patients with ED (active or passive), perceptions regarding ED and the treatment, and factors influencing their decision to prescribe. Majority of the GPs assumed a passive role when managing patients with ED. This was partly due to their perception of the disease being nonserious. Some also perceived ED as mainly psychological in nature. The anti-ED drugs were often viewed as a lifestyle drug with potentially serious side effects. The fear of being perceived by patients as ‘pushing’ for the drug and being blamed if the patients were to develop serious side effects also hampered the management of this disease. GPs who participated in this study remained passive in identifying and treating patients with ED and this was attributed to their perception of the disease, drug treatment and patient's background.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feldman HA et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61.
Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.
Levine LA, Kloner RA . Importance of asking questions about erectile dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1210–1213.
Marwick C . Survey says patients expect little physician help on sex. JAMA 1999; 281: 2173–2174.
Bradley CP . Factors which influence the decision whether or not to prescribe: the dilemma facing general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract 1992; 42: 454–458.
The Process of Care Consensus Model. The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 59–70.
Rutchik SD et al. Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of erectile dysfunction among family practice physicians. Urology 2001; 57: 146–150.
Metz ME, Seibert MH . Men's expectations of physicians in sexual health concerns. J Sex Marital Ther 1990; 16: 79–88.
Pontin D, Porter T, McDonagh R . Investigating the effect of erectile dysfunction on the lives of men: a qualitative research study. J Clin Nurs 2002; 11: 264–272.
Fink HA et al. Sildenafil for male erectile dysfunction—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1349–1360.
Conti CR, Pepine CJ, Sweeney M . Efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in patients with ischemic heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 29C–34C.
Perttula E . Physician attitudes and behaviour regarding erectile dysfunction in at-risk patients from a rural community. Postgrad Med J 1999; 75: 83–85.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by educational grants from the Asia Pacific Society for Impotence Research (APSIR), and by GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceutical and Bayer Healthcare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, C., Low, W., Tan, N. et al. The role of general practitioners in the management of erectile dysfunction—a qualitative study. Int J Impot Res 16, 60–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901141
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901141